Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

383 planning evaluate and document motion planning #418

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Nov 2, 2024

Conversation

niklasr22
Copy link
Contributor

@niklasr22 niklasr22 commented Nov 1, 2024

Description

This updates the markdown documentation of the motion planning component as well as the actual code (doc strings). (Solves issue #383)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (might be obsolete with CI later on)
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes (might be obsolete with CI later on)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced trajectory generation for overtaking maneuvers.
    • Improved motion planning functionality with updated velocity recommendations.
  • Documentation

    • Updated architecture document detailing vehicle agent components and their interactions.
    • Revised motion planning documentation for clarity on functionality and data interfaces.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Adjusted method logic for improved trajectory handling and behavior management.

@niklasr22 niklasr22 added this to the Sprint 00 2024-11-04 milestone Nov 1, 2024
@niklasr22 niklasr22 linked an issue Nov 1, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
1 task
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 1, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes include significant modifications to the MotionPlanning class in motion_planning.py, enhancing its functionality and clarity in trajectory generation for overtaking maneuvers. The architecture documentation has been restructured to provide detailed descriptions of the vehicle agent's components, including Perception, Planning, and Acting. Additionally, the motion_planning.md document has been updated to clarify the motion planning module's responsibilities and interactions with other components, streamlining the information for better readability.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
code/planning/src/local_planner/motion_planning.py - Reorganized imports, added math and numpy.
- Updated class docstring for clarity.
- Modified __init__ to include new attributes.
- Renamed change_trajectory to generate_overtake_trajectory with expanded implementation.
- Updated methods with type hints and renamed create_sublists to group_points_by_proximity.
- Adjusted logic in several methods, replacing old method calls with new ones.
- Updated docstrings for better descriptions.
doc/general/architecture.md - Expanded sections on Perception, Planning, and Acting components with detailed node responsibilities.
- Improved overall formatting and readability.
- Added links to external resources.
doc/planning/motion_planning.md - Updated summary to clarify motion planning responsibilities.
- Streamlined document structure, removing the "Component" section.
- Enhanced descriptions in "Overview" and "ROS Data Interface" sections.
- Added debugging topics section.

Suggested labels

documentation

Suggested reviewers

  • JulianTrommer

Poem

🐰 In the meadow where the code does play,
New paths for overtaking lead the way.
With clearer docs and methods refined,
A hopping good time for the code we find!
Let's celebrate with a joyful cheer,
For every change brings us closer, my dear! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 8

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
doc/planning/motion_planning.md (4)

3-4: Fix typo and improve file path reference.

There are a few minor issues in the summary:

  • "fowarded" should be "forwarded"
  • The file path uses ellipsis which makes it harder to navigate. Consider using the full relative path.
-**Summary:** [motion_planning.py](.../code/planning/local_planner/src/motion_planning.py):
+**Summary:** [motion_planning.py](../../../code/planning/local_planner/src/motion_planning.py):
-The motion planning is responsible for collecting all the velocity recommendations from the different components and choosing the optimal one to be fowarded into the acting.
+The motion planning is responsible for collecting all the velocity recommendations from the different components and choosing the optimal one to be forwarded into the acting.

16-16: Fix grammar and hyphenation.

A few grammatical improvements are needed:

  • "wether" should be "whether"
  • "decision making" should be hyphenated as "decision-making"
-It also publishes a topic that indicates wether an overtake maneuver was successful or not.
+It also publishes a topic that indicates whether an overtake maneuver was successful or not.
-When the decision making node decides that an overtake maneuver is necessary,
+When the decision-making node decides that an overtake maneuver is necessary,

Also applies to: 21-21

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~16-~16: The preposition “whether” seems more likely in this position.
Context: ...t also publishes a topic that indicates wether an overtake maneuver was successful or ...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_PREPOSITION)


30-42: Add message types for subscribed topics.

For consistency and completeness, please add message type information with documentation links for all subscribed topics, similar to how it's done in the published topics section. This helps developers understand the interface better.

Example format:

-`/carla/hero/Speed`: Subscribes to the current speed.
+`/carla/hero/Speed`: Subscribes to the current speed. ([std_msgs/Float32](http://docs.ros.org/en/api/std_msgs/html/msg/Float32.html))

Would you like me to help generate the complete list with proper message types?

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~30-~30: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...following topics: - /carla/hero/Speed: Subscribes to the current speed. - `/pa...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~31-~31: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...urrent speed. - /paf/hero/acc_velocity: Subscribes to the speed published by th...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~33-~33: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...bound in pixels. - /paf/hero/collision: Subscribes to the collision published b...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~34-~34: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...ision Check. - /paf/hero/curr_behavior: Subscribes to Current Behavior pubished...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~34-~34: The noun “Decision-Making” (= the process of deciding something) is spelled with a hyphen.
Context: ...bes to Current Behavior pubished by the Decision Making. - /paf/hero/current_heading: Subscri...

(DECISION_MAKING)


[uncategorized] ~35-~35: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...on Making. - /paf/hero/current_heading: Subscribes to the filtered heading of t...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~36-~36: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...e ego vehicle. - /paf/hero/current_pos: Subscribes to the filtered position of ...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~37-~37: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...ion of our car. - /paf/hero/current_wp: Subscribes to the current waypoint. - `...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~38-~38: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...oint. - /paf/hero/lane_change_distance: Subscribes to the Carla Waypoint to che...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~39-~39: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...a lane change. - /paf/hero/speed_limit: Subscribes to the speed limit. - `/paf/...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~40-~40: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...d limit. - /paf/hero/trajectory_global: Subscribes to the global trajectory, wh...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~41-~41: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...mulation. - /paf/hero/unstuck_distance: Subscribes to the distance travelled by...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~42-~42: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...aneuver. - /paf/hero/waypoint_distance: Subscribes to the Carla Waypoint to get...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


63-65: Improve debugging section structure and fix punctuation.

The debugging section could be improved:

  • Remove the unnecessary comma before "if"
  • Consider adding more details about the debugging functionality
-Can spawn a car on the first straight in the dev environment, if this message is manually published.
+Can spawn a car on the first straight in the dev environment if this message is manually published.

Consider adding:

  • The message type for the debugging topic
  • Example usage or command to publish the message
  • Expected behavior when the message is received
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~65-~65: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...bugging topics: - /paf/hero/Spawn_car: Can spawn a car on the first straight i...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[typographical] ~65-~65: Usually, there’s no comma before “if”.
Context: ...he first straight in the dev environment, if this message is manually published.

(IF_NO_COMMA)

doc/general/architecture.md (1)

Line range hint 1-24: Documentation enhancement suggestions

The architecture documentation is well-structured, but could benefit from the following improvements:

  1. Message Type Documentation:

    • Consider adding links to ROS message documentation consistently across all message types
    • Example: Add links for custom messages like perception/Waypoint and perception/LanecChange
  2. Component Interactions:

    • Consider adding sequence diagrams or flow charts to illustrate the interaction between components
    • This would be particularly helpful for understanding the relationship between Motion Planning and other Planning components
  3. Visualization Section:

    • Consider expanding the Visualization section with specific examples of what is being visualized
    • Add details about visualization tools and interfaces used

Would you like assistance in implementing any of these suggestions?

Also applies to: 201-201

code/planning/src/local_planner/motion_planning.py (4)

163-165: Move wp_subs subscription to the subscribers section.

The wp_subs subscription is currently placed separately from the other subscribers. According to the TODO comment and for better code organization and readability, consider moving it up to the subscribers section where other subscription initializations are defined.


Line range hint 398-404: Simplify euclid_dist function using NumPy's linalg.norm.

As per the TODO comment, replace the custom Euclidean distance calculation with NumPy's built-in function for better efficiency and readability.

Apply this diff:

 def euclid_dist(vector1, vector2):
-    # TODO replace with numpy function
-    point1 = np.array(vector1)
-    point2 = np.array(vector2)
-
-    diff = point2 - point1
-    sum_sqrt = np.dot(diff.T, diff)
-    return np.sqrt(sum_sqrt)
+    return np.linalg.norm(np.array(vector1) - np.array(vector2))

440-447: Add type hints to convert_pose_to_array parameters for clarity.

Currently, the method's parameter poses lacks a specific type hint for the elements it contains. Clarify the type of elements within poses to enhance code maintainability and help static type checkers.

Update the method signature:

-    def convert_pose_to_array(poses: np.ndarray) -> np.ndarray:
+    def convert_pose_to_array(self, poses: np.ndarray[np.ndarray]) -> np.ndarray:

685-687: Improve the docstring of the run method for clarity.

The current docstring can be updated to follow PEP 257 conventions by providing a one-line summary and a more detailed description if necessary. This enhances readability and helps maintain consistent documentation.

Here's a suggested docstring:

 def run(self):
-    """
-    Control loop that updates the target speed and publishes the target trajectory and speed over ROS topics.
-    """
+    """Start the control loop to update and publish target speed and trajectory.

+    This method initializes a timer that periodically updates the target speed based on current behavior and ACC speed,
+    and publishes the target trajectory and speed over ROS topics.
+    """
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 495e1d5 and 2659581.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • code/planning/src/local_planner/motion_planning.py (15 hunks)
  • doc/general/architecture.md (1 hunks)
  • doc/planning/motion_planning.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff
code/planning/src/local_planner/motion_planning.py

414-414: Found useless expression. Either assign it to a variable or remove it.

(B018)

🪛 LanguageTool
doc/planning/motion_planning.md

[uncategorized] ~16-~16: The preposition “whether” seems more likely in this position.
Context: ...t also publishes a topic that indicates wether an overtake maneuver was successful or ...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_PREPOSITION)


[uncategorized] ~21-~21: The noun “decision-making” (= the process of deciding something) is spelled with a hyphen.
Context: ...d by the motion planning node. When the decision making node decides that an overtake maneuver ...

(DECISION_MAKING)


[uncategorized] ~21-~21: A comma may be missing after the conjunctive/linking adverb ‘Otherwise’.
Context: ...will adjust the trajectory accordingly. Otherwise the received trajectory is published wi...

(SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA)


[uncategorized] ~30-~30: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...following topics: - /carla/hero/Speed: Subscribes to the current speed. - `/pa...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~31-~31: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...urrent speed. - /paf/hero/acc_velocity: Subscribes to the speed published by th...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~33-~33: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...bound in pixels. - /paf/hero/collision: Subscribes to the collision published b...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~34-~34: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...ision Check. - /paf/hero/curr_behavior: Subscribes to Current Behavior pubished...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~34-~34: The noun “Decision-Making” (= the process of deciding something) is spelled with a hyphen.
Context: ...bes to Current Behavior pubished by the Decision Making. - /paf/hero/current_heading: Subscri...

(DECISION_MAKING)


[uncategorized] ~35-~35: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...on Making. - /paf/hero/current_heading: Subscribes to the filtered heading of t...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~36-~36: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...e ego vehicle. - /paf/hero/current_pos: Subscribes to the filtered position of ...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~37-~37: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...ion of our car. - /paf/hero/current_wp: Subscribes to the current waypoint. - `...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~38-~38: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...oint. - /paf/hero/lane_change_distance: Subscribes to the Carla Waypoint to che...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~39-~39: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...a lane change. - /paf/hero/speed_limit: Subscribes to the speed limit. - `/paf/...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~40-~40: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...d limit. - /paf/hero/trajectory_global: Subscribes to the global trajectory, wh...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~41-~41: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...mulation. - /paf/hero/unstuck_distance: Subscribes to the distance travelled by...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~42-~42: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...aneuver. - /paf/hero/waypoint_distance: Subscribes to the Carla Waypoint to get...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~48-~48: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ... topics: - /paf/hero/overtake_success: Publishes if an overtake was successful...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[uncategorized] ~65-~65: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...bugging topics: - /paf/hero/Spawn_car: Can spawn a car on the first straight i...

(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)


[typographical] ~65-~65: Usually, there’s no comma before “if”.
Context: ...he first straight in the dev environment, if this message is manually published.

(IF_NO_COMMA)

🔇 Additional comments (4)
doc/general/architecture.md (1)

201-201: LGTM: New subscription properly documented

The addition of the current_wp subscription is well-documented and consistent with the Motion Planning module's responsibilities.

code/planning/src/local_planner/motion_planning.py (3)

388-388: Verify if filtering sublists with only one point is intended.

The TODO comment suggests checking whether it's intended to filter out sublists with only one point. Ensure that this behavior is correct and doesn't exclude necessary data for subsequent processing.


562-564: Confirm correct handling of unstuck flag in trajectory generation.

In the __get_speed_unstuck method, when generating the overtake trajectory with unstuck=True, ensure that the generate_overtake_trajectory method properly adjusts the trajectory for the unstuck scenario.


489-492: Ensure overtake trajectory is correctly initiated in __set_curr_behavior.

