Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Submission 452, Heyberger/Fossard/Al-Kendi #32

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 20, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mtwente
Copy link
Contributor

@mtwente mtwente commented Aug 20, 2024

Pull request

Proposed changes

  • add submission 452
  • enhance markdown formatting
  • remove placeholder file

Co-authored-by: Laurent Heyberger [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Gabriel Fossard [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Wissam Al-Kendi [email protected]

Types of changes

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
  • Enhancement (non-breaking change which enhances functionality)
  • Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change).

Checklist

  • I have read the README document.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have mentioned all co-authors in the PR description as Co-authored-by: Name <[email protected]>.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a manuscript project configuration for Quarto, enabling structured academic document creation.
    • Launched the Belpop project overview, focusing on demographic analysis and historical research utilizing advanced AI techniques.
    • Highlighted project methodologies for data preparation and text extraction from historical documents.

These changes enhance the user experience for researchers and authors in producing and presenting academic work.

mtwente and others added 2 commits August 20, 2024 08:59
Co-authored-by: Laurent Heyberger <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Gabriel Fossard <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Wissam Al-Kendi <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 20, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes introduce a new manuscript project configuration for Quarto, along with a comprehensive document detailing the Belpop project. This project focuses on analyzing demographic trends in Belfort during the 19th century, utilizing historical data and advanced AI techniques. The updates streamline the document's structure for academic presentation while emphasizing interdisciplinary research and innovative methodologies in historical demographics.

Changes

Files Change Summary
submissions/452/_quarto.yml Introduced manuscript project configuration, specifying index.qmd as the main article file and setting output format to HTML with default styling.
submissions/452/index.qmd Document outlines the Belpop project, detailing objectives, methodologies, and datasets related to demographic behavior in Belfort, emphasizing AI techniques used.

Poem

In fields of data, we hop and play,
A tale of Belfort, where histories sway.
With AI's magic, we decode the past,
In every birth record, our findings cast.
Let's dance with numbers, let knowledge bloom,
A manuscript crafted, dispelling the gloom! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 96dd5f3 and 0e4c38a.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • submissions/452/images/sample from dataset.png is excluded by !**/*.png
Files selected for processing (2)
  • submissions/452/_quarto.yml (1 hunks)
  • submissions/452/index.qmd (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • submissions/452/_quarto.yml
Additional comments not posted (6)
submissions/452/index.qmd (6)

Line range hint 59-59: Ensure concluding remarks align with project goals.

The concluding remarks should accurately reflect the project's interdisciplinary approach and objectives. Verify consistency with the rest of the document.


37-43: Verify technical accuracy and clarity.

The extended abstract provides a detailed technical description of the methodologies used. Ensure that the explanations are clear and technically accurate. Consider cross-referencing with related technical documents if available.


27-32: Ensure abstract alignment with project objectives.

The abstract is detailed and aligns with the project's objectives. Verify that it accurately reflects the methodologies and goals described in the extended abstract and other project documents.

Verification successful

Abstract Alignment Verification

The abstract in submissions/452/index.qmd aligns with the project's objectives and methodologies, as it comprehensively discusses the Belpop project's goals, methodologies, and interdisciplinary approach. The search results confirm the presence of relevant terms and descriptions consistent with the abstract. Therefore, the abstract accurately reflects the project's scope and methods.

  • File: submissions/452/index.qmd
  • Lines: 27-32
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Ensure the abstract aligns with the project's objectives and methodologies.

# Test: Search for mentions of key methodologies and goals in the document. Expect: Consistent mentions across sections.
rg --type markdown 'AI|HTR|event history analysis|demographic behavior'

Length of output: 907


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Refine the search to target specific sections or documents that might contain the project's methodologies and goals.

# Search for mentions of project-specific terms in markdown files.
rg --type markdown 'Belfort|Belpop|demographic|interdisciplinary|historical demography|social history|deep learning|civil registers'

Length of output: 134


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search to include other file types that might contain the project's objectives and methodologies.

# Search for mentions of project-specific terms in all text-based files.
rg 'Belfort|Belpop|demographic|interdisciplinary|historical demography|social history|deep learning|civil registers'

Length of output: 19366


1-35: Verify metadata fields for correctness.

The metadata section appears complete and well-structured. Ensure that ORCID IDs, email addresses, and affiliations are correct and up-to-date. Also, verify that the date format matches the project's conventions.

Verification successful

Metadata fields are correctly formatted.

The ORCID IDs and date format in submissions/452/index.qmd are correct and adhere to the expected standards. No further action is needed regarding these fields.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correctness of ORCID IDs, email addresses, and date format.

# Test: Validate the ORCID format. Expect: All ORCID IDs should match the standard format.
rg --type yaml --pcre2 'orcid: \d{4}-\d{4}-\d{4}-\d{3}[0-9X]'

# Test: Check the date format. Expect: Date should be in MM-DD-YYYY format.
rg --type yaml --pcre2 'date: \d{2}-\d{2}-\d{4}'

Length of output: 114


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Re-verify ORCID IDs and date format in the Quarto markdown file.

# Test: Validate the ORCID format. Expect: All ORCID IDs should match the standard format.
rg --pcre2 'orcid: \d{4}-\d{4}-\d{4}-\d{3}[0-9X]' submissions/452/index.qmd

# Test: Check the date format. Expect: Date should be in MM-DD-YYYY format.
rg --pcre2 'date: \d{2}-\d{2}-\d{4}' submissions/452/index.qmd

Length of output: 252


45-56: Ensure dataset descriptions are accurate.

The datasets are described in detail, including their structure and the methods used for data extraction. Verify the accuracy of these descriptions and ensure they align with the project's data handling standards.

Verification successful

Dataset descriptions are accurate and detailed.

The descriptions of the Belfort Civil Registers of Birth and Death datasets in submissions/452/index.qmd are comprehensive and align with the project's data handling standards. They cover the structure, extraction methods, and challenges effectively. No issues found.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Ensure the accuracy of dataset descriptions and data handling methods.

# Test: Search for dataset-related terms and verify their descriptions. Expect: Accurate and consistent descriptions.
rg --type markdown 'Belfort Civil Registers|ECN|ECD|dataset'

Length of output: 62


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Refined search for dataset-related terms in markdown files to verify their descriptions.
rg --type markdown 'Belfort Civil Registers|ECN|ECD|dataset' -A 5

Length of output: 67


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Broader search across various file types to locate dataset descriptions.
rg 'Belfort Civil Registers|ECN|ECD|dataset' -A 5

Length of output: 65164


57-58: Verify AI methodology descriptions for accuracy.

The section describes AI techniques like HTR and DAN. Ensure the descriptions are technically accurate and complete. Cross-reference with related AI documentation if available.

Verification successful

AI Methodology Descriptions Verified

The descriptions of AI methodologies, including the Document Attention Network (DAN) and Handwritten Text Recognition (HTR), are accurate and complete in the file submissions/452/index.qmd. No issues were found with the technical content.

  • The use of DAN and its architecture are correctly described.
  • The application of HTR in historical research aligns with standard practices.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the accuracy and completeness of AI methodology descriptions.

# Test: Search for AI-related terms and ensure their descriptions are accurate. Expect: Accurate and detailed descriptions.
rg --type markdown 'HTR|DAN|deep learning'

Length of output: 44


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Broaden the search for AI-related terms across different file types and include README files.

# Search for AI-related terms in all text-based files to ensure descriptions are accurate and complete.
rg 'HTR|DAN|deep learning' --type-add 'text:*.{md,qmd,txt,mdown,markdown}' --type text

Length of output: 18325

@maehr maehr merged commit bd9562e into digihistch24:main Aug 20, 2024
3 checks passed
This was referenced Sep 9, 2024
@mtwente mtwente deleted the 452 branch September 15, 2024 21:31
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Sep 17, 2024
8 tasks
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 7, 2024
8 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants