[#392] noisy logger

[elfenpiff]

Notes for Reviewer

Sets default log level to LogLevel:Warn.

Pre-Review Checklist for the PR Author

1. Add sensible notes for the reviewer
2. PR title is short, expressive and meaningful
3. Relevant issues are linked in the References section
4. Every source code file has a copyright header with SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 OR MIT
5. Branch follows the naming format (iox2-123-introduce-posix-ipc-example)
6. Commits messages are according to this guideline
   • Commit messages have the issue ID ([#123] Add posix ipc example)
   • Commit author matches Eclipse Contributor Agreement (and ECA is signed)
7. Tests follow the best practice for testing
8. Changelog updated in the unreleased section including API breaking changes
9. Assign PR to reviewer
10. All checks have passed (except task-list-completed)

Checklist for the PR Reviewer

• Commits are properly organized and messages are according to the guideline
• Unit tests have been written for new behavior
• Public API is documented
• PR title describes the changes

Post-review Checklist for the PR Author

1. All open points are addressed and tracked via issues

References

Closes #392

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.00%. Comparing base (25dd2a6) to head (5070b05).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #393      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   79.44%   79.00%   -0.44%     
==========================================
  Files         193      193              
  Lines       22702    22702              
==========================================
- Hits        18035    17936      -99     
- Misses       4667     4766      +99     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
iceoryx2-bb/log/src/lib.rs	64.00% <ø> (ø)

... and 19 files with indirect coverage changes

[elBoberido]

@elfenpiff do you think you could sneak in the new benchmark images for the main README in this PR?

[elfenpiff]

@elBoberido the benchmark images are already the newest ones. Take a look at the first image where iceoryx2 is close to zero and 10 times faster than iceoryx

[elBoberido]

Oh, I thought the one which compares the latency to the last release would be the default 😅