Add Geolocation tests #2445
Add Geolocation tests #2445
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to feature permissions for admin and vendor roles within a YAML configuration file, alongside updates to related test classes and methods. Notable adjustments include enabling new capabilities for admins regarding geolocation settings and map radius configurations, while restricting certain vendor actions related to ShipStation credentials. Additionally, new methods for handling map radius functionality were introduced, and existing methods underwent renaming to reflect changes in functionality. The overall focus is on restructuring permissions and enhancing testing coverage for geolocation features. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (5)tests/pw/feature-map/feature-map.yml (5)Line range hint The configuration properly defines granular controls for map positioning and display settings.
The configuration properly supports both kilometers and miles for radius search, ensuring compatibility across different regions.
The configuration properly enables the map radius bar feature while correctly commenting out duplicate entries.
Several map-related features are commented out. Please clarify if these features are:
The configuration explicitly prevents vendors from managing their ShipStation credentials. This could impact vendor operations. ✅ Verification successfulLet me gather more information about the ShipStation integration implementation to better understand these restrictions. Let me search for any ShipStation-related configuration and permission checks. Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response: ShipStation credential management restrictions are intentionally configured for security The feature map configuration explicitly disables vendor's ability to generate and revoke ShipStation credentials while still allowing them to view and use the ShipStation settings page. This appears to be an intentional security design where:
This is a common security pattern for third-party integrations where credential management is restricted to administrators while allowing vendors to use the integration. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Search for ShipStation credential management implementation
echo "Searching for ShipStation credential management..."
rg -i "shipstation.*credentials"
# Search for any documentation about ShipStation restrictions
echo "Searching for ShipStation documentation..."
fd -g "README*" -X rg -i "shipstation"
Length of output: 683 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Search for ShipStation-related code and configurations
echo "Searching for ShipStation implementation..."
rg -i "shipstation" -A 3 -B 3
# Search for any permission checks related to ShipStation
echo "Searching for permission checks..."
ast-grep --pattern 'if ($$$shipstation$$$) { $$$ }'
Length of output: 139776 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Search for ShipStation permissions and configuration
echo "Searching for ShipStation permissions..."
rg -i "shipstation.*permission|can.*shipstation" -A 3 -B 3
# Search for any ShipStation settings/configuration files
echo "Searching for ShipStation configuration files..."
fd -g "*shipstation*.php" -g "*shipstation*.js" -g "*shipstation*.json"
Length of output: 116507 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
tests/pw/tests/e2e/geolocation.spec.ts (1)
54-59: Consider enhancing test coverage with edge cases.While the basic implementation is good, consider adding tests for:
- Edge cases (e.g., maximum allowed distance)
- Invalid inputs (e.g., negative distances)
- Different min-max combinations
Example enhancement:
[ { unit: 'km', min: '0', max: '10' }, { unit: 'km', min: '10', max: '100' }, { unit: 'miles', min: '0', max: '10' }, { unit: 'miles', min: '10', max: '100' } ].forEach(({ unit, min, max }) => { test(`admin can set map radius search unit ${unit} with range ${min}-${max}`, { tag: ['@pro', '@admin'] }, async () => { await dbUtils.updateOptionValue(dbData.dokan.optionName.geolocation, { distance_unit: unit, distance_min: min, distance_max: max }); await admin.viewMapRadiusSearchUnitAndDistance(unit as 'km' | 'miles', { min, max }); }); });tests/pw/pages/noticeAndPromotionPage.ts (1)
Line range hint
94-99: Align implementation withallowDiagnosticTrackingmethod.The implementation of
disallowDiagnosticTrackingdiffers from its counterpartallowDiagnosticTrackingin terms of wait strategy:
allowDiagnosticTrackingusesclickAndWaitForResponsewith a 302 status expectationdisallowDiagnosticTrackingusesclickAndWaitForLoadStatewithout status verificationThis inconsistency could lead to flaky tests. Consider aligning the implementation:
async disallowDiagnosticTracking() { await this.goIfNotThere(data.subUrls.backend.adminDashboard, 'networkidle'); - await this.clickAndWaitForLoadState(selector.admin.dokan.diagnostic.disallowCollectData); + await this.clickAndWaitForResponse(data.subUrls.backend.diagnosticNotice, selector.admin.dokan.diagnostic.disallowCollectData, 302); await this.notToBeVisible(selector.admin.dokan.diagnostic.noticeDiv); }tests/pw/pages/geolocationPage.ts (1)
100-127: Add documentation and consider maintainability improvementsThe new methods would benefit from:
- JSDoc documentation describing parameters, return values, and examples
- Constants for common values like initial slider value
- Integration test scenarios combining radius and unit changes
Add documentation and constants:
/** Default value for the radius slider */ private static readonly DEFAULT_SLIDER_VALUE = '0'; /** * Verifies the map radius search unit and distance display * @param unit - The unit of measurement ('km' or 'miles') * @param distance - Object containing min and max distance values * @example * await viewMapRadiusSearchUnitAndDistance('km', { min: '0', max: '10' }); */ async viewMapRadiusSearchUnitAndDistance(...) /** * Simulates sliding the map radius bar to a specific value * @param slideUnit - The target value for the radius slider * @throws {Error} If slideUnit is not a positive number * @example * await slideMapRadiusBar('10'); */ async slideMapRadiusBar(...)tests/pw/tests/e2e/commission.spec.ts (2)
105-106: Track TODO items in the issue tracker.The TODO comments indicate missing test coverage for commission visibility across different views. These should be tracked in the issue tracker for better visibility and follow-up.
Would you like me to create GitHub issues to track these test implementations? I can help structure the test cases for:
- Admin commission visibility tests for product list, order list, order details, and sub-order details
- Vendor earning visibility tests for product list, product details, order list, and order details
Line range hint
26-31: Clean up commented-out code.The commented-out code in the beforeAll/afterAll hooks related to subscription functionality should either be:
- Implemented if required for the test suite
- Removed if not needed
- Or if it's a work in progress, documented with a TODO comment explaining the plan
This will improve code maintainability and readability.
- // if (DOKAN_PRO) { - // enable dokan subscription - // await dbUtils.updateOptionValue(dbData.dokan.optionName.vendorSubscription, { ...dbData.dokan.vendorSubscriptionSettings, enable_pricing: 'on', enable_subscription_pack_in_reg: 'on' }); - // [subscriptionProductId] = await createDokanSubscriptionProduct(); - // } + // TODO: Implement subscription setup once createDokanSubscriptionProduct is available + if (DOKAN_PRO) { + // Subscription setup will be added here + }Also applies to: 37-41
tests/pw/feature-map/feature-map.yml (1)
Line range hint
817-835: Maintain consistent commenting pattern for duplicate and disabled features.The section uses different commenting styles:
- Some entries use
#prefix with[duplicate]suffix- Some entries use only
#prefixApply consistent commenting pattern:
-# admin can set Dokan geolocation settings [duplicate]: true +admin can set Dokan geolocation settings [duplicate]: true -# admin can set map zoom level: false +# admin can set map zoom level: false -# admin can set map default location: false +# admin can set map default location: false🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 839-839: syntax error: expected , but found ''
(syntax)
[warning] 840-840: wrong indentation: expected 12 but found 10
(indentation)
tests/pw/pages/selectors.ts (1)
7013-7017: LGTM! Consider adjusting indentation for consistency.The new radius search selectors are well-organized and semantically named. The indentation could be adjusted to match the surrounding code blocks for better readability.
- radiusSearch: { - radiusUnit: 'span.dokan-range-slider-value', - slider: 'input.dokan-range-slider', - }, + radiusSearch: { + radiusUnit: 'span.dokan-range-slider-value', + slider: 'input.dokan-range-slider', + },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
tests/pw/feature-map/feature-map.yml(3 hunks)tests/pw/pages/geolocationPage.ts(1 hunks)tests/pw/pages/noticeAndPromotionPage.ts(1 hunks)tests/pw/pages/selectors.ts(1 hunks)tests/pw/tests/e2e/commission.spec.ts(1 hunks)tests/pw/tests/e2e/geolocation.spec.ts(2 hunks)tests/pw/tests/e2e/plugin.spec.ts(1 hunks)tests/pw/utils/dbData.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- tests/pw/tests/e2e/plugin.spec.ts
- tests/pw/utils/dbData.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
tests/pw/feature-map/feature-map.yml
[error] 839-839: syntax error: expected , but found ''
(syntax)
[warning] 840-840: wrong indentation: expected 12 but found 10
(indentation)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
tests/pw/tests/e2e/geolocation.spec.ts (2)
17-19: LGTM! Good practice adding test state setup.
