Support for multiprocessed fastq output #65
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
remiolsen
force-pushed
the
parallel_fastq_out
branch
from
5b0ef26 to
e119808
Compare
|
Also updated to ruff 0.3.0 for ruff-precommit, since the old one was fighting with GH action's version of ruff. |
|
I changed my mind. I might as well try to parallise lenient mode while I'm at it. |
alneberg
approved these changes
Mar 21, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
closes #3
Parallelise per fastq file output (and not fastq file entries chunks). I will not explain further.
Needs some testing. Setting this as draft PR