Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge pull request #450 from una-auxme/449-Add-new-guidelines-for-the…
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
…-sprint-review-meeting

Add new guidelines for the sprint review meeting
  • Loading branch information
JulianTrommer authored Nov 6, 2024
2 parents a70e2fe + 36f1c5f commit 4bea66b
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 90 additions and 1 deletion.
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion doc/dev_talks/paf24/README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -9,7 +9,8 @@

- [Mermaid Gantt Chart](./mermaid_paf24.md)
- [Student Roles](./student_roles.md)
- [Joker Rules]
- [Joker Rules](./joker_rules_paf24.md)
- [Sprint Review Meeting Guidelines](./sprint_review_meeting_guidelines.md)

## Notes for Sprints

Expand Down
88 changes: 88 additions & 0 deletions doc/dev_talks/paf24/sprint_review_meeting_guidelines.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
# Sprint Review Meeting PAF24

**Summary**: This document outlines the process for our sprint review meetings.

- [1. Timeline and Submission Guidelines](#1-timeline-and-submission-guidelines)
- [1.1. Pre-Meeting Agenda](#11-pre-meeting-agenda)
- [1.2. Meeting Agenda](#12-meeting-agenda)
- [2. Key Updates](#2-key-updates)
- [3. Sprint Review Schedule](#3-sprint-review-schedule)
- [4. Rationale for These Changes](#4-rationale-for-these-changes)
- [5. Pre-Meeting Checklist](#5-pre-meeting-checklist)

## 1. Timeline and Submission Guidelines

- **Team Configuration**: Work in teams of any size.

### 1.1. Pre-Meeting Agenda

- **Summary Submission**: By **Monday at 11:30 AM** (before the meeting), submit a summary of your work on Digicampus.
- TODO A template will be provided.
- Upload your document to DigiCampus at [this link](https://digicampus.uni-augsburg.de/dispatch.php/course/files?cid=5b0c38206c78cc03880bc2e71997220f).
- Inform us of your group composition and presentation order for our note-taking.
- **12:00 - 13:30**: Sample Review
- Selected students will be reviewed individually, receiving an individual grade separate from the group grade.
- A review guideline will be provided in the future.
- **By 13:30**: Sample Review Feedback
- Feedback will be given based on the sample review, allowing you to address any points during your sprint presentation.

### 1.2. Meeting Agenda

- **14:00 - 15:45**: Sprint Presentations
- Presenting as a group is recommended for time efficiency.
- Not all members need to present; teams can decide on their approach.
- **15:45**: Grading Discussion and Sprint Planning Refinement
- **16:30**: Grade Announcement and Feedback
- **16:50**: Discussion of Your Plan for the Upcoming Sprint

## 2. Key Updates

- The general overview presentation is now removed or partially integrated into the Systems Engineers’ presentation.
- Grades are assigned based on the group presentation; however, individuals who undergo a sample review may receive a different grade.
- Presentation time is allocated at **5 minutes per student**:
- Example: A team of three has a total of 15 minutes and may allocate time as they see fit.
- A unified grade will be given unless individual assessment is warranted.
- Timeboxing will be strictly enforced: only content shared within the allotted time will be evaluated. Presentations will be stopped at the time limit.
- TODO The sprint review presentation guideline will be updated.

## 3. Sprint Review Schedule

```mermaid
gantt
title Schedule of the Sprint Review on Monday
dateFormat HH-mm
axisFormat %H:%M
tickInterval 15minute
section Before the Meeting
Text Submission and Group Info: milestone, at, 11-30, 0H
Sample Review: sr, 12-00, 13-00
Sample Review Feedback: fb1, 13-00, 30m
section During the Meeting
Meeting Start: milestone, beginn, 14-00, 0m
Questions: f, 14-00, 5m
Group Presentations: p, after f, 100m
Break: pu, after p, 10m
Grading Discussion and Sprint Planning: nsp, after pu, 35m
Feedback: fb2, after nsp, 20m
Sprint Planning Discussion: spd, after fb2, 25m
End of Meeting: milestone, ende, 17-15, 0m
```

## 4. Rationale for These Changes

- To enable individual assessment where feasible.
- To avoid excessive time requirements, as individual reviews would take approximately 15–20 minutes per student.
- To keep the meetings on schedule.
- To track overall project progress.
- Allow us to provide constructive feedback.
- Group presentations should allow for a deeper focus on content.

## 5. Pre-Meeting Checklist

- [ ] Submit your "Summary of Work" by 11:30 AM (individual).
- [ ] Provide group composition details.
- [ ] Identify team members.
- [ ] By 1:30 PM, check if you received individual feedback.
- [ ] Consider how to incorporate feedback into your presentation.

0 comments on commit 4bea66b

Please sign in to comment.