Submission 443, Ehrmann et al.

[mtwente]

Pull request

Proposed changes

• add submission 443
• fix markdown formatting

Co-authored-by: Maud Ehrmann [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Raphaëlle Ruppen Coutaz [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Simon Clematide [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Marten Düring [email protected]

Types of changes

• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
• Enhancement (non-breaking change which enhances functionality)
• Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change).

Checklist

• I have read the README document.
• My change requires a change to the documentation.
• I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• I have mentioned all co-authors in the PR description as Co-authored-by: Name <[email protected]>.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Introduced a configuration file for manuscript projects to manage rendering and formatting.
  • Added a detailed project document outlining the objectives and challenges of the Impresso 2 initiative, enhancing historical media exploration.
  • Created a comprehensive bibliography file in BibTeX format for academic references related to the Impresso project.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a manuscript project configuration file _quarto.yml, a new article file index.qmd detailing the Impresso 2 project, and a bibliography file references.bib. These files collectively outline the project's scope, objectives, and relevant academic references, facilitating structured documentation and citation for research on historical media content.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
submissions/443/_quarto.yml	New configuration file specifying project type as "manuscript", primary article index.qmd, and output format as HTML.
submissions/443/index.qmd	New article file created detailing the Impresso 2 project, including submission ID, title, authors, keywords, abstract, and date.
submissions/443/references.bib	New bibliography file in BibTeX format containing multiple academic references related to the Impresso project.

Poem

In fields of data, I hop and play,
With manuscripts blooming, bright as the day.
References gathered, a scholarly feast,
Impresso 2 shines, to say the least!
So let’s celebrate, with a joyful cheer,
For history’s treasures are now drawing near! 🐇✨

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (3)

submissions/443/references.bib (3)

121-127: Entry ehrmann_explorer_2021 is correctly formatted but could include a URL or DOI.

This article entry is well-structured and includes all necessary fields. However, including a URL or DOI would enhance accessibility and reliability for academic referencing.

Consider adding a URL or DOI to improve accessibility.

---

130-135: Entry badenoch_airy_2013 is correctly formatted but could include an ISBN or DOI.

This book entry is well-structured and includes all necessary fields. However, including an ISBN or DOI would enhance accessibility and reliability for academic referencing.

Consider adding an ISBN or DOI to improve accessibility.

---

151-158: Entry alma991017981185503976 is correctly formatted but could include an ISBN or DOI.

This incollection entry is well-structured and includes all necessary fields. However, including an ISBN or DOI would enhance accessibility and reliability for academic referencing.

Consider adding an ISBN or DOI to improve accessibility.

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2c8cb60 and eee9c68.

Files ignored due to path filters (2)

• submissions/443/images/Figure1.png is excluded by !**/*.png
• submissions/443/images/Figure2.png is excluded by !**/*.png

Files selected for processing (3)

• submissions/443/_quarto.yml (1 hunks)
• submissions/443/index.qmd (1 hunks)
• submissions/443/references.bib (1 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• submissions/443/_quarto.yml

Additional comments not posted (11)

submissions/443/references.bib (10)

6-18: Entry romanello_impresso_2020 is correctly formatted.

This bibliographic entry is well-structured and includes all necessary fields, ensuring accurate citation and referencing.

---

20-36: Entry ehrmann_language_2020 is correctly formatted.

This inproceedings entry is well-structured and includes comprehensive details, ensuring it can be accurately cited in academic contexts.

---

38-52: Entry cronqvist_entangled_2017 is correctly formatted.

This article entry is well-structured and includes all necessary fields, including DOI and ISSN, which are crucial for academic referencing.

---

54-65: Entry fickers_hybrid_2018 is correctly formatted.

This article entry is well-structured and includes all necessary fields, ensuring it can be accurately cited in academic contexts.

---

67-79: Entry fickers_transnational_2012 is correctly formatted.

This book entry is well-structured and includes all necessary fields, including DOI and ISBN, which are crucial for academic referencing.

---

81-92: Entry beelen_bias_2022 is correctly formatted.

This article entry is well-structured and includes all necessary fields, including DOI and ISSN, which are crucial for academic referencing.

---

94-107: Entry during_impresso_2021 is correctly formatted.

This article entry is well-structured and includes all necessary fields, ensuring it can be accurately cited in academic contexts.

---

109-119: Entry during_impresso_2023 is correctly formatted.

This article entry is well-structured and includes all necessary fields, ensuring it can be accurately cited in academic contexts.

---

138-149: Entry during_transparent_2024 is correctly formatted.

This article entry is well-structured and includes all necessary fields, ensuring it can be accurately cited in academic contexts.

---

160-167: Entry beelen_surveying_2024 is correctly formatted.

This miscellaneous entry is well-structured and includes all necessary fields, ensuring it can be accurately cited in academic contexts.

submissions/443/index.qmd (1)

40-127: Review of Content Sections

The content of the document is rich and detailed, providing a comprehensive overview of the Impresso project's scope, objectives, and methodologies. The sections are well-organized, starting from an introduction to more detailed discussions on specific challenges and strategies of the project.

• Introduction (lines 40-44): Clearly introduces the project and its evolution. No issues noted.
• Media Monitoring (lines 46-52): Effectively outlines the project's aims and historical context. The use of citations is appropriate, though it should be verified that all referenced works are included in the references.bib file to ensure proper citation.
• Challenges in Enriching and Integrating (lines 61-91): Discusses the technical and methodological challenges in detail. The structured approach to explaining the project's phases and goals is commendable.
• Data Acquisition and Sharing Framework (lines 98-100): Addresses legal and operational strategies for data handling, which is crucial given the transnational nature of the project. It's important to ensure that all legal frameworks mentioned are accurately represented and up-to-date.
• Interfaces (lines 125-127): Describes the development of user interfaces for the project. This section could benefit from more technical details regarding the implementation and features of these interfaces.

Overall, the document is well-written and informative. Ensure all bibliographic references are correctly formatted and included in the references.bib file.