Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename site parameter to monitoring_site #42

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Rename site parameter to monitoring_site #42

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

mmerfort
Copy link
Member

Pull Request (PR) description

Since “site” is a protected keyword, it may not be used as a parameter name. I renamed it to “monitoring_site”.

This Pull Request (PR) fixes the following issues

Fixes #41

Since “site” is a protected keyword, it may not be used as a parameter
name.
@tuxmea
Copy link
Member

tuxmea commented Mar 17, 2021

Looks good to me. Needs major version due to incompatibility

Copy link
Member

@alexjfisher alexjfisher left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a bug in Puppet 7 fixed in 7.5.0. See https://tickets.puppetlabs.com/browse/PUP-10929

@mmerfort
Copy link
Member Author

This is a bug in Puppet 7 fixed in 7.5.0. See https://tickets.puppetlabs.com/browse/PUP-10929

Should we still rename it or just wait until 7.5 is out?

@mmerfort
Copy link
Member Author

I have added another commit to fix the failing tests, which are broken because of an unrelated issue.

Since the content of encryption.cfg is sensitive, it directly. Instead,
the content needs to be exctracted from the catalogue.
@mmerfort
Copy link
Member Author

mmerfort commented Jul 8, 2021

Sorry, but I'm not interested in supporting Check_MK anymore.

@mmerfort mmerfort closed this Jul 8, 2021
@mmerfort mmerfort deleted the bug_keyword_parameter branch July 8, 2021 08:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Future CentOS 8 support?
4 participants