-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[FAU-434] Correctly assign campo keys to multiple terms within degree program #42
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks! Could you please check the Psalm errors?
Psalm errors are occurring because the related PR (RRZE-Webteam/FAU-Studium-Common#17) in the common package hasn't been merged into the dev branch yet. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Psalm errors are occurring because the related PR (RRZE-Webteam/FAU-Studium-Common#17) in the common package hasn't been merged into the dev branch yet.
I also thought of that but didn't realize that was indeed the case. Sorry for the noise!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thank you
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
Feature
What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)
https://inpsyde.atlassian.net/browse/FAU-434
Currently we have only one campo key per taxonomy in the degree program data, even if degree program has a few terms with different campo keys.
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
The new logic presented in related PR, includes campo keys from all related terms to degree program data. And in this PR, we update the current implementation to handle an array of campo keys instead of a single string, as was previously done.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR?)
No
Other information:
RRZE-Webteam/FAU-Studium-Common#17