Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated documentation and improved upon acting debugging. #479

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 11, 2024

Conversation

vinzenzm
Copy link
Collaborator

@vinzenzm vinzenzm commented Nov 9, 2024

Added a new acting_debug launch file which launches only the necessary components for debugging. Updated the documentation for how to use the debugging node. Fixed a visual bug in the debug node where the trajectory was visualized wrongly.

Description

Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change.

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

e.g. is old functionality not usable anymore

Most important changes

Which files functionalities are most important in this PR. On which part should the reviewer be focussed on?

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (might be obsolete with CI later on)
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes (might be obsolete with CI later on)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new launch file (acting_debug.launch) for easier startup of acting and debugging components.
    • Enhanced the Acting_Debug_Node for improved handling and visualization of agent positions.
  • Documentation

    • Updated acting_testing.md with clearer instructions for testing and tuning acting components, including new setup guides and operational details for the Acting_Debug_Node.

Added a new acting_debug launch file which launches only the necessary components for debugging.
Updated the documentation for how to use the debugging node.
Fixed a visual bug in the debug node  where the trajectory was visualized wrongly.
@vinzenzm vinzenzm linked an issue Nov 9, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 9, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a new launch file, acting_debug.launch, which facilitates the initiation of acting functionalities alongside a debug node in a robotics framework. It defines several parameters and incorporates nodes from both the acting and perception packages. Additionally, modifications are made to the Acting_Debug_Node class to enhance position tracking and visualization. The documentation for testing acting components is also updated to provide clearer instructions and details about the new launch file and testing procedures.

Changes

File Change Summary
code/acting/launch/acting_debug.launch New launch file added to initialize acting and debug nodes with parameters.
code/acting/src/acting/Acting_Debug_Node.py Added instance variables for position tracking; updated trajectory z-coordinate handling.
doc/acting/acting_testing.md Updated documentation for testing procedures, including details on acting_debug.launch.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

planning

Suggested reviewers

  • johannaschwarz

Poem

🐰 In the land of code where rabbits play,
A launch file hops in to light the way.
With nodes a-buzz and positions in sight,
Debugging our acting, oh what a delight!
So gather 'round, let the testing commence,
For every small change makes perfect sense! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
code/acting/launch/acting_debug.launch (2)

1-7: Enhance documentation for better clarity.

Consider improving the header comment and argument documentation:

  1. Add prerequisites and usage instructions
  2. Document the unit for control_loop_rate (seconds)
  3. Explain the significance of the "hero" role name
 <!--
-This launch file starts acting as well as the debug node.
+This launch file initializes the acting system with debugging capabilities.
+
+Prerequisites:
+  - Carla simulator running
+  - ROS core running
+
+Usage:
+  roslaunch acting acting_debug.launch [args]
 -->
 <launch>
     <arg name="role_name" default="hero" />
-    <arg name="control_loop_rate" default="0.05" /> 
+    <arg name="control_loop_rate" default="0.05" doc="Control loop period in seconds (20Hz)" /> 
     <arg name="show_rqt_plots_automatically" default="true" />

20-30: Consider making filter type configurable via launch arguments.

Currently, the filter type is hardcoded to "Kalman". For better flexibility, consider making it configurable:

 <launch>
+    <arg name="pos_filter_type" default="Kalman" />
+    <arg name="heading_filter_type" default="Kalman" />
     ...
     <node pkg="perception" type="position_heading_publisher_node.py" name="position_heading_publisher_node" output="screen">
         <param name="control_loop_rate" value="$(arg control_loop_rate)" />
         <param name="role_name" value="$(arg role_name)" />
-        <param name="pos_filter" value="Kalman" />
-        <param name="heading_filter" value="Kalman" />
+        <param name="pos_filter" value="$(arg pos_filter_type)" />
+        <param name="heading_filter" value="$(arg heading_filter_type)" />
     </node>
doc/acting/acting_testing.md (3)

13-14: Fix typo in documentation

There's a typo in the word "necesarry" which should be "necessary".

-There is a dedicated [acting_debug.launch](../../code/acting/launch/acting_debug.launch) file which starts the acting component **as well as the necesarry perception components** automatically.
+There is a dedicated [acting_debug.launch](../../code/acting/launch/acting_debug.launch) file which starts the acting component **as well as the necessary perception components** automatically.

21-24: Add missing comma and improve clarity

The sentence needs a comma after "As mentioned above", and it would be helpful to suggest backing up original configurations.

-As mentioned above this includes everything we need.
+As mentioned above, this includes everything we need.

