Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[tckrefactor] Jakarta Persistence 3.2 - JPQL new feature plus Persistence TCK runner and stored proc fixes #1247

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 11, 2024

Conversation

rfelcman
Copy link
Contributor

@rfelcman rfelcman commented Mar 7, 2024

Another set of tests for new Jakarta Persistence 3.2. In this case it's about JPQL new features:
https://jakartaee.github.io/persistence/latest-nightly/nightly.html#jakarta-persistence-3-2

There are two new improvements/fixes:

  • In *persistence.sprocs.sql Java package changes to CS_Procs class to catch up last refactoring in the project
  • In jpa/bin/pom.xml to make it runnable like add missing dependencies, path fix and some refactor like version properties and put eclipselink part into Maven profile

CC @lukasj @alwin-joseph @anajosep @arjantijms @cesarhernandezgt @dblevins @m0mus @edbratt @gurunrao @jansupol @jgallimore @kazumura @kwsutter @LanceAndersen @bhatpmk @RohitKumarJain @shighbar @gthoman @brideck @OndroMih @dmatej
@starksm64 @scottmarlow

…ence TCK runner and stored proc fixes

Signed-off-by: Radek Felcman <[email protected]>
jpa/bin/pom.xml Show resolved Hide resolved
jpa/bin/pom.xml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
jpa/bin/pom.xml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Radek Felcman <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@lukasj lukasj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM; note there might be some collisions with #1249

@gurunrao gurunrao merged commit 40d2ac2 into jakartaee:tckrefactor Mar 11, 2024
2 checks passed
@rfelcman rfelcman deleted the persistence32_jpql branch March 11, 2024 08:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants