-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Submission 486, Chadha/Rashiti/Sibille #60
Conversation
Co-authored-by: rashitig <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Tarun Chadha <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Christiane Sibille <[email protected]>
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe submission introduces a comprehensive study on Named Entity Linking (NEL) in historical research, addressing challenges and methodologies for applying machine learning to historical texts. It outlines a modular workflow utilizing contextual embeddings and various knowledge bases to enhance entity linking accuracy. A new bibliography file has been added, documenting relevant academic references in the field, formatted in BibTeX. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant NEL_Workflow
participant Knowledge_Base
participant Historical_Texts
User->>NEL_Workflow: Initiate NEL Process
NEL_Workflow->>Historical_Texts: Retrieve historical texts
NEL_Workflow->>Knowledge_Base: Query for entity information
Knowledge_Base-->>NEL_Workflow: Return entity data
NEL_Workflow-->>User: Provide linked entities
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
submissions/486/index.qmd (1)
42-50
: LGTM!The methods section provides a comprehensive overview of the project's approach and key aspects. The modular pipeline and the focus on interpretation of metrics and the role of GLAM institutions are well-explained.
To improve accessibility, consider updating the alt text of the embedded image to provide a more descriptive explanation of the end-to-end Named Entity Linking pipeline. For example:
-![Pipeline of end-to-end Named Entity Linking.](https://github.com/rashitig/abstract-template/blob/main/images/graph.png?raw=true) +![A flowchart illustrating the pipeline of end-to-end Named Entity Linking, which includes steps such as text preprocessing, named entity recognition, entity disambiguation, and entity linking to knowledge bases.](https://github.com/rashitig/abstract-template/blob/main/images/graph.png?raw=true)
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- submissions/486/index.qmd (1 hunks)
- submissions/486/references.bib (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- submissions/486/references.bib
Additional comments not posted (3)
submissions/486/index.qmd (3)
32-41
: LGTM!The introduction section is well-written and provides a clear overview of the research topic. It effectively highlights the challenges and the importance of using contextual embeddings for improved accuracy in NER and NEL tasks.
51-52
: LGTM!The conclusion section effectively summarizes the key challenges and the importance of the research. It emphasizes the role of GLAM institutions in providing enriched data layers to users and the need for addressing technical, documentation, and methodological challenges.
1-30
: LGTM!The YAML metadata is complete and well-structured. The abstract provides a good overview of the research.
Please ensure that the
references.bib
file is consistent with the citations used in the main content. You can use the following script to verify the consistency:
Pull request
Proposed changes
Co-authored-by: rashitig [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Tarun Chadha [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Christiane Sibille [email protected]
Types of changes
Checklist
Co-authored-by: Name <[email protected]>
.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation