-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Corrected the A+B+C.zip file naming convention #8
base: 2.0
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@@ -31,8 +31,10 @@ Whenever you sync with the server, a file with the format `{date in GMT}={X}+{Y} | |||
{date in GMT}={B}+{Y}.zip | |||
|
|||
**Resulting transaction file** | |||
Because `date in GMT of the oldest` < `date in GMT of the youngest`, | |||
{date in GMT}={X}+{Y}+{Z}.zip | |||
Resulting transaction file Based on alphabetical order, say if `X < Y`, then: {date in GMT}={X}+{Y}+{Z}.zip |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Were you able to confirm through experiment that is indeed the case?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes,
date in GMT of the oldest
< date in GMT of the youngest
OR
date in GMT of the oldest
> date in GMT of the youngest
has no effect on resulting file name
Because `date in GMT of the oldest` < `date in GMT of the youngest`, | ||
{date in GMT}={X}+{Y}+{Z}.zip | ||
Resulting transaction file Based on alphabetical order, say if `X < Y`, then: {date in GMT}={X}+{Y}+{Z}.zip | ||
Hence, in all P+Q+R.zip type filenames, alphabetically `P < Q` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems incomplete.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+Hence, in all P+Q+R.zip type filenames, alphabetically
P < Q
This is an observation that can be made on any OmniFocus.ofocus file: https://www.google.co.in/search?biw=1670&bih=1320&q=inurl:OmniFocus.ofocus/&oq=inurl:OmniFocus.ofocus/&gs_l=serp.3...7590.7590.0.8081.1.1.0.0.0.0.139.139.0j1.1.0....0...1c.1.64.serp..0.0.0.UGJvzosBWME&gws_rd=cr&ei=1Z71V8WkLMPtvASAhJeQBQ
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've only found one example going through those links, but I'll assume it's a better assumption than the initial one.
However, what I was saying is that this sentence is incomplete (furthermore, it appears to repeat what was said just above).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removed the duplicate now
but, why incomplete?
Resulting transaction file Based on alphabetical order, say if `X < Y`, then: {date in GMT}={X}+{Y}+{Z}.zip | ||
Hence, in all P+Q+R.zip type filenames, alphabetically `P < Q` | ||
|
||
Any transaction file generated next will henceforth be named {date in GMT}={Z}+{C}.zip, where Z is the randomId generated for the resulting transaction file. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a duplicate of the line just below.
Fixes #7