-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: allow 256 pods per node. #119
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ac80f04
chore: allow 256 pods per node.
ricolin 30c5866
fix molecule requirements
ricolin 3936f31
rockylinux8 doesn't work with ansible-core >= 2.17.0
ricolin 981c0ab
Retry on k8s task
ricolin 0fedf90
Merge branch 'main' into allow-256-max-pods
ricolin File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,8 +1,10 @@ | ||
ansible-core | ||
ansible-core < 2.17.0 | ||
docker-image-py | ||
jmespath | ||
molecule | ||
molecule-plugins[docker] | ||
pytest < 8.0.0 | ||
pytest-forked | ||
pytest-xdist | ||
PyYAML > 6.0.0 | ||
requests < 2.31.0 |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -47,3 +47,5 @@ | |
template: | ||
spec: | ||
nodeSelector: "{{ kubernetes_coredns_node_selector }}" | ||
retries: 10 | ||
delay: 1 |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ricolin is it because 2.17 breaks something?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah there is a syntax error in 2.17 when ansible try to talk with rockylinux8 environment
I leave the detail here: #119 (comment)
So IMO, we either constrain this version or drop rockylinux8 from CI
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In RHEL world this can/should be fixed by installing python3x using dnf and switched from default system Python using 'update-alternatives'. Distro's Python version will stay 3.6 til EOL.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So the concern I have is we either support default rockylinux8 or ask to switch the python in rockylinux8 to fit this collection needs
I think we can use update-alternatives in real cases but not that handy in CI. Just make a patch to reinstall python to 3.9 so we don't need to touch ansible-core requirement.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
unfortunately can not change python version from molecule prepare stage as it failed on Gethering fact for prepare
let me revert 7677c98 for now