Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Submission 447, Hart et al. #22

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 19, 2024
Merged

Submission 447, Hart et al. #22

merged 3 commits into from
Aug 19, 2024

Conversation

mtwente
Copy link
Contributor

@mtwente mtwente commented Aug 19, 2024

Pull request

Proposed changes

  • add submission 447
  • fix markdown formatting
  • add author metadata

Co-authored-by: Stephen Hart [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Vincent Alamercy [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Francesco Beretta [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Djamel Ferhod [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Flick [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Tobias Hodel [email protected]
Co-authored-by: David Knecht [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Gaétan Muck [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Alexandre Perraud [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Morgane Pica [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Pierre Vernus [email protected]

Types of changes

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
  • Enhancement (non-breaking change which enhances functionality)
  • Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change).

Checklist

  • I have read the README document.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have mentioned all co-authors in the PR description as Co-authored-by: Name <[email protected]>.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a manuscript project configuration to streamline online publishing processes.
    • Launched Geovistory, a research framework designed to enhance data accessibility and usability in Humanities and Social Sciences.
    • Added a bibliography file to support proper citation and enhance project credibility with a comprehensive set of references.

These updates will significantly improve the user experience for researchers and enhance the presentation and management of research data.

mtwente and others added 2 commits August 19, 2024 17:55
Co-authored-by: Stephen Hart <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Vincent Alamercy <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Francesco Beretta <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Djamel Ferhod <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Flick <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Tobias Hodel <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: David Knecht <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Gaétan Muck <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Alexandre Perraud <alexandre.perraus.cnrs.fr>
Co-authored-by: Morgane Pica <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Pierre Vernus <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 19, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new manuscript project configuration in _quarto.yml, establishing the structure for a research article titled "Geovistory." The manuscript focuses on enhancing accessibility to research data in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Additionally, a bibliography file references.bib has been created, compiling essential academic references to support the research work. Together, these updates streamline content organization and citation management for effective scholarly communication.

Changes

Files Change Summary
submissions/447/_quarto.yml New configuration file specifying manuscript type, main article file, and HTML output format.
submissions/447/index.qmd Introduces a framework for Geovistory, detailing its components and goals for facilitating open science.
submissions/447/references.bib New bibliography file containing a collection of references in BibTeX format for academic citation use.

Poem

In the garden of knowledge, we hop with glee,
Geovistory blooms, a sight to see! 🌼
With data so fair, findable and bright,
Our research takes flight into the night.
Hopping along, we share and we learn,
For in every leap, new ideas we earn! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between aed60d0 and 51e9376.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • submissions/447/images/Geovistory_components.png is excluded by !**/*.png
Files selected for processing (3)
  • submissions/447/_quarto.yml (1 hunks)
  • submissions/447/index.qmd (1 hunks)
  • submissions/447/references.bib (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • submissions/447/_quarto.yml
  • submissions/447/references.bib
Additional comments not posted (3)
submissions/447/index.qmd (3)

1-66: Metadata is well-structured and complete.

The metadata section includes all necessary information such as submission ID, title, authors with affiliations, ORCID IDs, and keywords. Ensure that the email addresses and ORCID IDs are correct.


63-63: Abstract is clear and informative.

The abstract effectively summarizes the article's focus on Geovistory and its role in the Humanities. It highlights key aspects such as FAIR data, collaborative Knowledge Graphs, and challenges in the Digital Humanities.


68-126: Content is comprehensive and well-organized.

The sections provide a detailed explanation of Geovistory's purpose, features, and integration within the Digital Humanities ecosystem. The use of references and links is appropriate and enhances the content's credibility. Ensure all references are correctly formatted and accessible.

@maehr maehr merged commit e5fbfb6 into digihistch24:main Aug 19, 2024
3 checks passed
This was referenced Sep 9, 2024
@mtwente mtwente deleted the 447 branch September 15, 2024 21:31
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Sep 17, 2024
8 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants