Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ci] skip aarch64 linux job #6517

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 3, 2024
Merged

[ci] skip aarch64 linux job #6517

merged 3 commits into from
Jul 3, 2024

Conversation

jameslamb
Copy link
Collaborator

@jameslamb jameslamb commented Jul 3, 2024

As described in #6509, we're having some issues in this project's aarch64 linux job.

Namely, different variants on this:

E ImportError: /root/miniforge/envs/test-env/lib/python3.12/site-packages/sklearn/utils/../../../../libgomp.so.1: cannot allocate memory in static TLS block

This proposes skipping that CI job temporarily, to unblock CI in the repo: #6509 (comment)

Copy link
Collaborator

@jmoralez jmoralez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will also make the CI faster haha

@jameslamb
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Just so you know I'm not trying to sneak in one more commit... I saw the R 3.6 jobs failing because they run in a container image with a too-old-for-GitHub-Actions GLIBC.

Pushed a commit with this workaround: actions/checkout#1590 (comment).

We could remove that whenever we remove R 3.6 support here.

@jameslamb
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This will also make the CI faster haha

yeah look at that! end-to-end run of all jobs in around 38 minutes 🔥

I'll merge this and work on merging the other already-approved PRs. Let's leave #6509 open until we've restored this Linux aarch64 job.

@jameslamb jameslamb merged commit 3a98ea1 into master Jul 3, 2024
41 checks passed
@jameslamb jameslamb deleted the skip-aarch64-job branch July 3, 2024 21:08
@jameslamb jameslamb removed the blocking label Jul 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants