Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix types action (test) #879

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Nov 27, 2024
Merged

fix types action (test) #879

merged 8 commits into from
Nov 27, 2024

Conversation

0xDEnYO
Copy link
Contributor

@0xDEnYO 0xDEnYO commented Nov 27, 2024

Which Jira task belongs to this PR?

Why did I implement it this way?

Checklist before requesting a review

  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • This pull request is as small as possible and only tackles one problem
  • I have added tests that cover the functionality / test the bug
  • I have updated any required documentation

Checklist for reviewer (DO NOT DEPLOY and contracts BEFORE CHECKING THIS!!!)

  • I have checked that any arbitrary calls to external contracts are validated and or restricted
  • I have checked that any privileged calls (i.e. storage modifications) are validated and or restricted
  • I have ensured that any new contracts have had AT A MINIMUM 1 preliminary audit conducted on by <company/auditor>

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 27, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces updates to a GitHub Actions workflow file to enhance the version tagging process. Key modifications include changing job permissions to allow writing tags, renaming steps for improved clarity, and adding steps for installing dependencies and generating bindings. The logic for retrieving the latest tag has been refined with better error handling, and the version update logic has been expanded to determine the type of version bump based on commit messages and branch names.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/types.yaml - Updated job permissions from read to write for contents.
- Renamed multiple steps for clarity (e.g., Install Solidity Libs to Install Solidity Libraries).
- Enhanced version update logic with detailed bump determination and error handling for tag retrieval.
.github/workflows_deactivated/types.oldVersion.yml - Introduced a new workflow for "Types Bindings" with steps for environment setup and version management based on branch and commit messages.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • ezynda3

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@0xDEnYO has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 10 minutes and 13 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 185d731 and 067252e.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@lifi-action-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test Coverage Report

Line Coverage: 76.10% (1675 / 2201 lines)
Function Coverage: 82.78% ( 351 / 424 functions)
Branch Coverage: 35.62% ( 192 / 539 branches)
Test coverage (76.10%) is above min threshold (76%). Check passed.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/types.yaml (1)

32-34: Consider using LTS version notation for Node.js.

While pinning to version 20 is good, consider using the more specific LTS version notation (e.g., '20.x') to ensure you're getting security updates while maintaining stability.

- node-version: 20
+ node-version: 20.x
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9dda461 and 3e989bc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/types.yaml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/types.yaml

71-71: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2162:info:10:11: read without -r will mangle backslashes

(shellcheck)


71-71: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2046:warning:16:13: Quote this to prevent word splitting

(shellcheck)


71-71: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:27:34: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


108-108: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:37:36: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


154-154: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:16:22: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/types.yaml (1)

13-13: LGTM: Explicit permission declaration with clear documentation.

The write permission for contents is correctly specified and well-documented with its purpose.

.github/workflows/types.yaml Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/types.yaml Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/types.yaml Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/types.yaml Show resolved Hide resolved
@0xDEnYO 0xDEnYO marked this pull request as ready for review November 27, 2024 04:29
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows_deactivated/types.oldVersion.yml (1)

1-1: Consider removing or documenting deprecated workflow

This workflow file is in a workflows_deactivated directory and marked as oldVersion, suggesting it's deprecated. To prevent confusion:

  1. If it's truly deprecated, consider removing it
  2. If it's kept for reference, add documentation explaining why it's kept and how it differs from the current version
.github/workflows/types.yaml (1)

130-131: Add version validation before parsing

The version parsing happens before validating the version format. Consider moving the validation before parsing to prevent potential errors.

+ # Validate current version format
+ if [[ ! "$CURRENT_VERSION" =~ ^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+(-beta)?$ ]]; then
+   echo "ERROR: Invalid version format: $CURRENT_VERSION"
+   exit 1
+ fi

IFS='.' read -r MAJOR MINOR PATCH <<< "${CURRENT_VERSION//[^0-9.]/}"
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3e989bc and 70630ac.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/types.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows_deactivated/types.oldVersion.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
.github/workflows/types.yaml (1)
Learnt from: 0xDEnYO
PR: lifinance/contracts#879
File: .github/workflows/types.yaml:58-62
Timestamp: 2024-11-27T04:28:26.318Z
Learning: In the file `.github/workflows/types.yaml`, additional error handling for file operations is not required in the 'Copy Type Bindings and ABI' step.
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/types.yaml

71-71: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2162:info:10:11: read without -r will mangle backslashes

(shellcheck)


71-71: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2046:warning:16:13: Quote this to prevent word splitting

(shellcheck)


71-71: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:33:34: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


114-114: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:35:36: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


158-158: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:16:22: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

🔇 Additional comments (5)
.github/workflows/types.yaml (5)

13-13: LGTM: Permission change is appropriate

The write permission for contents is correctly set and necessary for pushing new tags to the repository.


16-45: LGTM: Well-structured setup sequence

The setup steps are logically ordered, use pinned action versions, and have clear descriptive names. The sequence properly handles all dependencies from Foundry setup through TypeScript binding generation.


48-62: LGTM: Repository operations are appropriate

The repository checkout and file operations are correctly implemented. As per previous discussion, the current implementation of file operations works as intended.


64-65: LGTM: Build step is straightforward

The build step correctly handles the dependency installation and build process for the contract types.


81-81: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix shell script read command

The read command should use the -r flag to prevent backslash mangling.

- while read ITEM; do
+ while read -r ITEM; do

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/types.yaml (1)

Line range hint 1-172: Consider adding workflow robustness improvements.

While the workflow is well-structured, consider these improvements for better operational reliability:

  1. Add timeout-minutes to the job to prevent hanging
  2. Consider adding retry logic for network-dependent steps (e.g., curl, git push)
  3. Add status checks before critical operations to ensure repository state is as expected

Example addition for the job:

generate-tag:
  runs-on: ubuntu-latest
  timeout-minutes: 10  # Prevent hanging jobs
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

71-71: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2162:info:10:11: read without -r will mangle backslashes

(shellcheck)


71-71: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2046:warning:16:13: Quote this to prevent word splitting

(shellcheck)


71-71: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:33:34: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


114-114: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:35:36: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


158-158: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:16:22: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 70630ac and 185d731.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/types.yaml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
.github/workflows/types.yaml (1)
Learnt from: 0xDEnYO
PR: lifinance/contracts#879
File: .github/workflows/types.yaml:58-62
Timestamp: 2024-11-27T04:28:26.318Z
Learning: In the file `.github/workflows/types.yaml`, additional error handling for file operations is not required in the 'Copy Type Bindings and ABI' step.
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/types.yaml

71-71: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2162:info:10:11: read without -r will mangle backslashes

(shellcheck)


71-71: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2046:warning:16:13: Quote this to prevent word splitting

(shellcheck)


71-71: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:33:34: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


114-114: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:35:36: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


158-158: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:16:22: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

🔇 Additional comments (5)
.github/workflows/types.yaml (5)

13-13: LGTM! Required permission added for tag management.

The addition of write permissions for contents is necessary for pushing new tags.


16-37: LGTM! Well-structured setup with pinned action versions.

The setup steps are clearly organized with descriptive names and use specific versions for actions, which is a good practice for stability.


81-87: Fix shell script issues in beta version handling.

The read command should use the -r flag to prevent backslash mangling.

- while read ITEM; do
+ while read -r ITEM; do

97-101: LGTM! Robust version format validation added.

The semver format validation is a good addition that will prevent issues with invalid version formats.


170-172: LGTM! Tag creation and pushing logic.

The tag creation and pushing logic is functional and handles both main branch and feature branch scenarios appropriately.

.github/workflows/types.yaml Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/types.yaml (1)

30-37: Consider adding caching for Node.js dependencies.

Adding caching for Node.js dependencies could significantly improve workflow execution time.

Add these steps before installing dependencies:

- name: Cache Node.js dependencies
  uses: actions/cache@v3
  with:
    path: |
      node_modules
      */*/node_modules
    key: ${{ runner.os }}-yarn-${{ hashFiles('**/yarn.lock') }}
    restore-keys: |
      ${{ runner.os }}-yarn-
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 185d731 and 067252e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/types.yaml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
.github/workflows/types.yaml (1)
Learnt from: 0xDEnYO
PR: lifinance/contracts#879
File: .github/workflows/types.yaml:58-62
Timestamp: 2024-11-27T04:28:26.318Z
Learning: In the file `.github/workflows/types.yaml`, additional error handling for file operations is not required in the 'Copy Type Bindings and ABI' step.
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/types.yaml

71-71: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2162:info:10:11: read without -r will mangle backslashes

(shellcheck)


71-71: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2046:warning:16:13: Quote this to prevent word splitting

(shellcheck)


71-71: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:33:34: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


114-114: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:40:36: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


163-163: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:16:22: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

🔇 Additional comments (6)
.github/workflows/types.yaml (6)

13-13: LGTM: Required permission for tag management.

The write permission for contents is necessary to push new tags to the repository.


16-45: LGTM: Well-structured setup with pinned action versions.

The setup steps are logically ordered and use specific versions of actions, which is good for reproducibility.


48-62: LGTM: Repository setup and file operations.

The repository checkout and file operations are correctly configured.


106-151: LGTM: Robust version update logic.

The version increment logic properly handles different scenarios:

  • Major version for "major" in commit message
  • Minor version for "feat" in commit message
  • Patch version for other changes
  • Beta version for non-main branches
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

114-114: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:40:36: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


156-177: LGTM: Version update and tag push logic.

The git configuration and version update process are properly implemented.

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

163-163: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:16:22: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


81-87: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix shell script issues in beta version handling.

The read command should use the -r flag to prevent backslash mangling.

- while read ITEM; do
+ while read -r ITEM; do

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

@0xDEnYO 0xDEnYO enabled auto-merge (squash) November 27, 2024 08:01
.github/workflows/types.yaml Show resolved Hide resolved
@0xDEnYO 0xDEnYO merged commit 4fd69fe into main Nov 27, 2024
22 of 25 checks passed
@0xDEnYO 0xDEnYO deleted the fixTypesAction#5 branch November 27, 2024 10:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants