Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document where to find APIs #28

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 24, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Pi-Cla
Copy link

@Pi-Cla Pi-Cla commented May 22, 2024

There are some remaining TODOs which I could not figure out but it's something

Part of #27

@Pi-Cla Pi-Cla force-pushed the document_the_things branch from 883aaf6 to 26b8f42 Compare May 22, 2024 21:36
Pi-Cla pushed a commit to Pi-Cla/hexpm-rust that referenced this pull request May 22, 2024
…ove_owner

It turns out that revert_package_request was actually for removing owners.
I have tried to mitigate these mistakes in the future by making documentation over at gleam-lang#28 which has a somewhat reliable process for figuring out how the API works.

Part of gleam-lang/gleam#3155
Pi-Cla pushed a commit to Pi-Cla/hexpm-rust that referenced this pull request May 22, 2024
…ove_owner

It turns out that revert_package_request was actually for removing owners.
I have tried to mitigate these mistakes in the future by making documentation over at gleam-lang#28 which has a somewhat reliable process for figuring out how the API works.

Part of gleam-lang/gleam#3155
Copy link
Member

@lpil lpil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wonderful, thank you!

@lpil lpil merged commit 907f240 into gleam-lang:main May 24, 2024
4 checks passed
Pi-Cla pushed a commit to Pi-Cla/hexpm-rust that referenced this pull request May 29, 2024
…ove_owner

It turns out that revert_package_request was actually for removing owners.
I have tried to mitigate these mistakes in the future by making documentation over at gleam-lang#28 which has a somewhat reliable process for figuring out how the API works.

Part of gleam-lang/gleam#3155
lpil pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 30, 2024
…ove_owner

It turns out that revert_package_request was actually for removing owners.
I have tried to mitigate these mistakes in the future by making documentation over at #28 which has a somewhat reliable process for figuring out how the API works.

Part of gleam-lang/gleam#3155
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants