Refactor Scalers with new declarative scaler config

[dttung2905]

Proposal

We can take turn implement the changes in this PR #5676. This is related to the original issue here #5037. I can take the kafka one since I have been working on something similar in #5319

• activemq_scaler.go Refactor ActiveMQ scaler config #5799
• apache_kafka_scaler.go Refactor Apache Kafka scaler config #5804
• arangodb_scaler.go Refactor arangodb scaler config #5808
• artemis_scaler.go Refactor Artemis scaler config #5836
• aws_cloudwatch_scaler.go Refactor aws cloudwatch scaler #5852
• aws_dynamodb_scaler.go Refactor aws dynamodb scaler #5961
• aws_dynamodb_streams_scaler.go
• aws_kinesis_stream_scaler.go
• aws_sqs_queue_scaler.go
• azure_app_insights_scaler.go
• azure_blob_scaler.go
• azure_data_explorer_scaler.go
• azure_eventhub_scaler.go
• azure_log_analytics_scaler.go
• azure_monitor_scaler.go
• azure_pipelines_scaler.go
• azure_queue_scaler.go
• azure_servicebus_scaler.go
• cassandra_scaler.go
• couchdb_scaler.go
• cpu_memory_scaler.go
• cron_scaler.go
• datadog_scaler.go
• elasticsearch_scaler.go
• etcd_scaler.go
• external_mock_scaler.go
• external_scaler.go
• gcp_cloud_tasks_scaler.go
• gcp_pubsub_scaler.go
• gcp_stackdriver_scaler.go
• gcp_storage_scaler.go
• github_runner_scaler.go
• graphite_scaler.go
• huawei_cloudeye_scaler.go
• ibmmq_scaler.go Refactor IBM MQ scaler and remove and deprecate variables #6034
• influxdb_scaler.go
• kafka_scaler.go
• kubernetes_workload_scaler.go
• liiklus_scaler.go
• loki_scaler.go
• metrics_api_scaler.go
• mongo_scaler.go
• mssql_scaler.go
• mysql_scaler.go
• nats_jetstream_scaler.go
• newrelic_scaler.go
• openstack_metrics_scaler.go
• openstack_swift_scaler.go
• postgresql_scaler.go
• predictkube_scaler.go Refactor predictkube scaler config #6282
• prometheus_scaler.go
• pulsar_scaler.go
• rabbitmq_scaler.go
• redis_scaler.go
• redis_streams_scaler.go
• selenium_grid_scaler.go
• solace_scaler.go
• solr_scaler.go Refactor solr scaler config  #5818
• stan_scaler.go

Use-Case

No response

Is this a feature you are interested in implementing yourself?

Yes

Anything else?

No response

[SpiritZhou]

I can help to do some of them.

[dttung2905]

Sure. Me and @wozniakjan is doing from top down. May be you want to try doing from bottom up?

[wozniakjan]

fyi @SpiritZhou, @dttung2905 no need to introduce changelog entry for each PR, it will be mentioned in one place - #5799 (comment)

[stale]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

[wozniakjan]

@Stale unstale please? :)