Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Submission 486, Chadha/Rashiti/Sibille #60

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 4, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mtwente
Copy link
Contributor

@mtwente mtwente commented Sep 2, 2024

Pull request

Proposed changes

  • add submission 486
  • fix markdown citation syntax

Co-authored-by: rashitig [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Tarun Chadha [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Christiane Sibille [email protected]

Types of changes

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
  • Enhancement (non-breaking change which enhances functionality)
  • Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change).

Checklist

  • I have read the README document.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have mentioned all co-authors in the PR description as Co-authored-by: Name <[email protected]>.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a comprehensive submission on Named Entity Linking (NEL) in historical research, detailing challenges and methodologies.
    • Added a bibliography file containing academic references related to named entity recognition and historical document analysis.
  • Documentation

    • Enhanced documentation on the operational capabilities of NEL models for large-scale historical text analysis.

mtwente and others added 2 commits September 2, 2024 16:32
Co-authored-by: rashitig <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Tarun Chadha <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Christiane Sibille <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 2, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The submission introduces a comprehensive study on Named Entity Linking (NEL) in historical research, addressing challenges and methodologies for applying machine learning to historical texts. It outlines a modular workflow utilizing contextual embeddings and various knowledge bases to enhance entity linking accuracy. A new bibliography file has been added, documenting relevant academic references in the field, formatted in BibTeX.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
submissions/486/index.qmd Introduced a comprehensive submission on NEL in historical research, detailing methodologies, challenges, and a structured workflow.
submissions/486/references.bib Added a new bibliography file containing various academic references related to named entity recognition and historical document analysis.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant NEL_Workflow
    participant Knowledge_Base
    participant Historical_Texts

    User->>NEL_Workflow: Initiate NEL Process
    NEL_Workflow->>Historical_Texts: Retrieve historical texts
    NEL_Workflow->>Knowledge_Base: Query for entity information
    Knowledge_Base-->>NEL_Workflow: Return entity data
    NEL_Workflow-->>User: Provide linked entities
Loading

🐰 In fields of history, we hop with glee,
New links and methods, as bright as can be!
With knowledge bases, we jump and play,
Named entities shine in a brand new way!
So let’s celebrate this wondrous change,
In the world of texts, we’ll freely range! 🌼✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
submissions/486/index.qmd (1)

42-50: LGTM!

The methods section provides a comprehensive overview of the project's approach and key aspects. The modular pipeline and the focus on interpretation of metrics and the role of GLAM institutions are well-explained.

To improve accessibility, consider updating the alt text of the embedded image to provide a more descriptive explanation of the end-to-end Named Entity Linking pipeline. For example:

-![Pipeline of end-to-end Named Entity Linking.](https://github.com/rashitig/abstract-template/blob/main/images/graph.png?raw=true)
+![A flowchart illustrating the pipeline of end-to-end Named Entity Linking, which includes steps such as text preprocessing, named entity recognition, entity disambiguation, and entity linking to knowledge bases.](https://github.com/rashitig/abstract-template/blob/main/images/graph.png?raw=true)
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 031c530 and b6a14ff.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • submissions/486/index.qmd (1 hunks)
  • submissions/486/references.bib (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • submissions/486/references.bib
Additional comments not posted (3)
submissions/486/index.qmd (3)

32-41: LGTM!

The introduction section is well-written and provides a clear overview of the research topic. It effectively highlights the challenges and the importance of using contextual embeddings for improved accuracy in NER and NEL tasks.


51-52: LGTM!

The conclusion section effectively summarizes the key challenges and the importance of the research. It emphasizes the role of GLAM institutions in providing enriched data layers to users and the need for addressing technical, documentation, and methodological challenges.


1-30: LGTM!

The YAML metadata is complete and well-structured. The abstract provides a good overview of the research.

Please ensure that the references.bib file is consistent with the citations used in the main content. You can use the following script to verify the consistency:

submissions/486/index.qmd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@mtwente mtwente merged commit 3c01a07 into digihistch24:main Sep 4, 2024
3 checks passed
This was referenced Sep 9, 2024
@mtwente mtwente deleted the 486 branch September 15, 2024 21:30
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Sep 17, 2024
8 tasks
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 6, 2024
8 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants