Update sprint review presentation guidelines #512
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe changes involve updates to two documents related to the Sprint Review Meeting for PAF24. The Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
doc/development/sprint_review_presentation.md (4)
12-12: Fix grammatical error in the introductory sentenceThe sentence is missing an article and has incorrect verb form.
-These technical presentations meant to present project progress from the sprint. +These are technical presentations meant to present project progress from the sprint.
37-37: Enhance demo guidelines with preparation instructionsThe demo section should include guidelines for:
- Having a backup plan (screenshots/recordings) in case of technical issues
- Testing the demo environment before the presentation
- Time management for live demos
-**Demo**: Provide a quick live demo or walkthrough of the feature or bug fix that the PR addresses. +**Demo**: Provide a quick live demo or walkthrough of the feature or bug fix that the PR addresses. + - Prepare screenshots or recordings as backup in case of technical issues + - Test the demo environment before the presentation + - Keep demos focused and under 2 minutes
12-12: Fix grammatical error in the introductory sentenceThe sentence has a grammatical error that affects readability.
-These technical presentations meant to present project progress from the sprint. +These technical presentations are meant to present project progress from the sprint.
47-48: Consider improving template accessibilityThe template link points to a university media store which might:
- Break if the media store URL structure changes
- Be inaccessible to external contributors
Consider:
- Including templates directly in the repository
- Providing a backup download location
- Adding access instructions for external contributors
doc/dev_talks/paf24/sprint_review_meeting_guidelines.md (2)
Line range hint
82-98: Resolve timing discrepancy in the schedule.The mermaid diagram shows the meeting ending at 17:15, but the agenda items in the document end at 16:50. Consider either:
- Adjusting the mermaid diagram to match the agenda timing
- Updating the agenda items to account for the full time until 17:15
Apply this diff to fix the timing:
title Schedule of the Sprint Review on Monday dateFormat HH-mm axisFormat %H:%M tickInterval 15minute section Before the Meeting Text Submission and Group Info: milestone, at, 11-30, 0H Sample Review: sr, 12-00, 13-00 Sample Review Feedback: fb1, 13-00, 30m section During the Meeting Meeting Start: milestone, beginn, 14-00, 0m Questions: f, 14-00, 5m Group Presentations: p, after f, 100m Break: pu, after p, 10m Grading Discussion and Sprint Planning: nsp, after pu, 35m Feedback: fb2, after nsp, 20m -Sprint Planning Discussion: spd, after fb2, 25m -End of Meeting: milestone, ende, 17-15, 0m +Sprint Planning Discussion: spd, after fb2, 20m +End of Meeting: milestone, ende, 16-50, 0m
Line range hint
19-22: Consider improving document references and links.A few suggestions to enhance the documentation:
- The "Summary of Work Template" link could be made absolute (like the issue link) to ensure it works from any context
- Consider replacing the DigiCampus direct URL with a more maintainable reference (e.g., environment variable or configuration)
Would you like me to propose a specific implementation for managing these external references?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
doc/dev_talks/paf24/sprint_review_meeting_guidelines.md(1 hunks)doc/development/sprint_review_presentation.md(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
doc/development/sprint_review_presentation.md (1)
37-40: Clarify time management for demos and Q&A
The current guidelines specify 5 minutes per person but don't address:
- How to coordinate time in group presentations
- Time allocation for demos within the 5-minute limit
- Whether Q&A time is included in or separate from the 5-minute allocation
Let me check if these details are covered in the meeting guidelines:
doc/dev_talks/paf24/sprint_review_meeting_guidelines.md (1)
Line range hint 31-33: Verify time allocations against class size.
The current time allocations might be tight:
- Sprint Presentations slot (105 minutes) can accommodate ~21 students at 5 minutes each
- Sample Review slot (90 minutes) might be insufficient depending on the number of students selected for review
Please verify:
- The total number of students in the class
- The expected number of students for sample review
- Whether the time slots provide sufficient buffer for transitions and potential delays
Would you like me to help draft a more detailed time allocation plan based on the actual class size?
Also applies to: 38-40
| - The sprint review presentation guideline will be updated. in [#452](https://github.com/una-auxme/paf/issues/452). | ||
| - [sprint_review_presentation.md](../../development/sprint_review_presentation.md) will be updated accordingly. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Fix grammatical error and update incorrect document path
The document path in the markdown file is incorrect. Please apply these changes:
-The sprint review presentation guideline will be updated. in [#452](https://github.com/una-auxme/paf/issues/452).
+The sprint review presentation guideline will be updated in [#452](https://github.com/una-auxme/paf/issues/452).
-[sprint_review_presentation.md](../../development/sprint_review_presentation.md)
+[sprint_review_presentation.md](../../../doc/development/sprint_review_presentation.md)- Fixed the grammatical error by removing the unnecessary period
- Corrected the relative path to the presentation document which is located at
doc/development/sprint_review_presentation.md
🔗 Analysis chain
Fix grammatical error in the update note.
There's a grammatical error in the sentence structure.
Apply this diff to fix the punctuation:
-The sprint review presentation guideline will be updated. in [#452](https://github.com/una-auxme/paf/issues/452).
+The sprint review presentation guideline will be updated in [#452](https://github.com/una-auxme/paf/issues/452).Let's verify the referenced documents exist:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of referenced documents and their paths
# Check if the referenced presentation document exists
fd -t f "sprint_review_presentation.md" development/
# Check if the summary template exists (referenced in the document)
fd -t f "sprint_summary_template.md" doc/dev_talks/paf24/
Length of output: 257
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the correct path for the presentation document
fd -t f "sprint_review_presentation.md"
# Also check if there might be a different base directory
ls -R | grep ":$" | sed -e 's/:$//' -e 's/[^-][^\/]*\// /g' -e 's/^/ /'
Length of output: 1795
The sprint review presentation guidelines have been modified to support the new meeting structure. Changes include a new focus on group presentations, updated presentation styles. These updates aim to improve communication of team achievements and challenges during sprint reviews.
Fixes #452
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation