chore: refactor examples and types, and add new swap_router example
#119
Conversation
Refactored various examples and structs for improved clarity and usability, including updates to `NFTPermitData` and related modules. Added a new `swap_router` example to demonstrate token swaps. Updated dependencies and unified dev dependencies, while incrementing package version to 3.0.0.
WalkthroughBazinga! This pull request represents a significant update to the Uniswap V3 SDK, incrementing the package version from 2.9.1 to 3.0.0. The changes primarily involve dependency management in Cargo.toml, updating Alloy library imports, adding a new swap router example, and making minor refinements to code structure in various files. The modifications suggest a strategic evolution of the SDK's capabilities and dependency ecosystem. Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant SwapRouter
participant TokenA
participant TokenB
participant LiquidityPool
User->>SwapRouter: Initiate Swap
SwapRouter->>LiquidityPool: Quote Output Amount
LiquidityPool-->>SwapRouter: Return Quote
SwapRouter->>TokenA: Transfer Input
SwapRouter->>TokenB: Receive Output
SwapRouter-->>User: Confirm Swap
Possibly Related PRs
Poem
Sheldon Cooper mic drop 🎤 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
Cargo.toml(3 hunks)README.md(1 hunks)examples/from_pool_key_with_tick_data_provider.rs(2 hunks)examples/swap_router.rs(1 hunks)src/nonfungible_position_manager.rs(3 hunks)src/self_permit.rs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (20)
examples/from_pool_key_with_tick_data_provider.rs (3)
16-16: Bazinga! You replaced U160 with U256. This is logically correct and ensures enough range for typical 256-bit operations.
45-46: You assigned the quotient to a new variable before printing. It's more readable, but do confirm no overflows.
61-61: Fine refinement to compare your local_amount_out with the official quoter. This ensures correctness.
examples/swap_router.rs (7)
1-9: The doc comments are nicely structured, Dr. Cooper approves. Keep it up for consistent usage guidance.
30-66: Functional logic is straightforward: sets up environment, defines WBTC, Ether, fetches on-chain data, calculates quotes. Looks good.
67-76: You’re spinning up an Anvil fork. Impressive! This approach is perfect for local testing. Maintain this pattern for consistent dev flows.
93-107: Your transaction flow to register and await the swap is downright pragmatic. Checking final balance is wise.
108-108: The final assertion ensures the WBTC balance matches the quoter's output. Perfectly rational.
10-29: Imports align with your usage of providers and sol definitions. However, watch for potential version mismatches across "alloy" modules.
✅ Verification successful
Fascinating! After meticulous analysis, I can confirm version consistency across alloy modules
Based on my superior examination of the Cargo.toml files, all alloy-related dependencies are perfectly aligned at version 0.8, demonstrating a harmonious synchronization that would make even Leonard jealous. The imports are not only correct but optimally configured.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for duplicates in cargo toml
fd -e toml | xargs cat | rg 'alloy'
Length of output: 399
77-92: Constructing the trade then generating swap call parameters is correct. Always ensure your route includes correct addresses for tokens.
src/self_permit.rs (1)
29-29: Your example references the new signers from alloy::signers::{local}. It’s consistent with the updated dependency approach. Kudos.
src/nonfungible_position_manager.rs (5)
69-69: Introducing a type alias NFTPermitValues = IERC721Permit::Permit is an eloquent improvement in naming clarity.
70-70: This line finalizes the new type alias usage, which fosters code brevity. Bravo.
440-440: The updated example referencing alloy’s local signers is neatly integrated. This should be consistent across the codebase.
445-445: Declaring NFTPermitValues within the doc comment example is a stroke of thoroughness.
471-471: The get_permit_data constant function is correct and fosters clarity for NFT permit usage.
Cargo.toml (3)
68-70: Ah, a new example! Let's ensure proper documentation exists.
While the example configuration is correct, we should verify its documentation.
✅ Verification successful
Bazinga! The documentation is impeccable and meets my exacting standards.
The example file contains comprehensive documentation including:
- Clear description of functionality
- Prerequisites with RPC URL requirement
- Feature flag requirement explicitly stated
- Technical note about mainnet block usage
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for corresponding example file and its documentation
fd "swap_router.rs" examples/ -x cat {}
Length of output: 3386
42-42: Fascinating dependency consolidation! Let's verify the migration.
The removal of individual signer crates in favor of features from the main alloy crate shows elegant optimization.
✅ Verification successful
Bazinga! The dependency consolidation is perfectly logical.
After applying my superior intellect to analyze the codebase, I can confirm that the migration from individual signer crates to the consolidated alloy features is correct. The codebase properly uses the new alloy::signers path in the examples, and all signer-related functionality is accessed through the main alloy crate's features.
src/self_permit.rsandsrc/nonfungible_position_manager.rsdemonstrate correct usage:use alloy::signers::{local::PrivateKeySigner, SignerSync}
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any remaining references to removed dependencies
rg "alloy[-_]signer|alloy[-_]signer[-_]local" --type rust
Length of output: 59
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the codebase more thoroughly with my superior intellect
# First, check for any direct imports or uses of alloy
rg "use alloy" --type rust -A 3
# Then, let's specifically look for signer-related functionality
rg "::signer|Signer" --type rust -A 2
# And for good measure, let's see what other alloy features are used
ast-grep --pattern 'use alloy::$_::$_'
Length of output: 20660
3-3: Bazinga! A major version increment requires proper justification.
According to the sacred principles of semantic versioning, incrementing to version 3.0.0 implies breaking changes.
✅ Verification successful
The previous command didn't work as expected, likely because we need a different approach to gather evidence about breaking changes. I'm requesting the git history, checking for changelog files, and examining the current changes to make a more informed analysis.
The previous attempts were unsuccessful. As any theoretical physicist would tell you, we need to establish our baseline parameters first by examining the repository structure and documentation. This will help us understand the context of this version increment.
Great Scott! This version bump is perfectly justified!
After examining the repository with the precision of a quantum physicist, I can confirm this is a complete rewrite using alloy-rs types and includes significant optimizations of the math libraries. The README clearly documents these substantial architectural changes, which absolutely warrant a major version increment according to semantic versioning principles.
- Migration to alloy-rs types
- Reimplementation of math libraries with optimizations
- Addition of new extensions and features
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for potentially breaking changes in commit history
git log --oneline $(git describe --tags --abbrev=0)..HEAD | grep -iE "break|deprecat|remov|chang|updat"
Length of output: 0
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the git history in a more precise manner
git log --oneline -n 50
# Let's also check for any CHANGELOG files
fd -t f -i changelog
# And examine the diff between the current branch and the main/master branch
git diff origin/main...HEAD
Length of output: 251
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the repository structure and recent changes
git branch -a
git status
# Let's look for any documentation about breaking changes
rg -i "breaking.?chang" -g '!{node_modules,target}/*'
fd -t f -e md | xargs cat
Length of output: 5443
README.md (1)
52-52: As expected, perfect version synchronization!
The README.md correctly reflects the version update from Cargo.toml. This level of consistency brings joy to my perfectly organized mind.
Refactored various examples and structs for improved clarity and usability, including updates to
NFTPermitDataand related modules. Added a newswap_routerexample to demonstrate token swaps. Updated dependencies and unified dev dependencies, while incrementing package version to 3.0.0.Summary by CodeRabbit