Submission 469, Iván Lorenci de Francisco #34
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: ivanldf13 <[email protected]>
WalkthroughThe recent changes introduce a new manuscript project defined by a Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
submissions/469/index.qmd (2)
33-38: Ensure clarity and conciseness in the abstract.The abstract is detailed and well-structured. However, consider simplifying complex sentences to enhance readability for a broader audience.
- Drawing inspiration from Moretti & Pestre’s influential working paper – Banskpeak – our methodology consists of a two-fold approach. + Inspired by Moretti & Pestre's influential working paper, "Bankspeak," our methodology uses a two-fold approach.
60-98: Clarify methodological choices and their implications.The methodology section is comprehensive, but consider adding more detail on why specific techniques were chosen over others.
- However, in terms of visualisation, precision and displaying temporal dynamics, the capabilities of these two techniques are worse than those of Hierarchical Clustering on Principal Components (HCPC) and Structural Topic Modelling (STM). + However, for visualisation, precision, and displaying temporal dynamics, HCPC and STM offer superior capabilities compared to basic text analysis techniques.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (4)
submissions/469/images/Figure 1.Top_25_Contributors.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsubmissions/469/images/Topics_DHCH.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsubmissions/469/images/noun_topics_gamma.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngsubmissions/469/images/plot.expected.topic.proportions.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
Files selected for processing (3)
- submissions/469/_quarto.yml (1 hunks)
- submissions/469/index.qmd (1 hunks)
- submissions/469/references.bib (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- submissions/469/_quarto.yml
- submissions/469/references.bib
Additional comments not posted (5)
submissions/469/index.qmd (5)
8-8: Consider privacy implications of including email addresses.Including personal email addresses in publicly accessible documents can have privacy implications. Consider whether this is necessary or if an alternative contact method could be used.
51-57: Ensure consistency in historical references.The section mentions specific years and events. Ensure these are consistent with historical records and the rest of the document.
100-106: Ensure alignment between results and conclusions.Verify that the conclusions drawn are directly supported by the results presented in the study.
1-11: Verify bibliographic file existence.Ensure that the
Master_thesis_ILDF.bibfile exists and is correctly referenced in the project.Verification successful
Bibliographic file verified.
The bibliographic file
Master_thesis_ILDF.bibis present in the repository and correctly referenced in the metadata. No issues found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the bibliographic file. # Test: Check if the bibliographic file exists in the repository. fd 'Master_thesis_ILDF.bib'Length of output: 66
41-47: Clarify references and citations.Ensure all references and citations are correctly formatted and that the sources are available in the bibliography file.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- submissions/469/index.qmd (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- submissions/469/index.qmd
Pull request
Proposed changes
Co-Authored-By: ivanldf13 [email protected]
Types of changes
Checklist
Co-authored-by: Name <[email protected]>.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes