Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: Update tagged openassessment test #34782

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 14, 2024
Merged

test: Update tagged openassessment test #34782

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
115 changes: 5 additions & 110 deletions openedx/core/lib/xblock_serializer/test_api.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -68,112 +68,6 @@
"""


EXPECTED_OPENASSESSMENT_OLX = """
<openassessment
submission_start="2001-01-01T00:00"
submission_due="2029-01-01T00:00"
text_response="required"
text_response_editor="text"
allow_multiple_files="True"
allow_latex="False"
prompts_type="text"
teams_enabled="False"
selected_teamset_id=""
show_rubric_during_response="False"
url_name="Tagged_OpenAssessment_Block"
>
<title>Open Response Assessment</title>
<assessments>
<assessment name="student-training">
<example>
<answer>
<part>Replace this text with your own sample response for this assignment. Then, under Response Score to the right, select an option for each criterion. Learners practice performing peer assessments by assessing this response and comparing the options that they select in the rubric with the options that you specified.</part>
</answer>
<select criterion="Ideas" option="Fair"/>
<select criterion="Content" option="Good"/>
</example>
<example>
<answer>
<part>Replace this text with another sample response, and then specify the options that you would select for this response.</part>
</answer>
<select criterion="Ideas" option="Poor"/>
<select criterion="Content" option="Good"/>
</example>
</assessment>
<assessment name="peer-assessment" must_grade="5" must_be_graded_by="3" enable_flexible_grading="False" start="2001-01-01T00:00" due="2029-01-01T00:00"/>
<assessment name="self-assessment" start="2001-01-01T00:00" due="2029-01-01T00:00"/>
<assessment name="staff-assessment" start="2001-01-01T00:00" due="2029-01-01T00:00" required="False"/>
</assessments>
<prompts>
<prompt>
<description>
Censorship in the Libraries

'All of us can think of a book that we hope none of our children or any other children have taken off the shelf. But if I have the right to remove that book from the shelf -- that work I abhor -- then you also have exactly the same right and so does everyone else. And then we have no books left on the shelf for any of us.' --Katherine Paterson, Author

Write a persuasive essay to a newspaper reflecting your views on censorship in libraries. Do you believe that certain materials, such as books, music, movies, magazines, etc., should be removed from the shelves if they are found offensive? Support your position with convincing arguments from your own experience, observations, and/or reading.

Read for conciseness, clarity of thought, and form.
</description>
</prompt>
</prompts>
<rubric>
<criterion feedback="optional">
<name>Ideas</name>
<label>Ideas</label>
<prompt>Determine if there is a unifying theme or main idea.</prompt>
<option points="0">
<name>Poor</name>
<label>Poor</label>
<explanation>Difficult for the reader to discern the main idea. Too brief or too repetitive to establish or maintain a focus.</explanation>
</option>
<option points="3">
<name>Fair</name>
<label>Fair</label>
<explanation>Presents a unifying theme or main idea, but may include minor tangents. Stays somewhat focused on topic and task.</explanation>
</option>
<option points="5">
<name>Good</name>
<label>Good</label>
<explanation>Presents a unifying theme or main idea without going off on tangents. Stays completely focused on topic and task.</explanation>
</option>
</criterion>
<criterion>
<name>Content</name>
<label>Content</label>
<prompt>Assess the content of the submission</prompt>
<option points="0">
<name>Poor</name>
<label>Poor</label>
<explanation>Includes little information with few or no details or unrelated details. Unsuccessful in attempts to explore any facets of the topic.</explanation>
</option>
<option points="1">
<name>Fair</name>
<label>Fair</label>
<explanation>Includes little information and few or no details. Explores only one or two facets of the topic.</explanation>
</option>
<option points="3">
<name>Good</name>
<label>Good</label>
<explanation>Includes sufficient information and supporting details. (Details may not be fully developed; ideas may be listed.) Explores some facets of the topic.</explanation>
</option>
<option points="5">
<name>Excellent</name>
<label>Excellent</label>
<explanation>Includes in-depth information and exceptional supporting details that are fully developed. Explores all facets of the topic.</explanation>
</option>
</criterion>
<feedbackprompt>
(Optional) What aspects of this response stood out to you? What did it do well? How could it be improved?
</feedbackprompt>
<feedback_default_text>
I think that this response...
</feedback_default_text>
</rubric>
</openassessment>
"""


@skip_unless_cms
class XBlockSerializationTestCase(SharedModuleStoreTestCase):
"""
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -701,10 +595,11 @@ def test_tagged_openassessment_block(self):

# Check that the tags data is serialized and omitted from the OLX
serialized = api.serialize_xblock_to_olx(openassessment_block)
self.assertXmlEqual(
serialized.olx_str,
EXPECTED_OPENASSESSMENT_OLX
)

self.assertNotIn("normal tag", serialized.olx_str)
self.assertNotIn("<special \"'-=,. |= chars > tag", serialized.olx_str)
self.assertNotIn("anotherTag", serialized.olx_str)

self.assertEqual(serialized.tags, {
str(openassessment_block.location): {
self.taxonomy1.id: ["normal tag", "<special \"'-=,. |= chars > tag", "anotherTag"],
Expand Down
Loading