-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RS17, Proposition 9.10. #149
Conversation
@fizruk can you remind me (and @robin-carlier) how the user can do this fix:
|
@robin-carlier thanks for the contribution. Perhaps you could add a sentence or two in markdown before each of your main lemmas explaining the idea of the proof? But once that and minor formatting issues are fixed, we can merge. |
Installing |
Looks good. |
I noticed Proposition 9.10 was stated in the exposition but not formalized.
The proof is split between
has-initial-tot-is-representable-family-is-segal
andhas-initial-tot-is-representable-family-is-segal
. I also added a helper lemma that states that equivalences map initial objects to initial objects (as well as its dual for final objects).This closes #21.