-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: issue detail refactor #6768
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new TypeScript component along with its associated type for rendering additional widgets related to work items in the issue detail area. The new component is exported through the module’s index to facilitate easier imports and is integrated with the existing collapsible widget component. Additionally, a new sorting function is added to the issue store helpers, and a redundant prop has been removed from the sidebar component. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Collapsibles as IssueDetailWidgetCollapsibles
participant Widgets as WorkItemAdditionalWidgets
User->>Collapsibles: Load issue details
Collapsibles->>Widgets: Render Additional Widgets<br/>(workspaceSlug, projectId, workItemId, disabled)
Widgets-->>Collapsibles: Return rendered widget
sequenceDiagram
participant Caller as Client Code
participant IssueStore as BaseIssueStore
participant IssuesUtil as BaseIssueUtils (getIssueIds)
Caller->>IssueStore: Call workItemSortWithOrderByExtended(array, key)
IssueStore->>IssuesUtil: Invoke getIssueIds(array)
IssuesUtil-->>IssueStore: Return sorted IDs
IssueStore-->>Caller: Return sorted work items
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
web/ce/store/issue/helpers/base-issue-store.ts (1)
4-4
: Remove unused parameter or implement its functionalityThe function
workItemSortWithOrderByExtended
has an unusedkey
parameter that doesn't affect the function's behavior. Either remove this parameter or implement its intended functionality.- export const workItemSortWithOrderByExtended = (array: TIssue[], key?: string) => getIssueIds(array); + export const workItemSortWithOrderByExtended = (array: TIssue[]) => getIssueIds(array);Additionally, since this function is a simple wrapper around
getIssueIds
, consider either adding more functionality or documenting why this abstraction is necessary.web/ce/components/issues/issue-detail-widgets/additional-widgets.tsx (1)
10-10
: Add documentation to explain component purposeThe component currently renders an empty fragment, which is fine for initial refactoring. Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the component's purpose and any plans for future implementation.
+ /** + * A component for rendering additional widgets related to work items in the issue detail area. + * Currently a placeholder for future implementation. + */ export const WorkItemAdditionalWidgets: FC<TWorkItemAdditionalWidgets> = (props) => <></>;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
web/ce/components/issues/issue-detail-widgets/additional-widgets.tsx
(1 hunks)web/ce/components/issues/issue-detail-widgets/index.ts
(1 hunks)web/ce/store/issue/helpers/base-issue-store.ts
(1 hunks)web/core/components/issues/issue-detail-widgets/issue-detail-widget-collapsibles.tsx
(2 hunks)web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/sidebar.tsx
(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- web/core/components/issues/issue-detail/sidebar.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (1)
web/core/components/issues/issue-detail-widgets/issue-detail-widget-collapsibles.tsx (1)
web/ce/components/issues/issue-detail-widgets/additional-widgets.tsx (1) (1)
WorkItemAdditionalWidgets
(10:10)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
web/ce/components/issues/issue-detail-widgets/index.ts (1)
1-1
: Good use of barrel file patternUsing a barrel file pattern to re-export the components from additional-widgets module promotes cleaner imports throughout the application. This approach aligns with common React/TypeScript project organization best practices.
web/core/components/issues/issue-detail-widgets/issue-detail-widget-collapsibles.tsx (2)
14-14
: LGTM - Import added correctlyThe import for the new
WorkItemAdditionalWidgets
component is correctly added.
72-78
: LGTM - Component integration looks goodThe
WorkItemAdditionalWidgets
component is properly integrated at the end of the other collapsible widgets. The naming pattern change fromissueId
toworkItemId
suggests a possible shift in terminology or abstraction, which is consistent with good refactoring practices.web/ce/components/issues/issue-detail-widgets/additional-widgets.tsx (1)
3-8
: Type definition looks goodThe type definition follows TypeScript best practices with clear property names and types.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
packages/constants/src/index.ts
(1 hunks)packages/constants/src/swr-keys.ts
(1 hunks)packages/utils/src/common.ts
(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/constants/src/swr-keys.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/constants/src/index.ts (1)
32-32
: Good addition - follows consistent pattern!The new export for "swr-keys" follows the same pattern as the existing exports in this file, maintaining consistency in the codebase.
packages/utils/src/common.ts (1)
3-3
: Good addition of import for SWR keys.The import statement for
SWR_KEYS
is correctly placed at the top of the file along with other imports.
packages/utils/src/common.ts
Outdated
/** | ||
* Generates a unique key for SWR cache | ||
* @param workspaceSlug - The slug of the workspace | ||
* @param label - The label for the cache key | ||
* @param params - The parameters for the cache key | ||
* @returns The unique key in array format | ||
*/ | ||
export const getSwrKey = (workspaceSlug: string, label: SWR_KEYS, params: string[] = []) => [ | ||
label, | ||
workspaceSlug, | ||
...params, | ||
]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Well-documented utility function, but consider enum values.
The getSwrKey
function is well-documented with JSDoc comments and has a clear purpose. However, according to the summary, the SWR_KEYS
enum is currently empty. This could lead to inconsistent key usage if developers create their own string literals instead of using predefined enum values.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the SWR_KEYS enum has any values defined
echo "Checking content of SWR_KEYS enum:"
fd -e ts -e tsx "swr-keys.ts" --exec cat {} \;
Length of output: 152
Please update the SWR_KEYS enum values.
The getSwrKey
utility function is well-documented and clear. However, the verification confirms that the SWR_KEYS
enum remains empty (in swr-keys.ts
), which risks inconsistent cache key usage if developers start using arbitrary string literals. I suggest either:
- Defining preset values: Populate the enum with the intended cache keys to ensure consistency.
- Documenting intentional emptiness: If the enum is intentionally left empty for future expansion, add a clear comment explaining this decision.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
packages/constants/src/swr-keys.ts
(1 hunks)packages/utils/src/common.ts
(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (1)
packages/utils/src/common.ts (1)
packages/constants/src/swr-keys.ts (1)
TSWRKey
(7-7)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/constants/src/swr-keys.ts (1)
1-7
: Empty enum limits type safety benefitsThe structure established here (enum + const object + type alias) is a good TypeScript pattern for extensible constants with type safety. However, the
SWR_KEYS_CORE
enum is currently empty, which means:
- The
getSwrKey
function incommon.ts
cannot be effectively used yet- Developers might resort to using arbitrary string literals for cache keys
- You're missing the opportunity to standardize cache key naming
This issue was previously flagged in an earlier review. Please either:
- Populate the enum with the intended cache keys to ensure consistency
- If intentionally left empty for future expansion, add a comment explaining this decision
|
||
/** | ||
* Generates a unique key for SWR cache | ||
* @param workspaceSlug - The slug of the workspace | ||
* @param label - The label for the cache key | ||
* @param params - The parameters for the cache key | ||
* @returns The unique key in array format | ||
*/ | ||
export const getSwrKey = (workspaceSlug: string, label: TSWRKey, params: string[] = []) => [ | ||
label, | ||
workspaceSlug, | ||
...params, | ||
]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Well-documented utility function for consistent SWR key generation
The getSwrKey
function is well-designed with comprehensive JSDoc comments that clearly explain its purpose and parameters. The function provides a structured approach to generating SWR cache keys, which will help maintain consistency throughout the application.
However, the function depends on the TSWRKey
type which is currently based on an empty SWR_KEYS_CORE
enum (as seen in the second file). This significantly limits the function's utility in its current state.
While the structure is good, you should populate the SWR_KEYS_CORE
enum with actual values to make this function immediately useful. This would also prevent developers from using inconsistent string literals for cache keys.
Discarding swr keys changes for now. |
Description
Type of Change
Screenshots and Media (if applicable)
Test Scenarios
References
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor
Documentation