Consider adding a note about backing up the original configuration files before making changes:

+- Before making changes, it's recommended to backup your original configuration files.
 - In [dev.launch](../../code/agent/launch/dev.launch) the [agent.launch](../../code/agent/launch/agent.launch) file is included.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~22-~22: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...om the acting package. As mentioned above this includes everything we need. - In ...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)


34-35: Consider expanding plot configuration documentation

The mention of plot configurations in rqt-window could benefit from more detailed information, such as:

  • Available plot types
  • Common configuration examples
  • Best practices for different debugging scenarios

Would you like assistance in expanding this section with more detailed documentation?

code/acting/src/acting/Acting_Debug_Node.py (2)

181-190: LGTM! Consider enhancing documentation.

The addition of position tracking variables and the z_visual parameter effectively addresses the trajectory visualization bug mentioned in the PR. The comments explain the purpose well.

Consider adding a more specific comment about what "adjustment" might be needed for z_visual and under what circumstances. This would help future maintainers understand when and how to tune this parameter.


Line range hint 308-316: Please clarify or remove the TODO comment.

The position tracking implementation looks good, but there's an unclear TODO comment about spawn point usage. Consider either:

  1. Implementing the spawn point functionality if it's needed
  2. Removing the TODO if it's not necessary
  3. Adding more context about why/when this might be needed

This will help maintain clear documentation and avoid confusion for future developers.

Would you like me to help implement the spawn point functionality or create a GitHub issue to track this task?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ab35f8d and 9d2cafe.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • code/acting/launch/acting_debug.launch (1 hunks)
  • code/acting/src/acting/Acting_Debug_Node.py (2 hunks)
  • doc/acting/acting_testing.md (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
doc/acting/acting_testing.md

[uncategorized] ~22-~22: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...om the acting package. As mentioned above this includes everything we need. - In ...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)

🔇 Additional comments (5)
code/acting/launch/acting_debug.launch (3)

9-12: LGTM! Parameters are correctly forwarded to the base launch file.


32-39: Verify RViz configuration and consider making plot topics configurable.

  1. The RViz configuration is referenced from a different package (agent). Let's verify its existence.
  2. The rqt_plot topics seem specific to velocity testing. Consider making them configurable for different debugging scenarios.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify RViz configuration file exists

# Test: Check if the rviz config exists
fd "rviz_config.rviz" --type f
 <launch>
+    <arg name="debug_plot_topics" default="/carla/hero/Speed /paf/hero/target_velocity /paf/hero/throttle /paf/hero/brake" />
     ...
     <group if="$(arg show_rqt_plots_automatically)">
         <node pkg="rqt_plot" type="rqt_plot" output="screen" name="velocity_test" 
-            args="/carla/hero/Speed /paf/hero/target_velocity /paf/hero/throttle /paf/hero/brake"/>
+            args="$(arg debug_plot_topics)"/>
     </group>

14-18: Verify debug node implementation.

The node configuration looks correct, but let's verify the implementation.

✅ Verification successful

Node implementation verified successfully

The Acting_Debug_Node correctly implements both required parameters:

  • role_name via self.get_param("role_name", "ego_vehicle")
  • control_loop_rate via self.get_param("control_loop_rate", 0.05)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify Acting_Debug_Node.py exists and implements required parameters

# Test 1: Check if the node file exists
fd "Acting_Debug_Node.py" --type f

# Test 2: Verify parameter usage in the node
rg -A 5 "rospy.get_param\(['\"]control_loop_rate['\"]|rospy.get_param\(['\"]role_name['\"]" Acting_Debug_Node.py

Length of output: 328


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the node implementation with the correct path
rg -A 5 "rospy.get_param\(['\"]control_loop_rate['\"]|rospy.get_param\(['\"]role_name['\"]" code/acting/src/acting/Acting_Debug_Node.py

# Also check the general structure of the node
cat code/acting/src/acting/Acting_Debug_Node.py

Length of output: 17616

doc/acting/acting_testing.md (1)

Line range hint 1-43: Documentation successfully meets PR objectives

The documentation effectively covers all aspects mentioned in the PR objectives:

  • Clear instructions for the new acting_debug.launch file
  • Comprehensive debugging setup guidance
  • Configuration options for addressing visualization issues

The structure is well-organized and provides a good balance of high-level overview and detailed instructions.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~22-~22: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...om the acting package. As mentioned above this includes everything we need. - In ...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)

code/acting/src/acting/Acting_Debug_Node.py (1)

300-300: LGTM! Good fix for trajectory visualization.

Replacing the hardcoded z-coordinate with the configurable z_visual parameter is a good improvement. This makes the trajectory height adjustable and fixes the visualization bug mentioned in the PR.

@Johannes1098
Copy link
Collaborator

Checklist isn't fulfilled yet.

@seitzseb seitzseb merged commit 49792b5 into main Nov 11, 2024
4 checks passed
@seitzseb seitzseb deleted the 477-bug-update-documentation-for-acting_testingmd branch November 11, 2024 07:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: Update documentation for acting_testing.md
3 participants