Updated docs of GitHub actions #495
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to the GitHub Actions workflow for building and pushing Docker images, specifically in the files Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
…n-as-our-cicd-pipeline-runs-reliably
…cd-pipeline-runs-reliably' of https://github.com/una-auxme/paf into 465-update-drive-action-documentation-as-soon-as-our-cicd-pipeline-runs-reliably
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
doc/development/build_action.md (4)
31-31: Fix grammar in the transition sentence.Add a comma for better readability.
-After the action is finished the `drive` action is triggered. +After the action is finished, the `drive` action is triggered.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~31-~31: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ... specific version. After the action is finished thedriveaction is triggered. ## Th...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
46-49: Enhance cache configuration documentation.Consider adding more technical details about:
- Cache configuration parameters
- Cache storage location
- Cache invalidation rules
67-78: Specify artifact retention details.The documentation should specify:
- Default retention period
- How to configure retention
- Size limitations for artifacts
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~73-~73: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...ifact If the action was triggered by a merge an artifact is created with an invalid ...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
79-86: Clarify cache cleanup process.Please elaborate on:
- The difference between PR and merge caches
- When and why caches become obsolete
- The impact of cache cleanup on build performance
doc/development/drive_action.md (3)
29-40: Enhance artifact handling documentation.While the new sections are well-structured, consider the following improvements:
- Fix spelling: "preceeding" → "preceding"
- Add more details about:
- Expected artifact format
- Location of extracted files
- Structure of the JSON file
65-65: Fix grammar in simulation results description.-Reads the simulation results an creates a table for better readability. +Reads the simulation results and creates a table for better readability.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~65-~65: Did you mean “and”?
Context: ...lts table Reads the simulation results an creates a table for better readability....(VB_AN_VB_DT)
98-100: Consider adding pruning command details.The pruning section would be more helpful with:
- The actual command used for pruning
- Any configurable parameters (e.g., how to adjust the one-day threshold)
- Impact on cached images
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/workflows/build.yml(1 hunks)doc/development/build_action.md(3 hunks)doc/development/drive_action.md(4 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .github/workflows/build.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
doc/development/build_action.md
[uncategorized] ~31-~31: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ... specific version. After the action is finished the drive action is triggered. ## Th...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~73-~73: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...ifact If the action was triggered by a merge an artifact is created with an invalid ...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
doc/development/drive_action.md
[grammar] ~65-~65: Did you mean “and”?
Context: ...lts table Reads the simulation results an creates a table for better readability....
(VB_AN_VB_DT)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
doc/development/build_action.md (2)
11-20: LGTM! Well-structured table of contents.
The updated table of contents accurately reflects the new workflow steps and maintains proper organization.
Line range hint 1-89: Overall documentation structure is well-organized.
The updated documentation successfully achieves the objectives from PR #495 and issue #465 by:
- Clearly documenting all workflow steps
- Following a consistent format
- Maintaining proper organization
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~73-~73: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...ifact If the action was triggered by a merge an artifact is created with an invalid ...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
doc/development/drive_action.md (3)
7-15: LGTM! Well-structured table of contents.
The updated table of contents provides a clear and logical progression of steps, accurately reflecting the workflow's enhanced artifact handling and results presentation.
Line range hint 71-96: LGTM! Comprehensive results presentation.
The simulation results table provides a clear and detailed breakdown of all relevant metrics, making it easy for users to understand the agent's performance.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~65-~65: Did you mean “and”?
Context: ...lts table Reads the simulation results an creates a table for better readability....
(VB_AN_VB_DT)
[grammar] ~73-~73: Did you mean “steps use” or “step uses”?
Context: ...arketplace/actions/github-script) This steps uses a JS script to parse the simulation res...
(NNS_USES)
[grammar] ~73-~73: The plural noun “results” cannot be used with the article “a”. Did you mean “a result” or “results”?
Context: ...mulation results and add a comment with a results table to the corresponding pull request...
(A_NNS)
Line range hint 1-100: Documentation successfully updated to reflect current behavior.
The changes effectively address the objectives from issue #465 by:
- Updating the drive action documentation to reflect current workflow
- Adding missing steps for artifact handling and results presentation
- Improving overall structure and clarity
The documentation now accurately represents the CI/CD pipeline's current behavior.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~65-~65: Did you mean “and”?
Context: ...lts table Reads the simulation results an creates a table for better readability....
(VB_AN_VB_DT)
[grammar] ~73-~73: Did you mean “steps use” or “step uses”?
Context: ...arketplace/actions/github-script) This steps uses a JS script to parse the simulation res...
(NNS_USES)
[grammar] ~73-~73: The plural noun “results” cannot be used with the article “a”. Did you mean “a result” or “results”?
Context: ...mulation results and add a comment with a results table to the corresponding pull request...
(A_NNS)
ll7
deleted the
465-update-drive-action-documentation-as-soon-as-our-cicd-pipeline-runs-reliably
branch
Description
This PR updates the documentation of the
buildanddriveaction to reflect their current behavior.Fixes #465
Type of change
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No.
Most important changes
Only changes to documentation.
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
build_action.mdto enhance the structure and clarity of the GitHub Actions workflow for building and pushing Docker images, including new steps for caching and managing artifacts.drive_action.mdto improve the sequence of steps and detail the handling of artifacts during the drive job.Chores