Add release notes for 8.0.0 #397
Conversation
| * `ome-common` was upgraded to 6.0.24 | ||
| * `cdm-core` was upgraded to 5.6.0 | ||
|
|
||
| .. [1] This functionality was implemented through collaboration between Glencoe Software and `NCI Imaging Data Commons <https://datacommons.cancer.gov/repository/imaging-data-commons/>`_, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Really like the format. Only wonder is whether the use of numbers as the reference scales well. Last thing we want to do is reindex all of these everytime we add a new footnote.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'd imagine we could just use [2] for the next one and continue to increment as needed, expecting a very low volume? I'm not sure something very descriptive (like dicom-8.0.0) is very nice to read, but open to a middle ground if you have an idea.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I guess I liked the format enough that I was considering whether old entries like 7.1.0 should be updated accordingly. But neither this nor the discussion on the numbering scheme needs to hold the release either way.
We can discuss during an upcoming formats meeting how to handle this moving forward
Co-authored-by: Sébastien Besson <[email protected]>
| - define objective metadata for lens ID 18112 | ||
|
|
||
| * SDT | ||
| - fix reading of files acquired with SPCM 9.90 (thanks to Chen Qian) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
i assume Chen Qian will be added to the list of contributors on www.o.org
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, that is done in ome/www.openmicroscopy.org#757
Preparation for tomorrow's release of 8.0.0.