Add documentation for PAF24 meeting on 2024-10-28

doc/dev_talks/paf24/T03_2024-10-28.md

@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+# Meeting 03 on 2024-10-28
+
+**summary**: 2024-10-28 Time Boxing, Issues and PRs, Sprint Review Presentation, Group Size Decision, Sprint Planning Guidelines, Sprint Planning
+
+- [1. Time Boxing](#1-time-boxing)
+- [2. Issues and PRs](#2-issues-and-prs)
+- [3. Sprint Review Presentation](#3-sprint-review-presentation)
+- [4. Group Size Decision](#4-group-size-decision)
+  - [4.1. Pro Large Group](#41-pro-large-group)
+  - [4.2. Contra Large Group](#42-contra-large-group)
+  - [4.3. Discussion](#43-discussion)
+  - [4.4. Decision](#44-decision)
+- [5. Sprint Planning Guidelines](#5-sprint-planning-guidelines)
+- [6. Sprint Planning](#6-sprint-planning)
+
+## 1. Time Boxing
+
+```mermaid
+gantt
+title Time Boxing 2024-10-28
+dateFormat HH:mm
+axisFormat %H-%M
+tickInterval 10minute
+%% a comment
+%% docs https://mermaid.js.org/syntax/gantt.html
+
+Issues and PRs: i, 14:00, 30m
+Sprint Review Presentation: srp, after i, 20m
+Group Size Decision: gsd, after srp, 20m
+Sprint Planning Guidelines: spg, after gsd, 20m
+Sprint Planning: sp, after spg, 100m
+```
+
+## 2. Issues and PRs
+
+- How do you create issues for the discussed work packages?
+- How do you create branches for the issues?
+- How do you submit the corresponding PRs?
+- How do I review PRs?
+
+- [Project Management](../../development/project_management.md)
+- [Git Workflow](../../development/git_workflow.md)
+- [Review Guidelines](../../development/review_guidelines.md)
+
+## 3. Sprint Review Presentation
+
+- [Sprint Review Presentation](../../development/sprint_review_presentation.md)
+
+## 4. Group Size Decision
+
+< 19 Students
+
+- **Smaller Groups**: Members may have more direct control over tasks, but it might require more individual effort and responsibility.
+- **Larger Groups**: Allows for more specialization, but requires a higher level of coordination and clear communication strategies to prevent mismanagement.
+
+### 4.1. Pro Large Group
+
+- Addresses a challenging project more effectively
+- Simulates real-world team dynamics
+- Supports task distribution among more members
+- Allows deeper project insights through collaboration
+- Greater resilience to student dropouts
+
+### 4.2. Contra Large Group
+
+- Increased coordination efforts
+- Varied levels of participation may affect progress
+- Difficulties in fair individual grading
+- Potential for communication breakdowns
+- Less individual responsibility per task
+
+### 4.3. Discussion
+
+- Participants can voice concerns or suggestions prior to voting to ensure an informed decision.
+
+### 4.4. Decision
+
+- Should the decision be made by majority vote?
+
+## 5. Sprint Planning Guidelines
+
+- [Sprint Planning Guidelines](../../development/sprint_planning_guidelines.md)
+
+## 6. Sprint Planning
+
+...