Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix for issues 10 & 22: remove wrong and unneeded 'requires' entry from setup args #27

Conversation

gavanderhoorn
Copy link
Member

This should make the docjob(s) run to completion again and make catkin_make install work again.

I opted to remove the entire requires entry as it is unneeded:

  • catkin pkgs should be installed using catkin, not setup.py
  • dependency is already expressed in the pkg manifest

Upon acceptance this should probably be cherry-picked into groovy-devel and hydro-devel.

Perhaps a quick re-release of hydro-devel is then in order, as the buildfarm will be disabled soon.

…ros-industrial-attic#10 and fix ros-industrial-attic#22.

The 'python-' prefix of the 'pymodbus' entry was not correct: only the debian
package has that prefix. It caused the setup phase to fail, which made the
robotiq docjob error out. It was also the reason for 'catkin_make install' not
completing.

instead of correcting the entry, the entire 'requires' key was removed from
the setup args. Catkin packages should not be installed using the 'setup.py'
file, and the dependency on 'python-modbus' is already expressed in the pkg
manifest.
@gavanderhoorn
Copy link
Member Author

Btw: the manifests and build scripts of all pkgs could use some work. See also #26.

@gavanderhoorn
Copy link
Member Author

Ping?

The Hydro buildfarm is nearing EOL, would be nice if the docs could be generated at least once?

nicolaslauzier added a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2015
Fix for issues 10 & 22: remove wrong and unneeded 'requires' entry from setup args
@nicolaslauzier nicolaslauzier merged commit dd22677 into ros-industrial-attic:indigo-devel May 19, 2015
@gavanderhoorn gavanderhoorn deleted the issue10_doc_job branch May 20, 2015 14:08
@gavanderhoorn
Copy link
Member Author

I'd recommend this be cherry picked into the groovy-devel and hydro-devel branches as well.

Or would you prefer I open PRs against those branches?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants