Trino Gateway documentation
|
Trino Gateway includes a routing rules engine.
By default, Trino Gateway reads the X-Trino-Routing-Group request header to
route requests. If this header is not specified, requests are sent to default
routing group (adhoc).
The routing rules engine feature enables you to write custom logic to route requests based on the request info such as any of the request headers. Routing rules are separated from Trino Gateway application code to a configuration file, allowing for dynamic rule changes.
To express and fire routing rules, we use the easy-rules engine. These rules should be stored in a YAML file. Rules consist of a name, description, condition, and list of actions. If the condition of a particular rule evaluates to true, its actions are fired.
---
name: "airflow"
description: "if query from airflow, route to etl group"
condition: 'request.getHeader("X-Trino-Source") == "airflow"'
actions:
- 'result.put("routingGroup", "etl")'
---
name: "airflow special"
description: "if query from airflow with special label, route to etl-special group"
condition: 'request.getHeader("X-Trino-Source") == "airflow" && request.getHeader("X-Trino-Client-Tags") contains "label=special"'
actions:
- 'result.put("routingGroup", "etl-special")'In the condition, you can access the methods of a
HttpServletRequest
object called request. There should be at least one action of the form
result.put(\"routingGroup\", \"foo\") which says that if a request satisfies
the condition, it should be routed to foo.
The condition and actions are written in MVEL,
an expression language with Java-like syntax. In most cases, users can write
their conditions/actions in Java syntax and expect it to work. There are some
MVEL-specific operators that could be useful though. For example, instead of
doing a null-check before accessing the String.contains method like this:
condition: 'request.getHeader("X-Trino-Client-Tags") != null && request.getHeader("X-Trino-Client-Tags").contains("label=foo")'You can use the contains operator
condition: 'request.getHeader("X-Trino-Client-Tags") contains "label=foo"'If no rules match, then request is routed to adhoc.
All rules whose conditions are satisfied will fire. For example, in the
"airflow" and "airflow special" example rules given above, a query with source
airflow and label special will satisfy both rules. The routingGroup is set
to etl and then to etl-special because of the order in which the rules of
defined. If we swap the order of the rules, then we would possibly get etl
instead, which is undesirable.
One could solve this by writing the rules such that they're atomic (any query will match exactly one rule). For example we can change the first rule to
---
name: "airflow"
description: "if query from airflow, route to etl group"
condition: 'request.getHeader("X-Trino-Source") == "airflow" && request.getHeader("X-Trino-Client-Tags") == null'
actions:
- 'result.put("routingGroup", "etl")'
---This could be hard to maintain as we add more rules. To have better control over the execution of rules, we could use rule priorities and composite rules. Overall, with priorities, composite rules, and the constructs that MVEL support, you should likely be able to express your routing logic.
We can assign an integer value priority to a rule. The lower this integer is,
the earlier it will fire. If the priority is not specified, the priority is
defaulted to INT_MAX. We can add priorities to our airflow and airflow special
rule like so:
---
name: "airflow"
description: "if query from airflow, route to etl group"
priority: 0
condition: 'request.getHeader("X-Trino-Source") == "airflow"'
actions:
- 'result.put("routingGroup", "etl")'
---
name: "airflow special"
description: "if query from airflow with special label, route to etl-special group"
priority: 1
condition: 'request.getHeader("X-Trino-Source") == "airflow" && request.getHeader("X-Trino-Client-Tags") contains "label=special"'
actions:
- 'result.put("routingGroup", "etl-special")'Note that both rules will still fire. The difference is that we've guaranteed
that the first rule (priority 0) is fired before the second rule (priority 1).
Thus routingGroup is set to etl and then to etl-special, so the
routingGroup will always be etl-special in the end.
Above, the more specific rules have less priority since we want them to be the
last to set routingGroup. This is a little counterintuitive. To further
control the execution of rules, for example to have only one rule fire, we can
use composite rules.
First, please refer to easy-rule composite rules docs: https://github.com/j-easy/easy-rules/wiki/defining-rules#composite-rules
Above, we saw how to control the order of rule execution using priorities. In
addition to this, we could have only the first rule matched to be fired (the
highest priority one) and the rest ignored. We can use ActivationRuleGroup to
achieve this.
---
name: "airflow rule group"
description: "routing rules for query from airflow"
compositeRuleType: "ActivationRuleGroup"
composingRules:
- name: "airflow special"
description: "if query from airflow with special label, route to etl-special group"
priority: 0
condition: 'request.getHeader("X-Trino-Source") == "airflow" && request.getHeader("X-Trino-Client-Tags") contains "label=special"'
actions:
- 'result.put("routingGroup", "etl-special")'
- name: "airflow"
description: "if query from airflow, route to etl group"
priority: 1
condition: 'request.getHeader("X-Trino-Source") == "airflow"'
actions:
- 'result.put("routingGroup", "etl")'Note that the priorities have switched. The more specific rule has a higher priority, since we want it to be fired first. A query coming from airflow with special label is matched to the "airflow special" rule first, since it's higher priority, and the second rule is ignored. A query coming from airflow with no labels does not match the first rule, and is then tested and matched to the second rule.
We can also use ConditionalRuleGroup and ActivationRuleGroup to implement an
if/else workflow. The following logic in pseudocode:
if source == "airflow":
if clientTags["label"] == "foo":
return "etl-foo"
else if clientTags["label"] = "bar":
return "etl-bar"
else
return "etl"
Can be implemented with these rules:
name: "airflow rule group"
description: "routing rules for query from airflow"
compositeRuleType: "ConditionalRuleGroup"
composingRules:
- name: "main condition"
description: "source is airflow"
priority: 0 # rule with the highest priority acts as main condition
condition: 'request.getHeader("X-Trino-Source") == "airflow"'
actions:
- ""
- name: "airflow subrules"
compositeRuleType: "ActivationRuleGroup" # use ActivationRuleGroup to simulate if/else
composingRules:
- name: "label foo"
description: "label client tag is foo"
priority: 0
condition: 'request.getHeader("X-Trino-Client-Tags") contains "label=foo"'
actions:
- 'result.put("routingGroup", "etl-foo")'
- name: "label bar"
description: "label client tag is bar"
priority: 0
condition: 'request.getHeader("X-Trino-Client-Tags") contains "label=bar"'
actions:
- 'result.put("routingGroup", "etl-bar")'
- name: "airflow default"
description: "airflow queries default to etl"
condition: "true"
actions:
- 'result.put("routingGroup", "etl")'Above, we saw how we can use ConditionalRuleGroup and ActivationRuleGroup to
implement and if/else workflow. We could also take advantage of the fact that
MVEL supports if statements and other flow control (loops, etc). The following
logic in pseudocode:
if source == "airflow":
if clientTags["label"] == "foo":
return "etl-foo"
else if clientTags["label"] = "bar":
return "etl-bar"
else
return "etl"
Can be implemented with these rules:
---
name: "airflow rules"
description: "if query from airflow"
condition: "request.getHeader(\"X-Trino-Source\") == \"airflow\""
actions:
- "if (request.getHeader(\"X-Trino-Client-Tags\") contains \"label=foo\") {
result.put(\"routingGroup\", \"etl-foo\")
}
else if (request.getHeader(\"X-Trino-Client-Tags\") contains \"label=bar\") {
result.put(\"routingGroup\", \"etl-bar\")
}
else {
result.put(\"routingGroup\", \"etl\")
}"To enable routing rules engine, find the following lines in
gateway-ha-config.yml. Set rulesEngineEnabled to True and rulesConfigPath
to the path to your rules config file.
routingRules:
rulesEngineEnabled: true
rulesConfigPath: "src/test/resources/rules/routing_rules.yml" # replace with path to your rules config file
If there is error opening routing rules configuration file, then request is routed
using routing group header X-Trino-Routing-Group as default.