The beforeEach hook ensures consistent test state by resetting geolocation settings before each test run.
61-63: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Verify the map radius bar test implementation.
The current test implementation appears incomplete:
- No visible assertions to verify the outcome
- Hardcoded value '5' lacks context (is it kilometers or miles?)
- Single test case might not be sufficient for this interactive feature
Let's verify the implementation of the slideMapRadiusBar method:
Consider enhancing the test:
test.describe('map radius bar interactions', () => {
test('customer can slide map radius bar to minimum value', async () => {
await admin.slideMapRadiusBar('0');
// Add assertions to verify the change
});
test('customer can slide map radius bar to maximum value', async () => {
await admin.slideMapRadiusBar('10');
// Add assertions to verify the change
});
test('customer can slide map radius bar to middle value', async () => {
await admin.slideMapRadiusBar('5');
// Add assertions to verify the change
});
});✅ Verification successful
Test implementation is incomplete but slideMapRadiusBar has proper validation
The slideMapRadiusBar implementation in geolocationPage.ts actually includes proper validation through toHaveValue assertion, but the test case can be improved:
- The method already validates the final slider value matches the input
- The implementation shows it's using a slider component with keyboard navigation
- The value represents slider units (0-based increments)
Consider enhancing the test coverage:
test.describe('map radius bar interactions', () => {
test('customer can slide map radius bar', { tag: ['@pro', '@customer'] }, async () => {
await admin.slideMapRadiusBar('5');
// Implementation already includes value assertion
// Consider additional assertions:
// - Verify radius filter is applied to shop results
// - Check URL parameters reflect the radius change
});
});🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the slideMapRadiusBar implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'slideMapRadiusBar($_) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 54
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for slideMapRadiusBar using ripgrep
rg -l "slideMapRadiusBar" -t ts
# Then search for its implementation with context
rg "slideMapRadiusBar" -t ts -A 10
Length of output: 1160
tests/pw/tests/e2e/commission.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint 82-94: Consider implementing skipped tests.
Three subscription-related tests are currently skipped due to the missing createDokanSubscriptionProduct function. Consider implementing this function to enable these tests.
Let's check if this function exists elsewhere in the codebase:
Would you like assistance in implementing the createDokanSubscriptionProduct function to enable these tests?
tests/pw/feature-map/feature-map.yml (1)
1110-1112: Verify ShipStation integration workflow with disabled permissions.
The changes restrict vendors from generating and revoking ShipStation credentials while allowing them to view settings. This might impact the vendor's ability to integrate with ShipStation.
Run the following script to verify the ShipStation integration workflow:
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate another script to search for more specific ShipStation integration code:
The previous search showed mostly UI/test files but we need to find the actual credential management code to verify the impact of disabling these permissions. Let's check for more specific credential-related patterns.
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response:
ShipStation credential restrictions align with intended functionality
The disabled permissions for generating and revoking ShipStation credentials are intentional and do not negatively impact the integration workflow. The code shows that vendors can still:
- View the ShipStation settings page
- Configure existing ShipStation settings like order statuses and shipping preferences
- Use the integration once credentials are set up by admin
The credential management restrictions are a security measure to ensure only admins can control API access, while vendors maintain ability to use the integration's core features.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for ShipStation integration dependencies and related code.
# Check for ShipStation related files and methods
rg -A 5 'shipStation|ShipStation'
# Check for credential generation/revocation methods
ast-grep --pattern 'function $_(generate|revoke).*[Ss]hip[Ss]tation.*\{'
Length of output: 127624
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for ShipStation credential generation/revocation related code
rg -A 5 -i "(generate|revoke|create|delete).*(shipstation|ship_station).*(credential|token|auth|key)"
# Search for ShipStation settings/configuration files
fd -i -g "*shipstation*.php" -g "*shipstation*.js" -g "*shipstation*.yml"
Length of output: 114300
All Submissions:
Changes proposed in this Pull Request:
Related Pull Request(s)
Closes
How to test the changes in this Pull Request:
Changelog entry
Title
Detailed Description of the pull request. What was previous behaviour
and what will be changed in this PR.
Before Changes
Describe the issue before changes with screenshots(s).
After Changes
Describe the issue after changes with screenshot(s).
Feature Video (optional)
Link of detailed video if this PR is for a feature.
PR Self Review Checklist:
FOR PR REVIEWER ONLY:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Tests