When the current behavior is ot_enter_init, the method change_trajectory is called. Verify that self.__collision_point is properly set and that change_trajectory effectively generates the required overtake trajectory.

Run the following script to check the assignments of self.__collision_point:

✅ Verification successful

Overtake trajectory initialization is properly handled in __set_curr_behavior

The verification shows that the overtake trajectory system is correctly implemented:

  1. self.__collision_point is properly managed:

    • Initialized as None
    • Updated via __set_collision_point callback when collision data is received
    • Checked for validity (np.isinf) before trajectory generation
  2. The overtake trajectory flow is correct:

    • When ot_enter_init behavior is set, it checks collision point validity
    • If valid, calls change_trajectory with the collision point
    • change_trajectory then calls generate_overtake_trajectory and updates status
    • Status is properly published via overtake_success_pub
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all assignments to `self.__collision_point`

# Test: Search for assignments. Expect to find where `self.__collision_point` is set.
rg --python --multiline-dotall 'self\.__collision_point\s*=.*'

Length of output: 475


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for assignments to collision_point
rg "self\.__collision_point\s*=" 

# Search for the implementation of __set_curr_behavior method
ast-grep --pattern 'def __set_curr_behavior(self, $_):
    $$$'

# Search for change_trajectory method implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'def change_trajectory(self, $_):
    $$$'

# Search for overtake behavior related code
rg -A 5 "ot_enter_init"

Length of output: 5023


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for generate_overtake_trajectory implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'def generate_overtake_trajectory(self, $_):
    $$$'

# Search for collision point initialization and updates
rg -B 3 -A 3 "collision_point"

# Search for where collision point data is received
rg -B 3 -A 3 "data\.data\[0\]"

Length of output: 6161


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for generate_overtake_trajectory implementation which was missed in the previous run
rg -A 10 "def generate_overtake_trajectory"

# Search for overtake_success_pub initialization and usage
rg -B 3 -A 3 "overtake_success_pub"

Length of output: 3214

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
code/planning/src/local_planner/motion_planning.py (2)

164-168: Add type hints to class attributes.

The TODO comment indicates missing type hints. Consider adding type hints to improve code maintainability and IDE support.

-        # TODO: add type hints
-        self.target_speed = 0.0
-        self.__curr_behavior = None
-        self.__acc_speed = 0.0
+        self.target_speed: float = 0.0
+        self.__curr_behavior: Optional[str] = None
+        self.__acc_speed: float = 0.0

Line range hint 347-358: Optimize corner point calculations using numpy vectorized operations.

The TODO comment suggests using numpy functions. The current implementation using list comprehensions can be optimized.

-        # TODO: refactor by using numpy functions
-        x_values = np.array([point[0] for point in coords])
-        y_values = np.array([point[1] for point in coords])
-
-        angles = np.arctan2(np.diff(y_values), np.diff(x_values))
+        differences = np.diff(coords, axis=0)
+        angles = np.arctan2(differences[:, 1], differences[:, 0])
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2659581 and df2d0a0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • code/planning/src/local_planner/motion_planning.py (15 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff
code/planning/src/local_planner/motion_planning.py

421-421: Found useless expression. Either assign it to a variable or remove it.

(B018)

🔇 Additional comments (3)
code/planning/src/local_planner/motion_planning.py (3)

Line range hint 3-33: LGTM! Import organization and docstring improvements.

The reorganized imports and enhanced class docstring provide better clarity about the module's purpose and dependencies.


239-241: Verify trajectory generation before updating overtake status.

The overtake status is set to 1 immediately after calling generate_overtake_trajectory, without verifying if the trajectory generation was successful.

#!/bin/bash
# Search for error handling patterns in trajectory generation
rg -A 5 "generate_overtake_trajectory.*\{" | rg "if.*error|try.*except|raise"

332-344: LGTM! Improved documentation and type hints.

The method's documentation and type hints have been significantly improved, making the code more maintainable.

Copy link
Contributor

@victor-42 victor-42 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like the new function names! They are quite more accurate now.
Also appreciate the additional typings and comments :)

@niklasr22 niklasr22 merged commit cd6c47a into main Nov 2, 2024
4 checks passed
@niklasr22 niklasr22 deleted the 383-planning-evaluate-and-document-motion-planning branch November 2, 2024 16:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Planning: Evaluate and document motion planning
2 participants