Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rewrite _many_ tests to use vtctldclient invocations, mostly non-output related stuff #15270

Merged

Conversation

ajm188
Copy link
Contributor

@ajm188 ajm188 commented Feb 16, 2024

Description

I arbitrarily picked this as a stopping point for this batch. I'll do another round after this!

I'm focusing on the non-output-focused stuff for now to put off dealing with minor changes in output that tests may depend on, but those are coming up.

Related Issue(s)

#15273

Checklist

  • "Backport to:" labels have been added if this change should be back-ported to release branches
  • If this change is to be back-ported to previous releases, a justification is included in the PR description
  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on CI?
  • Documentation was added or is not required

Deployment Notes

Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Feb 16, 2024

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Feb 16, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v20.0.0 milestone Feb 16, 2024
Andrew Mason added 2 commits February 16, 2024 15:25
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 16, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (54c6dfc) 67.44% compared to head (7c538ab) 67.45%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #15270   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   67.44%   67.45%           
=======================================
  Files        1561     1561           
  Lines      193193   193193           
=======================================
+ Hits       130304   130314   +10     
+ Misses      62889    62879   -10     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Andrew Mason added 5 commits February 16, 2024 17:14
Signed-off-by: Andrew Mason <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Mason <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Mason <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Mason <[email protected]>
@ajm188 ajm188 added Type: Internal Cleanup Type: Testing Component: Build/CI and removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required labels Feb 17, 2024
ugh
Signed-off-by: Andrew Mason <[email protected]>
@ajm188 ajm188 marked this pull request as ready for review February 17, 2024 00:37
Copy link
Contributor

@shlomi-noach shlomi-noach left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice!

Signed-off-by: Andrew Mason <[email protected]>
@ajm188 ajm188 requested a review from dbussink February 19, 2024 13:15
@deepthi deepthi merged commit 241fb44 into vitessio:main Feb 20, 2024
102 checks passed
@deepthi deepthi deleted the andrew/endtoend-tests-with-vtctldclient branch February 20, 2024 05:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants