Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes safe_action logic #396

Closed

Conversation

alexander-soare
Copy link
Contributor

@alexander-soare alexander-soare commented Aug 30, 2024

Addresses #394

I checked that I can run the robot with and without the action cap.

@alexander-soare
Copy link
Contributor Author

dupe

Copy link
Collaborator

@Cadene Cadene left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

We would indeed need CI for this ^^ Will do soon

@aliberts aliberts mentioned this pull request Aug 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants