fix: group & proposal theme and layout #41
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request involves the deletion of the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #41 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 58.38% 59.46% +1.07%
==========================================
Files 148 147 -1
Lines 14334 14318 -16
==========================================
+ Hits 8369 8514 +145
+ Misses 5965 5804 -161 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚨 Try these New Features:
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (14)
components/groups/components/__tests__/groupProposals.test.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-142: Consider adding theme-related test coverage.Since this PR focuses on theming improvements, consider adding test cases to verify:
- Component rendering in both dark and light modes
- Proper application of theme colors
- Hover state styling for interactive elements
Example test case:
test('applies correct theme styles', () => { const { rerender } = renderWithChainProvider( <ProposalsForPolicy {...mockProps} />, { theme: 'light' } ); // Verify light theme styles const element = screen.getByTestId('proposals-container'); expect(element).toHaveClass('bg-light-theme'); // Verify dark theme styles rerender( <ProposalsForPolicy {...mockProps} />, { theme: 'dark' } ); expect(element).toHaveClass('bg-dark-theme'); });tailwind.config.js (2)
117-118: Review tooltip color consistency across themes.The tooltip color is set to white (
#ffffff) in both themes, which might not be optimal for the light theme. Consider using theme-specific colors for better visibility.light: { // ... - 'tooltip-color': '#ffffff', + 'tooltip-color': '#161616', // ... }
96-99: Consider theme-specific status colors.The status colors (info, success, warning, error) are identical in both themes. While this maintains consistency, consider adjusting their brightness or saturation for better visibility in dark mode.
For dark theme, consider slightly brighter variants:
dark: { // ... - info: '#3F51B5', - success: '#4CAF50', - warning: '#FFB300', - error: '#E53935', + info: '#5C6BC0', + success: '#66BB6A', + warning: '#FFCA28', + error: '#EF5350', }Also applies to: 119-122
components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx (3)
Line range hint
86-95: Consider using Tailwind classes for font stylesInstead of using inline styles for font properties, consider using Tailwind's utility classes for better maintainability and consistency.
- style={{ fontSize: '20px', fontWeight: 700, lineHeight: '24px' }} + className="text-secondary-content text-xl font-bold leading-6"
124-152: Add tests for skeleton loading UIThe skeleton loading UI is not covered by tests. Consider adding tests to verify proper rendering of the loading state.
Would you like me to help generate test cases for the skeleton loading UI? Here's what we should test:
- Verify skeleton renders when isLoading is true
- Verify correct number of skeleton rows (12)
- Verify skeleton doesn't render when isLoading is false
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 126-150: components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx#L126-L150
Added lines #L126 - L150 were not covered by tests
Line range hint
227-269: Improve accessibility for clickable rowsWhile the styling is consistent, consider these accessibility improvements:
- Add role="button" to the row
- Add keyboard navigation support
- Add aria-label for better screen reader support
<tr - className="group text-black dark:text-white rounded-lg cursor-pointer transition-colors" + className="group text-black dark:text-white rounded-lg cursor-pointer transition-colors focus:outline-none focus:ring-2 focus:ring-primary" + role="button" + tabIndex={0} + aria-label={`Select group ${groupName}`} onClick={e => { e.stopPropagation(); onSelectGroup(policyAddress, groupName, ...); }} + onKeyDown={e => { + if (e.key === 'Enter' || e.key === ' ') { + e.preventDefault(); + onSelectGroup(policyAddress, groupName, ...); + } + }} >components/groups/components/groupProposals.tsx (3)
Line range hint
244-268: Add ARIA labels for better accessibilityThe header buttons lack proper accessibility attributes which could make navigation difficult for screen reader users.
Apply these changes to improve accessibility:
- <button onClick={onBack} className="btn btn-circle rounded-[16px] bg-secondary btn-md"> + <button + onClick={onBack} + className="btn btn-circle rounded-[16px] bg-secondary btn-md" + aria-label="Go back" + > <ArrowRightIcon className="text-primary" /> </button> <button className="btn w-[140px] h-[52px] rounded-[12px] focus:outline-none dark:bg-[#FFFFFF0F] bg-[#0000000A]" onClick={openInfoModal} + aria-label="Open group information" > Info </button> <button className="btn w-[140px] h-[52px] rounded-[12px] focus:outline-none dark:bg-[#FFFFFF0F] bg-[#0000000A]" onClick={openMemberModal} + aria-label="Open member management" > Members </button>
269-287: Enhance search input with debouncingThe search functionality directly updates on every keystroke, which could cause performance issues with large datasets.
Consider implementing debouncing:
+import { useCallback } from 'react'; +import debounce from 'lodash/debounce'; const [searchTerm, setSearchTerm] = useState(''); +const debouncedSearch = useCallback( + debounce((value: string) => { + setSearchTerm(value); + }, 300), + [] +); <input type="text" placeholder="Search for a proposal..." className="input input-bordered w-[224px] h-[40px] rounded-[12px] border-none bg-secondary text-secondary-content pl-10" - value={searchTerm} - onChange={e => setSearchTerm(e.target.value)} + defaultValue={searchTerm} + onChange={e => debouncedSearch(e.target.value)} + aria-label="Search proposals" />
Line range hint
357-388: Improve table accessibility and keyboard navigationThe table rows are clickable but lack proper keyboard navigation support and ARIA attributes.
Apply these changes to improve accessibility:
<tr key={proposal.id.toString()} onClick={() => handleRowClick(proposal)} - className="group text-black dark:text-white rounded-lg cursor-pointer" + className="group text-black dark:text-white rounded-lg cursor-pointer focus-within:ring-2 focus-within:ring-primary" + role="button" + tabIndex={0} + onKeyPress={(e) => { + if (e.key === 'Enter' || e.key === ' ') { + handleRowClick(proposal); + } + }} + aria-label={`Proposal ${proposal.id}: ${proposal.title}`} >Also, consider adding a
role="status"to the loading spinner and empty state message for better screen reader support.components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx (5)
69-69: Theme colors should be defined in the theme configurationThe hardcoded color values (
#FFFFFF,#161616) and chart colors should be moved to the theme configuration for better maintainability and consistency.Consider moving these values to your theme configuration:
- const textColor = theme === 'dark' ? '#FFFFFF' : '#161616'; + const textColor = theme === 'dark' ? colors.dark.text : colors.light.text; - colors: ['#4CAF50', '#E53935', '#FFB300', '#3F51B5'], + colors: theme === 'dark' + ? colors.dark.chart + : colors.light.chart,Also applies to: 188-188
515-516: Improve table accessibility and responsivenessThe table implementation could be enhanced for better accessibility and mobile responsiveness.
- Add
role="table"for better screen reader support- Consider using CSS Grid for better mobile layout
- Add proper ARIA labels for the table cells
- <div className="bg-base-300 rounded-[12px] p-4 w-full"> - <div className="overflow-x-auto w-full min-h-64 max-h-[22.5rem] overflow-y-auto"> - <table className="table-auto w-full text-sm"> + <div className="bg-base-300 rounded-[12px] p-4 w-full"> + <div className="overflow-x-auto w-full min-h-64 max-h-[22.5rem] overflow-y-auto"> + <table role="table" className="table-auto w-full text-sm" aria-label="Group Members">Also applies to: 541-541, 545-547
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 515-516: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L515-L516
Added lines #L515 - L516 were not covered by tests
509-511: Consider adding loading states for the chartThe chart rendering doesn't handle loading states, which could lead to a poor user experience during data fetching.
+ const [isChartLoading, setIsChartLoading] = useState(true); <div className="bg-base-300 rounded-[12px] w-full"> + {isChartLoading && <div className="loading loading-lg" />} <Chart options={options} series={[{ data: chartData }]} type="bar" height={200} /> </div>🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 509-509: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L509
Added line #L509 was not covered by tests
518-532: Improve table header accessibilityThe table headers could be enhanced for better accessibility and semantic meaning.
- <thead className="text-xs uppercase bg-neutral"> + <thead className="text-xs uppercase bg-neutral" role="rowgroup"> <tr> <th scope="col" + role="columnheader" + aria-sort="none" className="px-6 py-3 first:rounded-tl-[12px] text-primary-content" > Address </th>🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 518-518: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L518
Added line #L518 was not covered by tests
[warning] 520-522: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L520-L522
Added lines #L520 - L522 were not covered by tests
[warning] 526-526: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L526
Added line #L526 was not covered by tests
[warning] 529-531: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L529-L531
Added lines #L529 - L531 were not covered by tests
133-135: Chart legend markers configuration could be simplifiedThe current chart legend marker configuration can be simplified using the theme's color palette.
- markers: { - strokeWidth: 0, - }, + markers: { + strokeWidth: 0, + fillColors: theme === 'dark' ? colors.dark.chart : colors.light.chart, + },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
components/admins/components/__tests__/adminOptions.test.tsx(0 hunks)components/admins/components/adminOptions.tsx(0 hunks)components/admins/components/index.tsx(0 hunks)components/groups/components/CountdownTimer.tsx(1 hunks)components/groups/components/__tests__/groupProposals.test.tsx(1 hunks)components/groups/components/groupProposals.tsx(4 hunks)components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx(5 hunks)components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx(10 hunks)tailwind.config.js(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- components/admins/components/tests/adminOptions.test.tsx
- components/admins/components/adminOptions.tsx
- components/admins/components/index.tsx
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- components/groups/components/CountdownTimer.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx
[warning] 126-150: components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx#L126-L150
Added lines #L126 - L150 were not covered by tests
components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx
[warning] 355-355: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L355
Added line #L355 was not covered by tests
[warning] 357-357: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L357
Added line #L357 was not covered by tests
[warning] 366-366: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L366
Added line #L366 was not covered by tests
[warning] 376-376: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L376
Added line #L376 was not covered by tests
[warning] 380-382: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L380-L382
Added lines #L380 - L382 were not covered by tests
[warning] 461-463: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L461-L463
Added lines #L461 - L463 were not covered by tests
[warning] 467-467: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L467
Added line #L467 was not covered by tests
[warning] 474-475: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L474-L475
Added lines #L474 - L475 were not covered by tests
[warning] 479-480: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L479-L480
Added lines #L479 - L480 were not covered by tests
[warning] 487-487: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L487
Added line #L487 was not covered by tests
[warning] 509-509: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L509
Added line #L509 was not covered by tests
[warning] 515-516: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L515-L516
Added lines #L515 - L516 were not covered by tests
[warning] 518-518: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L518
Added line #L518 was not covered by tests
[warning] 520-522: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L520-L522
Added lines #L520 - L522 were not covered by tests
[warning] 526-526: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L526
Added line #L526 was not covered by tests
[warning] 529-531: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L529-L531
Added lines #L529 - L531 were not covered by tests
🔇 Additional comments (4)
components/groups/components/__tests__/groupProposals.test.tsx (1)
111-111: LGTM! Text update matches UI changes.
The updated assertion correctly reflects the new message displayed when no proposals are found.
tailwind.config.js (2)
81-122: Theme configuration looks good overall!
The updated color scheme provides a consistent visual hierarchy and maintains the purple-based theme identity across both light and dark modes. The changes align well with the PR objectives of fixing theme-related issues.
81-83: Consider accessibility implications of the primary color.
The primary color #A087FF might not provide sufficient contrast against white backgrounds for smaller text elements. Consider using a darker shade for better accessibility or ensuring it's not used for critical text elements.
components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx (1)
Line range hint 355-382: Add test coverage for new UI elements
Several new UI elements and text formatting changes lack test coverage. This includes message rendering, title display, and various text elements.
Would you like me to help create test cases for these new UI elements? I can generate comprehensive tests that cover:
- Theme-based text color rendering
- Message field formatting
- Modal layout responsiveness
Also applies to: 461-463, 467-467, 474-475, 479-480, 487-487
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 376-376: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L376
Added line #L376 was not covered by tests
[warning] 380-382: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L380-L382
Added lines #L380 - L382 were not covered by tests
| @@ -416,21 +421,23 @@ | |||
|
|
|||
| return ( | |||
| <dialog id={modalId} className="modal"> | |||
| <div className="modal-box relative max-w-4xl min-h-96 flex flex-col md:flex-row md:ml-20 -mt-12 rounded-[24px] shadow-lg dark:bg-[#1D192D] bg-[#FFFFFF] transition-all duration-300 z-[1000]"> | |||
| <div className="modal-box relative max-w-4xl min-h-96 max-h-[80vh] overflow-y-hidden flex flex-col md:flex-row md:ml-20 -mt-12 rounded-[24px] shadow-lg bg-secondary transition-all duration-300 z-[1000]"> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve modal positioning and layout
The modal's positioning uses negative margin (-mt-12) which is a fragile solution. Consider using proper positioning techniques.
- <div className="modal-box relative max-w-4xl min-h-96 max-h-[80vh] overflow-y-hidden flex flex-col md:flex-row md:ml-20 -mt-12 rounded-[24px] shadow-lg bg-secondary transition-all duration-300 z-[1000]">
+ <div className="modal-box relative max-w-4xl min-h-96 max-h-[80vh] overflow-y-hidden flex flex-col md:flex-row rounded-[24px] shadow-lg bg-secondary transition-all duration-300">Also applies to: 424-424
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx (1)
Based on the initial search results, I can generate the final response since we found enough context showing:
- The existence of
ProposalMessages.test.tsxwith commented-out message-related tests- The
renderMessageFieldfunction implementation invoteDetailsModal.tsx- No existing test file for
voteDetailsModal.tsxAdd test coverage for message field rendering
The
renderMessageFieldfunction handles complex rendering logic for different types of message fields (arrays, objects, strings) but lacks test coverage. Consider:
- Creating a new test file
voteDetailsModal.test.tsx- Adding test cases for:
- Array type message fields
- Object type message fields
- String fields with address-like content
- Regular string fields with truncation
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
355-382: Add test coverage for message renderingThe
renderMessageFieldfunction and its text styling changes lack test coverage. Consider adding unit tests for different message types and their rendering outcomes.
Let me gather more information about the test coverage and related components.
Let me try one more search with corrected file type flags:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find existing test files for this component fd "voteDetailsModal.test" --type f # Check for any existing message rendering tests rg -A 5 "renderMessageField|test\(.*message"Length of output: 9395
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for test files related to vote details or message rendering fd "test.(tsx|ts)" --type f | rg -i "vote|message" # Check for any existing test setup or utilities for modal testing rg -A 5 "render.*Modal|Modal.*test" --type ts --type tsx # Look for any existing snapshot tests rg "toMatchSnapshot|snapshot" --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 290
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for modal test patterns and snapshots rg -t typescript -t typescriptreact -A 5 "render.*Modal|Modal.*test" # Check for any existing test utilities or helpers fd "test-utils|testing" --type f # Look for similar components with tests rg -t typescript -t typescriptreact "describe.*Modal.*|test.*Modal.*" -A 5Length of output: 252
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 376-376: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L376
Added line #L376 was not covered by tests
[warning] 380-382: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L380-L382
Added lines #L380 - L382 were not covered by tests
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx(10 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx
[warning] 355-355: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L355
Added line #L355 was not covered by tests
[warning] 357-357: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L357
Added line #L357 was not covered by tests
[warning] 366-366: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L366
Added line #L366 was not covered by tests
[warning] 376-376: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L376
Added line #L376 was not covered by tests
[warning] 380-382: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L380-L382
Added lines #L380 - L382 were not covered by tests
[warning] 463-465: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L463-L465
Added lines #L463 - L465 were not covered by tests
[warning] 469-469: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L469
Added line #L469 was not covered by tests
[warning] 476-477: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L476-L477
Added lines #L476 - L477 were not covered by tests
[warning] 481-482: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L481-L482
Added lines #L481 - L482 were not covered by tests
[warning] 489-489: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L489
Added line #L489 was not covered by tests
[warning] 511-511: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L511
Added line #L511 was not covered by tests
[warning] 517-518: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L517-L518
Added lines #L517 - L518 were not covered by tests
[warning] 520-520: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L520
Added line #L520 was not covered by tests
[warning] 522-524: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L522-L524
Added lines #L522 - L524 were not covered by tests
[warning] 528-528: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L528
Added line #L528 was not covered by tests
[warning] 531-533: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L531-L533
Added lines #L531 - L533 were not covered by tests
🔇 Additional comments (2)
components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx (2)
424-428: Previous review comment about modal positioning is still applicable
520-534: LGTM: Table styling follows theme guidelines
The table header styling properly uses theme-aware classes for text colors and maintains consistency.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 520-520: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L520
Added line #L520 was not covered by tests
[warning] 522-524: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L522-L524
Added lines #L522 - L524 were not covered by tests
[warning] 528-528: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L528
Added line #L528 was not covered by tests
[warning] 531-533: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L531-L533
Added lines #L531 - L533 were not covered by tests
| <h1 className="text-2xl font-bold max-w-[20ch] truncate text-primary-content"> | ||
| {proposal?.title} | ||
| </h1> | ||
| <span className="text-sm font-light text-gray-500 dark:text-gray-400 mt-2"> | ||
| SUBMITTED | ||
| </span> | ||
| <span className="text-sm"> | ||
| <span className="text-sm text-primary-content"> | ||
| {new Date(proposal?.submit_time).toDateString().toLocaleString()} | ||
| </span> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div className="divider my-"></div> | ||
| <div className="w-full"> | ||
| <p className="text-sm font-light text-gray-500 dark:text-gray-400 mb-2 ">SUMMARY</p> | ||
| <div className="dark:bg-[#FFFFFF0F] bg-[#0000000A] rounded-[12px] p-4"> | ||
| <p className="text-sm">{proposal?.summary}</p> | ||
| <div className="bg-base-300 rounded-[12px] p-4"> | ||
| <p className="text-sm text-primary-content">{proposal?.summary}</p> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div className="w-full"> | ||
| <p className="text-sm font-light text-gray-500 dark:text-gray-400 mb-2 ">MESSAGES</p> | ||
| <div className="dark:bg-[#FFFFFF0F] bg-[#0000000A] rounded-[12px] p-4 overflow-y-auto max-h-[20rem]"> | ||
| <p className="text-sm font-light text-gray-500 dark:text-gray-400 mb-2">MESSAGES</p> | ||
| <div className="bg-base-300 rounded-[12px] p-4 overflow-y-auto max-h-[20rem]"> | ||
| {proposal?.messages?.map((message: any, index: number) => { | ||
| const messageType = message['@type']; | ||
| const fieldsToShow = importantFields[messageType] || defaultFields; | ||
|
|
||
| return ( | ||
| <div key={index} className="mb-4"> | ||
| <h3 className="text-lg font-semibold mb-2"> | ||
| <h3 className="text-lg font-semibold mb-2 text-primary-content"> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Implement comprehensive UI test coverage
Multiple UI elements lack test coverage. Consider implementing:
- Snapshot tests for theme variations
- Unit tests for conditional rendering
- Integration tests for user interactions
This will help ensure theme and layout changes don't introduce regressions.
Would you like me to help create a test suite template that covers these scenarios?
Also applies to: 511-534
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 463-465: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L463-L465
Added lines #L463 - L465 were not covered by tests
[warning] 469-469: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L469
Added line #L469 was not covered by tests
[warning] 476-477: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L476-L477
Added lines #L476 - L477 were not covered by tests
[warning] 481-482: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L481-L482
Added lines #L481 - L482 were not covered by tests
[warning] 489-489: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L489
Added line #L489 was not covered by tests
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sure, write some tests.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@fmorency, sure! Here's a test suite for the VoteDetailsModal component that covers snapshot tests for theme variations, unit tests for conditional rendering, and placeholders for integration tests of user interactions:
// File: components/groups/modals/__tests__/voteDetailsModal.test.tsx
import React from 'react';
import { render, screen, fireEvent } from '@testing-library/react';
import VoteDetailsModal from '../voteDetailsModal';
import { ChainProvider } from '@/contexts/chain';
import { ProposalSDKType, MemberSDKType, VoteSDKType } from '@liftedinit/manifestjs/dist/codegen/cosmos/group/v1/types';
import { QueryTallyResultResponseSDKType } from '@liftedinit/manifestjs/dist/codegen/cosmos/group/v1/query';
describe('VoteDetailsModal Component Tests', () => {
const mockProposal: ProposalSDKType = {
id: BigInt(1),
address: 'cosmos1address',
proposers: ['cosmos1proposer'],
submit_time: '2023-11-10T00:00:00Z',
voting_period_end: '2023-11-11T00:00:00Z',
status: 'PROPOSAL_STATUS_SUBMITTED',
executor_result: 'PROPOSAL_EXECUTOR_RESULT_NOT_RUN',
title: 'Test Proposal Title',
summary: 'This is a test summary for the proposal.',
messages: [
{
'@type': '/cosmos.bank.v1beta1.MsgSend',
from_address: 'cosmos1from',
to_address: 'cosmos1to',
amount: [{ denom: 'uatom', amount: '1000' }],
},
],
};
const mockTally: QueryTallyResultResponseSDKType = {
tally: {
yes_count: '10',
abstain_count: '2',
no_count: '3',
no_with_veto_count: '1',
},
};
const mockVotes: VoteSDKType[] = [
{
proposal_id: BigInt(1),
voter: 'cosmos1voter1',
option: 'VOTE_OPTION_YES',
metadata: '',
submit_time: '',
},
// Add more mock votes as needed
];
const mockMembers: MemberSDKType[] = [
{
address: 'cosmos1member1',
weight: '1',
metadata: '',
},
// Add more mock members as needed
];
const defaultProps = {
tallies: mockTally,
votes: mockVotes,
members: mockMembers,
proposal: mockProposal,
onClose: jest.fn(),
modalId: 'voteDetailsModal',
refetchVotes: jest.fn(),
refetchTally: jest.fn(),
refetchProposals: jest.fn(),
};
const renderComponent = (props = {}) => {
return render(
<ChainProvider>
<VoteDetailsModal {...defaultProps} {...props} />
</ChainProvider>
);
};
test('renders the component with provided props', () => {
renderComponent();
expect(screen.getByText(`#${mockProposal.id.toString()}`)).toBeInTheDocument();
expect(screen.getByText(mockProposal.title)).toBeInTheDocument();
expect(screen.getByText('SUMMARY')).toBeInTheDocument();
expect(screen.getByText(mockProposal.summary)).toBeInTheDocument();
});
test('renders the tally chart', () => {
renderComponent();
expect(screen.getByText('TALLY')).toBeInTheDocument();
// Additional checks can be implemented based on how the chart renders
});
test('renders voting countdown timer', () => {
renderComponent();
expect(screen.getByText('VOTING COUNTDOWN')).toBeInTheDocument();
});
test('renders messages section with correct data', () => {
renderComponent();
expect(screen.getByText('MESSAGES')).toBeInTheDocument();
expect(screen.getByText('MsgSend')).toBeInTheDocument();
expect(screen.getByText('from_address:')).toBeInTheDocument();
expect(screen.getByText('to_address:')).toBeInTheDocument();
});
test('conditionally renders execute button when proposal is accepted', () => {
renderComponent({
proposal: { ...mockProposal, status: 'PROPOSAL_STATUS_ACCEPTED' },
});
expect(screen.getByText('Execute')).toBeInTheDocument();
});
test('conditionally renders vote button when proposal is open and user has not voted', () => {
renderComponent();
expect(screen.getByText('Vote')).toBeInTheDocument();
});
test('does not render vote button when user has already voted', () => {
renderComponent({
votes: [{ ...mockVotes[0], voter: 'cosmos1address' }], // Assuming cosmos1address is the current user
});
expect(screen.queryByText('Vote')).not.toBeInTheDocument();
});
test('handles vote button click and opens voting modal', () => {
renderComponent();
const voteButton = screen.getByText('Vote');
fireEvent.click(voteButton);
expect(document.getElementById('vote_modal')).toBeVisible();
});
test('handles execute button click', () => {
// Implement test logic for execute action
});
test('matches snapshot for light theme', () => {
renderComponent();
expect(screen.baseElement).toMatchSnapshot();
});
test('matches snapshot for dark theme', () => {
// Assuming a ThemeProvider or context to change the theme
renderComponent();
expect(screen.baseElement).toMatchSnapshot();
});
});This test suite includes:
- Snapshot Tests: Ensuring the component's render output matches the expected snapshots for both light and dark themes.
- Unit Tests for Conditional Rendering: Testing the visibility of buttons and sections based on different proposal statuses and user actions.
- Integration Tests Placeholders: Places where you can implement tests for user interactions like executing a proposal or voting.
These tests will help ensure that theme and layout changes don't introduce regressions.
Let me know if you need any further assistance or additional tests!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I will integrate those in a future PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@fmorency, understood. Would you like me to open a GitHub issue to track adding the tests in a future PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@fmorency, I've opened a GitHub issue to track adding tests for the VoteDetailsModal component as discussed:
This will help ensure that theme and layout changes don't introduce regressions in the future.
🔗 Analysis chain
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Create a GitHub issue to track adding tests for VoteDetailsModal component
gh issue create \
--title "Add tests for VoteDetailsModal component" \
--body "As per the discussion in [PR #41](https://github.com/liftedinit/manifest-app/pull/41), we should add a test suite for the `VoteDetailsModal` component to cover snapshot tests for theme variations, unit tests for conditional rendering, and integration tests for user interactions.
Refer to the code review comment: https://github.com/liftedinit/manifest-app/pull/41#discussion_r1843838029
Requested by: @fmorency" \
--assignee "fmorency"
Length of output: 650
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I added the tests in commit abb9199
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Félix C. Morency <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx (2)
124-152: Add test coverage for skeleton loading stateThe skeleton loading implementation looks good, but test coverage is missing for this section.
Would you like me to help generate test cases for the skeleton loading state? This should include:
- Verifying skeleton renders when isLoading is true
- Checking correct number of skeleton rows
- Validating skeleton styling classes
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 126-150: components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx#L126-L150
Added lines #L126 - L150 were not covered by tests
Line range hint
227-238: Enhance keyboard accessibilityWhile the styling improvements look good, consider adding keyboard accessibility for better user experience.
<tr className="group text-black dark:text-white rounded-lg cursor-pointer transition-colors" + role="button" + tabIndex={0} + onKeyDown={(e) => { + if (e.key === 'Enter' || e.key === ' ') { + e.preventDefault(); + onSelectGroup( + policyAddress, + groupName, + (group.policies && + (group.policies[0]?.decision_policy as ThresholdDecisionPolicySDKType)?.threshold) ?? + '0' + ); + } + }} onClick={e => {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx(5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx
[warning] 126-150: components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx#L126-L150
Added lines #L126 - L150 were not covered by tests
🔇 Additional comments (3)
components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx (3)
Line range hint 86-95: LGTM: Theme-consistent styling applied
The updated styling for the title and search input properly utilizes theme colors, ensuring visibility in both dark and light modes.
112-122: Skip comment about column width inconsistency
247-249: LGTM: Improved badge visibility
The badge styling now properly uses theme colors for better visibility.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
components/groups/modals/__tests__/voteDetailsModal.test.tsx (2)
26-35: Enhance mock setup for better test coverageThe current mock setup could be improved in the following ways:
- The ApexCharts mock should verify chart rendering props
- The useChain mock should be more flexible to support different test scenarios
Consider updating the mocks:
mock.module('react-apexcharts', () => ({ - default: jest.fn(), + default: jest.fn().mockImplementation(({ options, series }) => ( + <div data-testid="mock-chart" data-options={JSON.stringify(options)} data-series={JSON.stringify(series)} /> + )), })); +const mockUseChain = jest.fn().mockReturnValue({ + address: mockProposals['test_policy_address'][0].proposers[0], + chain: { fees: null }, +}); mock.module('@cosmos-kit/react', () => ({ - useChain: jest.fn().mockReturnValue({ - address: mockProposals['test_policy_address'][0].proposers[0], - chain: { fees: null }, - }), + useChain: mockUseChain, }));
40-50: Add type safety to defaultPropsThe defaultProps object would benefit from explicit typing to catch potential type mismatches early.
Consider adding type interface:
interface VoteDetailsModalProps { tallies: QueryTallyResultResponseSDKType; votes: VoteSDKType[]; members: MemberSDKType[]; proposal: ProposalSDKType; onClose: () => void; modalId: string; refetchVotes: () => void; refetchTally: () => void; refetchProposals: () => void; } const defaultProps: VoteDetailsModalProps = { // ... existing props };tests/mock.ts (1)
459-496: Consider enhancing mock data coverageThe new mock data structures are well-structured, but consider these improvements:
- Add more diverse voting scenarios in
mockVotes(e.g., NO, ABSTAIN, NO_WITH_VETO options)- Include edge cases in
mockMembers(e.g., member with zero weight, member with very large weight)Example additions:
export const mockVotes = [ // ... existing votes ... + { + proposal_id: 1n, + voter: 'manifest1edge', + option: VoteOption.VOTE_OPTION_NO_WITH_VETO, + metadata: 'metadata3', + submit_time: new Date(), + }, ]; export const mockMembers = [ // ... existing members ... + { + address: 'manifest1edge', + name: 'Edge Case Member', + weight: '1000000', // Large weight + }, + { + address: 'manifest1zero', + name: 'Zero Weight Member', + weight: '0', + }, ];components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx (5)
Line range hint
355-382: Improve message field rendering accessibilityWhile the text color changes improve visibility, consider adding ARIA labels for better screen reader support.
- <h4 className="font-medium text-primary-content">{key}:</h4> + <h4 className="font-medium text-primary-content" aria-label={`Field ${key}`}>{key}:</h4> - <div key={index} className="ml-4 text-primary-content"> + <div key={index} className="ml-4 text-primary-content" role="listitem">
476-489: Enhance content readabilityThe use of
text-primary-contentimproves text visibility, but consider adding a max-width to improve readability of long summaries.- <div className="bg-base-300 rounded-[12px] p-4"> + <div className="bg-base-300 rounded-[12px] p-4 max-w-prose">
511-534: Improve table accessibility and responsivenessWhile the table styling is improved, consider adding more accessibility features and responsive behavior.
- <table className="table-auto w-full text-sm"> + <table className="table-auto w-full text-sm" role="grid" aria-label="Members voting details"> - <div className="overflow-x-auto w-full min-h-64 max-h-[22.5rem] overflow-y-auto"> + <div className="overflow-x-auto w-full min-h-64 max-h-[22.5rem] overflow-y-auto scrollbar-thin scrollbar-thumb-base-300">
Line range hint
559-568: Enhance button interaction feedbackThe button state handling is good, but consider adding loading state feedback for better UX.
disabled={ isSigning || (getButtonState.action === 'remove' && !proposal?.proposers?.includes(address ?? '')) } - className="btn w-full btn-primary text-white rounded-[12px]" + className={`btn w-full btn-primary text-white rounded-[12px] ${ + isSigning ? 'loading' : '' + }`}
Test coverage exists but needs enhancement for message rendering
While there is a basic test for the messages section (
renders messages section with correct data), it only verifies the presence of basic fields. TherenderMessageFieldfunction handles complex nested structures, arrays, and special cases (like truncated addresses) that aren't currently tested.Key areas needing test coverage:
- Nested object rendering with different depths
- Array rendering with multiple items
- Address truncation for long strings
- Different value types handling (strings, numbers, objects)
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
355-489: Add test coverage for message renderingThe static analysis indicates missing test coverage for the message rendering functionality.
Would you like me to help create test cases for the message rendering functionality?
Let me check the content of the test file to verify the test coverage.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check test coverage for message rendering # Test: Search for existing tests rg -A 5 "renderMessageField|test\(.*message.*\)" --type ts --type tsx # Test: Check if there are any test files for this component fd -e test.tsx -e test.ts -e spec.tsx -e spec.ts voteDetailsModalLength of output: 228
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of the test file cat components/groups/modals/__tests__/voteDetailsModal.test.tsx # Also search for any message rendering related tests in the entire codebase rg -g '*.{ts,tsx}' "renderMessageField|test.*message"Length of output: 6413
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
components/groups/modals/__tests__/voteDetailsModal.test.tsx(1 hunks)components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx(13 hunks)components/groups/modals/voteModal.tsx(1 hunks)tests/mock.ts(3 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- components/groups/modals/voteModal.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx
[warning] 355-355: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L355
Added line #L355 was not covered by tests
[warning] 357-357: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L357
Added line #L357 was not covered by tests
[warning] 366-366: components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx#L366
Added line #L366 was not covered by tests
🔇 Additional comments (4)
tests/mock.ts (2)
10-14: LGTM: Import statements are properly organized
The new imports for MemberSDKType and VoteOption are correctly placed and support the new mock data structures.
524-524: LGTM: Good reuse of mock data
Using mockMembers in mockGroupFormData improves maintainability and ensures consistency across tests.
components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx (2)
133-135: LGTM: Chart legend styling improvements
The addition of strokeWidth: 0 for legend markers improves the visual clarity of the chart.
424-428: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve modal positioning and layout
The modal's positioning uses negative margin (-mt-12) which is a fragile solution and may cause layout issues on different screen sizes.
- <div className="modal-box relative max-w-4xl min-h-96 max-h-[80vh] overflow-y-hidden flex flex-col md:flex-row md:ml-20 -mt-12 rounded-[24px] shadow-lg bg-secondary transition-all duration-300 z-[1000]">
+ <div className="modal-box relative max-w-4xl min-h-96 max-h-[80vh] overflow-y-hidden flex flex-col md:flex-row rounded-[24px] shadow-lg bg-secondary transition-all duration-300">Likely invalid or redundant comment.
| test('renders the component with provided props', () => { | ||
| renderWithChainProvider(<VoteDetailsModal {...defaultProps} />); | ||
| expect(screen.getByText(`#${mockProposal.id.toString()}`)).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| expect(screen.getByText(mockProposal.title)).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| expect(screen.getByText('SUMMARY')).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| expect(screen.getByText(mockProposal.summary)).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test('renders the tally chart', () => { | ||
| renderWithChainProvider(<VoteDetailsModal {...defaultProps} />); | ||
| expect(screen.getByLabelText('chart-tally')).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test('renders voting countdown timer', () => { | ||
| renderWithChainProvider(<VoteDetailsModal {...defaultProps} />); | ||
| expect(screen.getByLabelText('voting-countdown-1')).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| expect(screen.getByLabelText('voting-countdown-2')).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test('renders messages section with correct data', () => { | ||
| renderWithChainProvider(<VoteDetailsModal {...defaultProps} />); | ||
| expect(screen.getByText('MESSAGES')).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| expect(screen.getByText('Send')).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| expect(screen.getByText('from_address:')).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| expect(screen.getByText('to_address:')).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test('conditionally renders execute button when proposal is accepted', () => { | ||
| const props = { | ||
| ...defaultProps, | ||
| proposal: { | ||
| ...mockProposal, | ||
| status: 'PROPOSAL_STATUS_ACCEPTED', | ||
| executor_result: 'PROPOSAL_EXECUTOR_RESULT_NOT_RUN', | ||
| }, | ||
| }; | ||
| renderWithChainProvider(<VoteDetailsModal {...props} />); | ||
| expect(screen.getByText('Execute')).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test('conditionally renders vote button when proposal is open and user has not voted', () => { | ||
| renderWithChainProvider(<VoteDetailsModal {...defaultProps} />); | ||
| expect(screen.getByText('Vote')).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test('does not render vote button when user has already voted', () => { | ||
| const props = { ...defaultProps, votes: [{ ...mockVotes[0], voter: 'proposer1' }] }; | ||
| renderWithChainProvider(<VoteDetailsModal {...props} />); | ||
| const btn = screen.getByLabelText('action-btn'); | ||
| expect(btn.textContent).not.toBe('Vote'); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test('handles vote button click and opens voting modal', async () => { | ||
| renderWithChainProvider(<VoteDetailsModal {...defaultProps} />); | ||
| const voteButton = screen.getByText('Vote'); | ||
| fireEvent.click(voteButton); | ||
| await waitFor(() => expect(screen.getByLabelText('vote-modal')).toBeInTheDocument()); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add test coverage for edge cases and error scenarios
The current test suite covers happy paths but is missing important scenarios:
- Error states (e.g., failed proposal execution)
- Loading states
- Network error handling
- Verification that refetch functions are called after actions
Add these test cases:
test('displays error state when proposal execution fails', async () => {
const mockError = new Error('Execution failed');
const executeProposal = jest.fn().mockRejectedValue(mockError);
renderWithChainProvider(
<VoteDetailsModal {...defaultProps} executeProposal={executeProposal} />
);
const executeButton = screen.getByText('Execute');
fireEvent.click(executeButton);
await waitFor(() => {
expect(screen.getByText(/execution failed/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
});
});
test('calls refetch functions after successful vote', async () => {
renderWithChainProvider(<VoteDetailsModal {...defaultProps} />);
const voteButton = screen.getByText('Vote');
fireEvent.click(voteButton);
// Mock successful vote submission
const submitButton = await screen.findByText('Submit');
fireEvent.click(submitButton);
await waitFor(() => {
expect(defaultProps.refetchVotes).toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(defaultProps.refetchTally).toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(defaultProps.refetchProposals).toHaveBeenCalled();
});
});| @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ | |||
|
|
|||
| const { theme } = useTheme(); | |||
|
|
|||
| const textColor = theme === 'dark' ? '#E0D1D4' : '#2e2e2e'; | |||
| const textColor = theme === 'dark' ? '#FFFFFF' : '#161616'; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use theme variables instead of hardcoded colors
The hardcoded colors bypass the theme system. Consider using Tailwind's theme variables for better maintainability and theme consistency.
- const textColor = theme === 'dark' ? '#FFFFFF' : '#161616';
+ const textColor = theme === 'dark' ? 'rgb(var(--color-neutral-content))' : 'rgb(var(--color-base-content))';
// ...
- colors: ['#4CAF50', '#E53935', '#FFB300', '#3F51B5'],
+ colors: ['rgb(var(--color-success))', 'rgb(var(--color-error))', 'rgb(var(--color-warning))', 'rgb(var(--color-info))'],Also applies to: 188-188
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
tailwind.config.js (2)
Line range hint
13-15: LGTM! Consider performance impact of animationsThe new screen breakpoints, shadows, and animations are well-structured. The animations use appropriate timing (300-400ms) for smooth transitions.
Consider adding
will-changehints for optimized animation performance, especially for mobile devices:animation: { - fadeIn: 'fadeIn 400ms ease-in', + fadeIn: 'fadeIn 400ms ease-in will-change-opacity', - fadeSlideUp: 'fadeSlideUp 400ms ease-in', + fadeSlideUp: 'fadeSlideUp 400ms ease-in will-change-transform', // ... apply to other slide animations },Also applies to: 16-19, 20-28, 29-63
Line range hint
138-196: LGTM! Consider enhancing hover transitionsThe custom utility classes are well-structured with proper handling of hover and disabled states.
Consider adding transition properties for smoother hover effects:
'.btn-dropdown': { backgroundColor: '#E0E0FF0A', border: '1px solid #00000033', - transition: 'all 0.3s ease', + transition: 'all 0.3s ease, box-shadow 0.2s ease-in-out', '@apply dark:bg-[#E0E0FF0A] dark:border-[#FFFFFF33]': {},components/groups/modals/groupInfo.tsx (2)
Line range hint
183-191: Consider refactoring address display logicWhile the styling changes look good, there's some duplication in the address display logic that could be simplified.
Consider refactoring the responsive address display like this:
- <p className="text-sm text-[#00000099] dark:text-[#FFFFFF99] xs:block hidden"> - <TruncatedAddressWithCopy address={value} slice={24} /> - </p> - <p className="text-sm text-[#00000099] dark:text-[#FFFFFF99] xs:hidden block"> - <TruncatedAddressWithCopy address={value} slice={14} /> - </p> + <p className="text-sm text-[#00000099] dark:text-[#FFFFFF99]"> + <TruncatedAddressWithCopy + address={value} + slice={window.innerWidth >= 320 ? 24 : 14} + /> + </p>This would reduce code duplication while maintaining the same functionality. You might want to use a proper React hook like
useWindowSizefor better reactivity.
Line range hint
1-196: Consider enhancing modal accessibilityWhile the theming changes look great, consider adding these accessibility improvements:
- Add
aria-labelto the close button- Add
role="dialog"andaria-labelledbyto the modal- Ensure focus is properly trapped within the modal when open
Example implementation:
- <dialog id={modalId} className="modal"> + <dialog id={modalId} className="modal" role="dialog" aria-labelledby="modal-title"> <div className="modal-box bg-secondary rounded-[24px] max-h-[574px] max-w-[542px] p-6"> <div className="flex items-center justify-between mb-6"> <div className="flex items-center space-x-4"> <ProfileAvatar walletAddress={policyAddress} size={40} /> - <h3 className="font-bold text-lg">{group.ipfsMetadata?.title}</h3> + <h3 id="modal-title" className="font-bold text-lg">{group.ipfsMetadata?.title}</h3> </div> <form method="dialog"> - <button className="absolute top-3 right-3 btn btn-sm btn-circle btn-ghost text-black dark:text-white outline-none"> + <button + className="absolute top-3 right-3 btn btn-sm btn-circle btn-ghost text-black dark:text-white outline-none" + aria-label="Close modal" + > ✕ </button> </form>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
components/groups/components/groupProposals.tsx(5 hunks)components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx(5 hunks)components/groups/modals/groupInfo.tsx(3 hunks)tailwind.config.js(1 hunks)tests/mock.ts(3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- components/groups/components/groupProposals.tsx
- components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx
- tests/mock.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
components/groups/modals/groupInfo.tsx (1)
Learnt from: chalabi2
PR: liftedinit/manifest-app#9
File: components/groups/modals/groupInfo.tsx:121-155
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T13:03:18.927Z
Learning: When reviewing the `InfoItem` component in `components/groups/modals/groupInfo.tsx`, avoid suggesting enhancements for typings and accessibility if the current implementation is sufficient, as addresses and names are always fetched from the chain as implemented.
🔇 Additional comments (5)
tailwind.config.js (2)
109-127: LGTM! Good color consistency between themes
The dark theme updates maintain consistency with the light theme while providing appropriate contrast levels. The hierarchical background colors (#0E0A1F, #161616, #1D192D, #272336) create good visual depth.
86-104: Verify contrast ratios for light theme colors
The updated color scheme addresses the visibility issues mentioned in Issue #32. The new colors appear to provide better contrast.
Let's verify the contrast ratios meet WCAG standards:
components/groups/modals/groupInfo.tsx (3)
107-109: LGTM! Improved button visibility across themes
The close button styling changes properly handle both light and dark themes while maintaining accessibility.
114-114: LGTM! Proper theme integration
The Info section header now correctly uses the theme's secondary content color.
140-140: LGTM! Consistent theme usage
The Authors section header matches the Info section's styling, maintaining visual consistency.
| @@ -97,19 +97,21 @@ export function GroupInfo({ modalId, group, policyAddress, address, onUpdate }: | |||
|
|
|||
| return ( | |||
| <dialog id={modalId} className="modal"> | |||
| <div className="modal-box bg-[#FFFFFF] dark:bg-[#1D192D] rounded-[24px] max-h-['574px'] max-w-[542px] p-6"> | |||
| <div className="modal-box bg-secondary rounded-[24px] max-h-['574px'] max-w-[542px] p-6"> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix incorrect CSS max-height syntax
The max-height property has incorrect quotes which could prevent the style from being applied correctly.
- <div className="modal-box bg-secondary rounded-[24px] max-h-['574px'] max-w-[542px] p-6">
+ <div className="modal-box bg-secondary rounded-[24px] max-h-[574px] max-w-[542px] p-6">📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <div className="modal-box bg-secondary rounded-[24px] max-h-['574px'] max-w-[542px] p-6"> | |
| <div className="modal-box bg-secondary rounded-[24px] max-h-[574px] max-w-[542px] p-6"> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
components/groups/forms/proposals/ConfirmationForm.tsx (3)
Line range hint
42-42: Consider using TypeScript interfaces for metadata structureThe proposal metadata structure is used in multiple places but lacks type definitions. Consider extracting it into a shared interface:
interface ProposalMetadata { title: string; authors: string; summary: string; details: string; proposalForumURL: string; voteOptionContext: string; }Also applies to: 91-91
Line range hint
89-116: Enhance error handling in getMessageObjectThe error handling is good but could be more informative for debugging:
if (!composedMessage || !composedMessage.value) { - console.error('Composed message or its value is undefined:', composedMessage); + console.error('Failed to compose message:', { + type: message.type, + data: messageData, + result: composedMessage + }); throw new Error(`Failed to compose message for type: ${message.type}`); }
Line range hint
155-158: Consider metadata privacy implicationsThe metadata is being uploaded to IPFS which is a public network. Consider:
- Warning users about the public nature of IPFS data
- Implementing content validation before upload
- Adding size limits to prevent DoS attacks
components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx (1)
170-200: Add test coverage for skeleton loading statesThe skeleton loading states have been properly themed, but we should ensure they're properly tested, especially with the new button sizes.
Would you like me to help generate test cases for the skeleton loading states?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
components/groups/components/groupProposals.tsx(4 hunks)components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx(5 hunks)components/groups/forms/proposals/ConfirmationForm.tsx(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- components/groups/components/groupProposals.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx
[warning] 351-352: components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx#L351-L352
Added lines #L351 - L352 were not covered by tests
🔇 Additional comments (5)
components/groups/forms/proposals/ConfirmationForm.tsx (2)
Line range hint 223-279: Well-implemented theme support
The UI implementation shows excellent attention to detail with proper dark/light theme support using Tailwind CSS classes. The consistent use of color variables and proper contrast ratios enhances accessibility.
191-191: Verify the implications of changing exec mode to 0
The change from exec: 1 to exec: 0 means proposals will require a separate execution step after approval instead of automatic execution. While this might be intentional for additional safety, the comment "For now" suggests this is temporary.
Consider:
- Document the rationale for this change in the code comments
- Create a tracking issue for revisiting this decision
- Update user documentation to reflect the manual execution requirement
✅ Verification successful
Setting exec: 0 is consistent with the codebase pattern
The verification shows that exec: 0 is consistently used across all group proposals and admin operations in the codebase, including:
- Group management (update group, member management)
- Factory operations (minting, burning)
- Admin operations (validator, staking params)
- Vote modal and proposal messages
This indicates the change is aligned with the established pattern rather than being a temporary deviation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other instances of exec flag usage to ensure consistency
rg -A 2 'exec:.*[01]'
# Search for related documentation that might need updates
fd -e md -e mdx | xargs rg -l 'proposal.*execution'
Length of output: 2785
components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx (3)
Line range hint 328-386: LGTM! Theme improvements look good
The group row styling changes properly implement:
- Consistent use of theme colors
- Proper hover states
- Semantic color classes for better theme support
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 351-352: components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx#L351-L352
Added lines #L351 - L352 were not covered by tests
351-353: Add test coverage for active proposals badge
The active proposals badge implementation lacks test coverage. Please add tests to verify the badge's appearance and behavior.
Let's check for existing tests:
Would you like me to help generate test cases for the active proposals badge component?
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 351-352: components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx#L351-L352
Added lines #L351 - L352 were not covered by tests
Line range hint 123-132: Adjust search box position per Issue #40
While the theme colors have been properly updated, the search box position doesn't match the requirements from Issue #40. The search box should be positioned to the right of the "Proposals" title.
Let's verify if this is the only search box in the component:
This PR
adminOptionscomponent and testsGrouppage dark and light theming to use theme colorsFixes #40
Fixes #47
Partially fixes #32
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
AdminOptionscomponent, streamlining the admin interface.Bug Fixes
UI Improvements
CountdownTimer,GroupProposals,myGroups, andVoteDetailsModal.aria-labelto the voting modal.GroupInfomodal.Configuration