Submission 466, Burkart et al.

[mtwente]

Pull request

Proposed changes

• add poster 466 (see Add Poster Session to Book of Abstracts #48)

Co-authored-by: Lucas Burkart [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Tobias Hodel [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Hitz [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Aline Vonwiller [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Ismail Prada Ziegler [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Jonas Aeby [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Katrin Fuchs [email protected]

Types of changes

• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
• Enhancement (non-breaking change which enhances functionality)
• Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change).

Checklist

• I have read the README document.
• My change requires a change to the documentation.
• I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• I have mentioned all co-authors in the PR description as Co-authored-by: Name <[email protected]>.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Introduced a manuscript project configuration, enabling better organization and rendering of research documents.
  • Added a comprehensive overview of a research project titled "Economies of Space: Opening up Historical Finding Aids," showcasing the use of machine learning in historical data analysis.
• Documentation
  • Enhanced documentation detailing the project's significance and methodologies, highlighting key accomplishments and insights into historical data processing.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

A new manuscript configuration file _quarto.yml has been added, designating index.qmd as the primary article file and setting the output format to HTML. Additionally, a new document index.qmd provides an overview of a research project titled "Economies of Space: Opening up Historical Finding Aids," detailing the application of machine learning techniques to historical data processing and its implications for analyzing historical archives.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
submissions/poster/466/_quarto.yml, submissions/poster/466/index.qmd	Introduced _quarto.yml for manuscript configuration and added index.qmd detailing a research project on machine learning applications in historical data.

Poem

In the meadow, hop and play,
New changes bright as day!
Manuscripts now take their flight,
With knowledge shining bright.
A tale of spaces, old and grand,
With machine learning, hand in hand! 🐇✨

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7127cbe and 51f19cb.

Files selected for processing (2)

• submissions/poster/466/_quarto.yml (1 hunks)
• submissions/poster/466/index.qmd (1 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• submissions/poster/466/_quarto.yml

Additional comments not posted (3)

submissions/poster/466/index.qmd (3)

1-41: Well-structured metadata.

The metadata for the submission is correctly formatted and includes all necessary details, ensuring clear identification and categorization of the submission.

---

43-50: Content Review: Clear and informative.

The content provides a detailed and engaging overview of the research project. It effectively communicates the achievements and implications of applying machine learning techniques to historical data processing.

---

43-50: Verify alignment with PR objectives.

Ensure that the content accurately reflects the objectives outlined in the PR summary, particularly in terms of the project's scope and the specific achievements mentioned.