-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update Project Management and PR #351
Conversation
Fixes Update Project Management and PR #350
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces substantial updates to the project management and review guideline documents. It emphasizes the use of issues and milestones over GitHub Projects, restructures sections for improved clarity, and removes references to deadlines for pull requests. The review guidelines are enhanced with new sections on merging and branch deletion, while existing content is reorganized for better navigation and readability. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
doc/development/project_management.md (3)
5-6
: Consider using consistent numbering style.The numbered sections in the TOC could be more consistent with typical Markdown style.
-- [1. Create bug or feature requests](#1-create-bug-or-feature-requests) -- [2. Create a Pull Request](#2-create-a-pull-request) +1. [Create bug or feature requests](#1-create-bug-or-feature-requests) +2. [Create a Pull Request](#2-create-a-pull-request)
14-14
: Fix grammar in the instruction.Add a comma for better readability.
-By clicking "New issue" in the overview you have different templates to create the issue. +By clicking "New issue" in the overview, you have different templates to create the issue.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~14-~14: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...ue.png) By clicking "New issue" in the overview you have different templates to create ...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
20-20
: Address the outdated image TODO comment.The comment indicates that the image needs to be updated to reflect the current UI.
Would you like me to help create a GitHub issue to track this task?
doc/development/review_guideline.md (2)
59-62
: Consider enhancing the CodeRabbit section with more details.While the section introduces CodeRabbit well, it could be more helpful with:
- Examples of common CodeRabbit suggestions and how to interpret them
- Guidelines on when to prioritize human review over automated suggestions
- Best practices for incorporating CodeRabbit feedback
Would you like me to help draft additional content for this section?
89-89
: Add missing commas for improved readability.Add commas in the following sentences:
-If you made substantial changes to your pull request and want to a fresh review from a reviewer, contact him directly. It is appropriate to ask the same reviewer from the initial pull request as he/she is most familiar with the pull request. +If you made substantial changes to your pull request and want to a fresh review from a reviewer, contact him directly. It is appropriate to ask the same reviewer from the initial pull request, as he/she is most familiar with the pull request. -If there are no uncertainties the reviewer merges the PR. +If there are no uncertainties, the reviewer merges the PR. -The deadline for submitting a pull request is **Friday 10:00 am** before the end of the sprint. +The deadline for submitting a pull request is **Friday 10:00 am**, before the end of the sprint.Also applies to: 104-104, 120-120
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~89-~89: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...the same reviewer from the initial pull request as he/she is most familiar with the pul...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- doc/development/project_management.md (1 hunks)
- doc/development/review_guideline.md (5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
doc/development/project_management.md
[uncategorized] ~14-~14: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...ue.png) By clicking "New issue" in the overview you have different templates to create ...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
doc/development/review_guideline.md
[uncategorized] ~89-~89: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...the same reviewer from the initial pull request as he/she is most familiar with the pul...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~104-~104: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...d asRequest Changes
. If there are no uncertainties the reviewer merges the PR. After a rev...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~120-~120: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...line for submitting a pull request is Friday 10:00 am before the end of the sprint...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
doc/development/project_management.md (1)
3-3
: LGTM! Clear and concise summary.The summary effectively communicates the project management approach using issues and milestones.
doc/development/review_guideline.md (1)
3-18
: Well-structured TOC with improved organization!The numbered sections and new additions for merging and branch deletion provide a complete overview of the PR lifecycle. The summary is concise and focused.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
doc/development/project_management.md (2)
20-20
: Address the TODO comment regarding outdated image.The comment indicates that the image needs to be updated to match the current UI.
Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track this image update task?
29-29
: Remove trailing space.There is a trailing space at the end of line 29.
-After merging, remember to delete the source branch to keep the repository clean. +After merging, remember to delete the source branch to keep the repository clean.🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
29-29: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
doc/development/review_guideline.md (3)
95-95
: Add missing comma for better readability.-If a new commit took place it is encouraged to comment the commit SHA +If a new commit took place, it is encouraged to comment the commit SHA🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~95-~95: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...request on GitHub. If a new commit took place it is encouraged to comment the commit ...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
104-109
: Fix formatting issues.
- Add blank lines around the checklist for better markdown formatting
- Add missing comma in the sentence for better readability
### 5.1. Pre-merge Checklist + Before merging, ensure: - [ ] All conversations are resolved - [ ] Required CI/CD checks are passing - [ ] No pending change requests - [ ] Code has been reviewed thoroughly - [ ] Documentation is up-to-date + -If there are no uncertainties the reviewer merges the PR. +If there are no uncertainties, the reviewer merges the PR.Also applies to: 114-114
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
105-105: null
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines(MD032, blanks-around-lists)
130-132
: Improve readability of deadline statements.-The deadline for submitting a pull request is **Friday 10:00 am** before the end of the sprint. +The deadline for submitting a pull request is **Friday 10:00 am**, before the end of the sprint. -The deadline for submitting a review for a pull request is **Monday 10:00 am** before the end of the sprint. +The deadline for submitting a review for a pull request is **Monday 10:00 am**, before the end of the sprint.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~130-~130: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...line for submitting a pull request is Friday 10:00 am before the end of the sprint...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~132-~132: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...itting a review for a pull request is Monday 10:00 am before the end of the sprint...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- doc/development/project_management.md (1 hunks)
- doc/development/review_guideline.md (5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint
doc/development/project_management.md
29-29: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
doc/development/review_guideline.md
105-105: null
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines(MD032, blanks-around-lists)
🪛 LanguageTool
doc/development/review_guideline.md
[uncategorized] ~95-~95: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...request on GitHub. If a new commit took place it is encouraged to comment the commit ...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~114-~114: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...asRequest Changes
. If there are no uncertainties the reviewer merges the PR. After a rev...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~130-~130: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...line for submitting a pull request is Friday 10:00 am before the end of the sprint...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~132-~132: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...itting a review for a pull request is Monday 10:00 am before the end of the sprint...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
doc/development/project_management.md (3)
3-6
: LGTM! Clear and well-structured introduction.The summary and table of contents are well-organized, with proper linking to GitHub resources and consistent section numbering.
8-14
: LGTM! Concise issue creation instructions.The section effectively guides users through the issue creation process with appropriate visual aids.
16-31
: LGTM! Well-structured PR process documentation.The pull request section provides clear instructions with a comprehensive merge checklist and proper reference to the review guidelines.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
29-29: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
doc/development/review_guideline.md (2)
3-19
: LGTM! Well-structured table of contents.The updated summary and numbered sections in the table of contents improve navigation and clarity.
100-127
: LGTM! Clear merging guidelines and responsibilities.The new sections provide clear guidance on:
- Pre-merge requirements
- Reviewer responsibilities
- Branch cleanup process
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~114-~114: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...asRequest Changes
. If there are no uncertainties the reviewer merges the PR. After a rev...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
🪛 Markdownlint
105-105: null
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines(MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Simulation results
|
This pull request updates the project management and review guideline documentation. It includes the following changes:
Updated instructions for creating bug or feature requests
Added information on creating a pull request
Added guidelines for reviewing pull requests
Added information on incorporating feedback and resolving conversations
Added guidelines for merging a pull request and deleting the branch
Updated deadlines for pull requests and reviews
Fixes #350
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation