Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

deprecate interactive API #1125

Merged

Conversation

vrancurel
Copy link
Contributor

@vrancurel vrancurel commented Nov 6, 2024

  • Move the interactive_api examples under openfl-tutorials/deprecated
  • Mark interactive_api as deprecated in the doc
  • Remove interactive_api from CI/CD

Copy link
Collaborator

@teoparvanov teoparvanov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM at first glance. Here are a couple of things I noticed:

openfl-tutorials/Federated_Pytorch_MNIST_Tutorial.ipynb Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/ubuntu.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
@vrancurel vrancurel force-pushed the deprecate_interactive_api branch from 544e360 to ef01dad Compare November 7, 2024 21:48
docs/about/releases.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@kta-intel
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks @vrancurel, this is definitely a much needed PR! However, I'd just like some clarity on the plan

@vrancurel vrancurel force-pushed the deprecate_interactive_api branch 2 times, most recently from 8b06d64 to 76e224a Compare November 12, 2024 21:29
@tanwarsh tanwarsh mentioned this pull request Nov 13, 2024
- Point interactive_api examples to openfl-contrib (where they have been moved)
- Mark interactive_api as deprecated in the doc
- Remove interactive_api from CI/CD

Signed-off-by: Rancurel, Vianney <[email protected]>
@vrancurel vrancurel force-pushed the deprecate_interactive_api branch from 76e224a to 547d496 Compare November 14, 2024 01:31
@vrancurel
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @tanwarsh please merge as needed.

@teoparvanov
Copy link
Collaborator

teoparvanov commented Nov 14, 2024

Hi @vrancurel , do you intend to refactor kvasir-interactive to Workflow API in this PR, or in a separate one?
If done separately, then this PR could be merged as-is. So, please let me know what your plan is.

@vrancurel
Copy link
Contributor Author

In a separate one, please merge @teoparvanov

@teoparvanov teoparvanov merged commit 63177f4 into securefederatedai:develop Nov 14, 2024
28 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants