submission 687

[wissen-ist-acht]

Pull request

Proposed changes

• add submission 687

authored by: Ina Serif, [email protected]

Types of changes

• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
• Enhancement (non-breaking change which enhances functionality)
• Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change).

Checklist

• I have read the README document.
• My change requires a change to the documentation.
• I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• I have mentioned all co-authors in the PR description as Co-authored-by: Name <[email protected]>.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Introduced a manuscript project configuration for rendering articles using Quarto.
  • Added a comprehensive academic submission on teaching digital history methods, including structured metadata and sections on course design.
  • Included a detailed bibliography in BibTeX format for references related to digital humanities and history.

These enhancements improve the accessibility and organization of scholarly content within the application.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a new manuscript project configuration for rendering an article using Quarto. It includes the addition of an _quarto.yml file that defines the project type, specifies the main article, and sets the output format to HTML. Additionally, a new academic submission file, index.qmd, is added, detailing a pedagogical approach to teaching digital history methods. A bibliography file, references.bib, is also included, providing essential citations relevant to the field.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
submissions/687/_quarto.yml	Added manuscript configuration with project type, main article, and HTML output format.
submissions/687/index.qmd	Added a comprehensive academic submission with metadata, sections on course design, and a bibliography.
submissions/687/references.bib	Introduced a BibTeX formatted bibliography containing various references related to digital humanities.

Possibly related PRs

• Submission 450, Eliane Schmid #5: Similar manuscript project configuration for Quarto.
• Submission 462, Hitz/Prada/Vonwiller #7: Introduces a _quarto.yml file for a manuscript project.
• Submission 428, Gabi Wüthrich #12: Configured _quarto.yml for a manuscript project.
• Submission 474, Moritz Feichtinger #15: Defines a manuscript project in _quarto.yml.
• Submission 460, Monika Reppo #16: Specifies a manuscript project in _quarto.yml.
• Submission 464, Victoria G. D. Landau #17: Defines a manuscript project configuration.
• Submission 468, Wigger/Moser #20: Configured _quarto.yml for a manuscript project.
• Submission 447, Hart et al. #22: Introduces a manuscript project in _quarto.yml.
• Submission 427, Politycki/Sonder #29: Establishes a manuscript project configuration.
• Submission 452, Heyberger/Fossard/Al-Kendi #32: Defines a manuscript project in _quarto.yml.
• Submission 469, Iván Lorenci de Francisco #34: Specifies a manuscript project in _quarto.yml.
• Submission 473, Greiner-Petter/Waltenspül #36: Includes a manuscript project definition in _quarto.yml.
• Submission 444, Paloposki/Pikkanen #37: Configured _quarto.yml for a manuscript project.
• Submission 482, Baudry/Chachereau #47: Specifies a manuscript project in _quarto.yml.
• Submission 466, Burkart et al. #53: Defines a manuscript project configuration.
• Submission 472, Kahlert/Kurzawe #54: Establishes a manuscript project in _quarto.yml.
• Submission 486, Chadha/Rashiti/Sibille #60: Introduces a manuscript project for Quarto.
• Submission 486, Additional Author #61: Adds an author entry related to manuscript configuration.
• Submission 443, Ehrmann et al. #62: Establishes a manuscript project in _quarto.yml.

Suggested labels

submission

Poem

🐇 In the meadow where knowledge grows,
A manuscript blooms, as the rabbit knows.
With Quarto's magic, HTML shines bright,
Teaching history's tales, a wondrous sight.
References gathered, a scholarly feast,
Hop along, dear friends, let learning increase! 🌼📚

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8a5085c and d936eb1.

Files selected for processing (3)

• submissions/687/_quarto.yml (1 hunks)
• submissions/687/index.qmd (1 hunks)
• submissions/687/references.bib (1 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)

• submissions/687/_quarto.yml
• submissions/687/references.bib

Additional comments not posted (5)

submissions/687/index.qmd (5)

1-18: Metadata appears correctly formatted.

The YAML front matter is well-structured and includes all necessary information for the submission. However, consider privacy implications of including direct email addresses in publicly accessible documents.

---

20-21: Introduction section is well-crafted.

The introduction effectively sets the stage for the discussion on digital methods in historical research.

---

23-31: Motivation and Course Design section is effectively detailed.

This section provides a clear rationale for the course design and effectively uses references to support the statements.

---

44-47: Conclusion and Outlook section is comprehensive.

The conclusion effectively summarizes the course outcomes and discusses the need for curriculum changes to better support digital methods in historical research.

---

51-51: Verify the inclusion of references.

The references section is indicated but appears empty. Ensure that all necessary citations are included in the references.bib file or directly in this section if intended.