Submission 405, Text Formatting

[mtwente]

Pull request

Proposed changes

• add line breaks in between paragraphs for improved legibility

Types of changes

• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
• Enhancement (non-breaking change which enhances functionality)
• Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change).

Checklist

• I have read the README document.
• My change requires a change to the documentation.
• I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• I have mentioned all co-authors in the PR description as Co-authored-by: Name <[email protected]>.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Enhanced clarity and structure in the document’s introduction and conclusion.
  • Expanded section on methodologies for data acquisition from web archives.
  • Improved presentation of data statistics from the Internet Archive for museums.

• Bug Fixes

  • Reorganized text for better flow and readability.

• Documentation

  • Updated content to reflect challenges and opportunities in data-driven research.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request primarily involve modifications to the document submissions/405/index.qmd, aimed at enhancing clarity and structure. Key sections, including the introduction and conclusion, have been refined to improve the flow of ideas and summarize the significance of data-driven approaches in humanities research. The content has been reorganized to better address web archives, data acquisition challenges, and the importance of digital research infrastructures, with specific examples retained but presented more clearly.

Changes

File	Change Summary
submissions/405/index.qmd	Enhanced clarity and structure; refined introduction and conclusion; expanded section on methodologies for data acquisition; reorganized content for better flow; adjusted presentation of examples from the Internet Archive.

Possibly related PRs

• Submission 405, Nadezhda Povroznik  #14: This PR includes changes to submissions/405/index.qmd, which is the same file as the main PR. It discusses the significance of data-driven approaches in humanities research and the role of web archives, aligning closely with the main PR's focus on enhancing clarity and structure regarding these topics.

Suggested labels

submission

🐰 "In the archives where data gleams,
We hop through history's vibrant dreams.
With clarity and structure, we refine,
The tales of museums, now brightly shine.
A journey through web's vast embrace,
Data-driven wonders, we joyfully chase!" 🐇

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 17cfa9a and 30774d3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• submissions/405/index.qmd (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (9)

submissions/405/index.qmd (9)

28-29: Improved paragraph structure.

The addition of a line break after the paragraph enhances readability, aligning with the PR objectives. The content effectively introduces the concept of data-driven approaches in humanities research.

---

30-31: Enhanced paragraph separation.

The addition of a line break after this paragraph improves the document's structure and readability. The content effectively introduces web archives and their potential for big data research, providing valuable context for the study.

---

36-37: Improved readability with clear research focus.

The addition of a line break after this paragraph enhances the document's structure. The content effectively introduces the specific focus of the research on the MET and NMA, clearly stating the data sources used.

---

38-39: Enhanced structure with informative content.

The addition of a line break after this paragraph improves the document's readability. The content effectively discusses strategies for obtaining data from web archives, providing valuable information on data collection methods for the study.

---

40-41: Improved structure with supporting statistics.

The addition of a line break after this paragraph enhances the document's readability. The content effectively presents specific statistics on web archive data for the MET and NMA websites, providing concrete support for the research.

---

42-43: Enhanced readability with informative content on research infrastructures.

The addition of a line break after this paragraph improves the document's structure. The content effectively discusses research infrastructures for working with web archived materials, providing valuable information on tools and platforms relevant to the study.

---

44-45: Improved structure with key information on URL analysis.

The addition of a line break after this paragraph enhances the document's readability. The content effectively discusses the importance of URL analysis in assessing web archive data, providing valuable insights into a crucial aspect of the research methodology.

---

46-55: Significantly improved readability in longer section.

The addition of line breaks after each paragraph in this longer section greatly enhances the document's structure and readability. The content effectively covers various important aspects of web archive research, including subdomains, data formats, and analytical challenges. This improved structure makes it easier for readers to digest the complex information presented.

---

Line range hint 1-55: Overall improvement in document structure and readability.

The changes made in this pull request consistently enhance the document's readability by adding line breaks between paragraphs throughout the paper. This aligns perfectly with the stated PR objectives of improving legibility. The content remains unchanged and of high quality, covering various aspects of data-driven approaches to studying the history of museums on the web. These structural improvements will significantly aid readers in navigating and comprehending this complex academic paper.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.