Add Hypothesis trove classifier for pytest-trio

[Zac-HD]

Since PR #44, pytest-trio has had special handling that allows @hypothesis.given(...) for Trio tests even though they are async functions. This PR is a trivial update to add the new Framework :: Hypothesis trove classifier (:tada:), as discussed in HypothesisWorks/hypothesis#1663, so that users can more easily tell from the metadata.

[Zac-HD]

Uh. Looks like trio has updated with some new deprecation warnings, and pytest-trio isn't pinning the version it tests against...

[njsmith]

Oh cool, congrats on the new classifier! We should definitely add that.

Re: the pinning... yeah. I filed #69 to avoid these issues in the future. I'm a bit swamped this week so not sure if I'll get to it any time soon.

It looks like the actual test failures are all due to trio-asyncio using the deprecated Queue functionality rather than anything in pytest-trio. I guess the most correct fix, and possibly also the simplest, would be to fix trio-asyncio and make a release?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #68 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #68   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.34%   99.34%           
=======================================
  Files          19       19           
  Lines         461      461           
  Branches       43       43           
=======================================
  Hits          458      458           
  Misses          2        2           
  Partials        1        1

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 46f2ba7...e7fd67a. Read the comment docs.

[Zac-HD]

@njsmith @touilleMan a release to get this up on PyPI would be awesome 😁