Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[14.0][IMP] queue_job: identity_key enhancements #581

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 22, 2023

Conversation

simahawk
Copy link
Contributor

Replaces #544

@richard-willdooit sorry, I really need to move this fwd on both 14 and 16.
I kept your commit here and I just dropped the odoo version from the msg.
I also added a specific commit to drop the STARTED state to make prominent the motivation provided by @guewen on https://github.com/OCA/queue/pull/546/files#r1232041609 (whole comment in the commit description).

I can fwd port to v16 later.

@simahawk simahawk changed the title [IMP] queue_job: identity_key enhancements [14.0][IMP] queue_job: identity_key enhancements Nov 21, 2023
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @guewen,
some modules you are maintaining are being modified, check this out!

@simahawk
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've created #582 to follow up w/ the option to make states configurable per job.

@guewen
Copy link
Member

guewen commented Nov 21, 2023

Thanks! (To @richard-willdooit too)

@simahawk
Copy link
Contributor Author

Build fixed on #583

Richard deMeester and others added 2 commits November 21, 2023 18:13
1. In production, a job which is waiting dependencies or which
has started, but not completed, should not be repeated if
the identity_key matches.

2. In tests, the mock queue handler is now enhanced to allow
better mimicking of the identity_key blocks from production.

3. In tests, the mock queue handler now clears the enqueued jobs
after performing them, to better reproduce what a production
environment would do.
Good explanation from Guewen:

Depending on the use case, we should or should not include.
As part of my current work, I use Sidekiq daily.
They have a similar feature, but you can set a per-job parameter unique_until with options:
start (that would mean up to ENQUEUED here) or success (that would be up to STARTED here).

Think about this use case: a job refreshes a cache. Data have changed, we create a pending job. Data change again, no new job because the job is still pending.
Job starts. Data change while the job is running. In this very case, we'd like to enqueue a new job otherwise the cache will be outdated.

I reckon that both cases are valid, but I fear adding this state in the domain may, silently and in subtle ways, existing behaviors.
@simahawk
Copy link
Contributor Author

/ocabot merge minor

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR looks fantastic, let's merge it!
Prepared branch 14.0-ocabot-merge-pr-581-by-simahawk-bump-minor, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit a7396ef into OCA:14.0 Nov 22, 2023
7 checks passed
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at 8240043. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants