-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[MODDATAIMP-931] DITF forward merge #298
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Co-authored-by: Eric Valuk <[email protected]>
ncovercash
changed the title
[DO NOT MERGE] DITF work
[MODDATAIMP-931] [DO NOT MERGE] DITF forward merge
Sep 28, 2023
Co-authored-by: Carole Godfrey <[email protected]>
ncovercash
force-pushed
the
ditf-poppy
branch
from
September 28, 2023 19:52
eae2c8f
to
75c82be
Compare
ncovercash
force-pushed
the
ditf-poppy
branch
from
September 28, 2023 19:54
75c82be
to
2db23fe
Compare
9 tasks
ncovercash
changed the title
[MODDATAIMP-931] [DO NOT MERGE] DITF forward merge
[MODDATAIMP-931] DITF forward merge
Oct 9, 2023
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! |
TarasSpashchenko
approved these changes
Oct 10, 2023
KaterynaSenchenko
approved these changes
Oct 10, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Jira MODDATAIMP-931
To be merged with folio-org/mod-source-record-manager#809
TODOS and Open Questions
language
trait in v33.2 back in 2021 (via FOLIO-3351: Remove lang query parameter and language.raml trait raml#141). My working suspicion as to why this had not affected mod-DI yet is thatdata-import-raml-storage
's version oframl-util
was behind, and that mod-DI's version ofdata-import-raml-storage
was even further behind than that, causing significant lag.data-import-raml-storage
, which includes our added schemas, we must update our version.lang
param (never used) and add the newtotalRecords
field which, per the docs, should be sufficient.totalRecords
eventually gets implemented as expectedDataImportQueueItemDaoImpl
to use a real DB instead of extensive mocking. This would help catch errors in schemas, get a bit more coverage, and be easier to maintain.ModTenantApiTest
— it's queries to/_/tenant
and responses are tested as part of all other integration tests inAbstractRestTest
Bump other Maven dependencies?.map(v -> someConcreteValue)
calls to eliminate extra invocation overheadNotes
I do not believe the code smell
Replace this "switch" statement by "if" statements to increase readability
needs to be addressed:The
switch
statement here provides an easily readable and testable method to only cancel jobs which do not match those four statuses. An equivalentif
would require a long and redundant boolean expression.