Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DRAFT] Performance impact of jemalloc profiling #1505

Closed

Conversation

andyleiserson
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

jemalloc is used by default on linux. The feature enables it on
non-linux platforms.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.26%. Comparing base (69f0a5d) to head (11010e2).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1505      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   93.02%   93.26%   +0.24%     
==========================================
  Files         237      238       +1     
  Lines       43535    43688     +153     
==========================================
+ Hits        40498    40746     +248     
+ Misses       3037     2942      -95     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@andyleiserson
Copy link
Collaborator Author

andyleiserson commented Dec 17, 2024

The draft run with heap profiling on (prof:true,prof_active:true) took 2:05, about a 10% slowdown. I'm going to do another with prof:true,prof_active:false.

@andyleiserson
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The run with prof:true,prof_active:false took 1:52, no change from the baseline without these settings (or without the profiling feature entirely).

@andyleiserson andyleiserson changed the title [DRAFT] [IGNORE] Enable jemalloc profiling [DRAFT] Performance impact of jemalloc profiling Dec 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant