-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 52
prelecture_15_amperes_law
- Last time, Biot-Savart Law which allows us to calculate the magnetic field produced by an arbitrary current distribution.
- Now, Ampere's Law which defines the integral within
a closed path to a current passing through the area
of that path
- [\oint\limits_{loop} \vec B \cdot d \vec l = \mu_0 I_{enclosed}]
- Recall we represented an electric field by a point charge
by a set of radial field lines emanating from the charge
with the number of these lines being proportional to the
magnitude of this field
- Electric Flux through any surface
- [\Sigma_E \equiv \int\limits_{surface} \vec E \cdot d \vec A]
- Gauss' Law
- [\oint\limits_{surface} \vec E \cdot d \vec A = \frac{ q_enclosed}{ \varepsilon_0}]
- Ampere's Law
- [\oint\limits_{loop} \vec B \cdot d \vec l = \mu_0 I]
- Holds true of any path which current flows through
A current [I] flow in a long straight wire as shown. In Case 1 we consider [\oint\limits_{loop} \vec B \cdot d \vec l] along a circular path of radius [R] centered on the wire, and in Case 2 we consider [\oint\limits_{loop} \vec B \cdot d \vec l] along a circular path of radius [2R] centered on the wire:
How do the magnitudes of [\oint\limits_{loop} \vec B \cdot d \vec l] around the closed paths compare?
- They are the same
- As shown in the following diagram, the strength of the
magnetic field [B] is reduced by a factor of two since
it scales like [\frac{ 1}{ R}], and the length of the
path [L] increases by a factor of two since the circumference
of a circle scales like [R] i.e., [C = 2 \pi R]. These two
factors cancel, and the net effect is that the
[\oint\limits_{loop} \vec B \cdot d \vec l] around the closed
path does not depend on the radius of the circle at all:
- As shown in the following diagram, the strength of the
magnetic field [B] is reduced by a factor of two since
it scales like [\frac{ 1}{ R}], and the length of the
path [L] increases by a factor of two since the circumference
of a circle scales like [R] i.e., [C = 2 \pi R]. These two
factors cancel, and the net effect is that the
[\oint\limits_{loop} \vec B \cdot d \vec l] around the closed
path does not depend on the radius of the circle at all:
- Consider magnetic field produced by an infinite strait wire carrying
current [I],
- [\oint\limits_{loop} \vec B \cdot d \vec l]
- we will consider a path connecting two semicircles.
- Consider the integral between four points [a, b, c, d]
- [\oint\limits_{loop} \vec B \cdot d \vec l
= \oint\limits_{a}^{b} \vec B \cdot d \vec l
- \oint\limits_{b}^{c} \vec B \cdot d \vec l
- \oint\limits_{c}^{d} \vec B \cdot d \vec l
- \oint\limits_{d}^{a} \vec B \cdot d \vec l] [= \oint\limits_{b}^{c} \vec B \cdot d \vec l
- \oint\limits_{d}^{a} \vec B \cdot d \vec l]
- [\oint\limits_{b}^{c} \vec B \cdot d \vec l = B( \pi R_{ba}) = \frac{ \mu_0 I}{ 2 \pi R_{bc}} (\pi R_{bc}) = \frac{ \mu_0 I}{ 2}] * [B_{ba} = \frac{ \mu_0 I}{ 2 \pi R_ba}]
- [\oint\limits_{d}^{a} \vec B \cdot d \vec l = \frac{ \mu_0 I}{ 2}]
- [\oint\limits_{loop} \vec B \cdot d \vec l = \mu_0 I] * Note that this is identical to a perfectly circular path.
- [\oint\limits_{loop} \vec B \cdot d \vec l
= \oint\limits_{a}^{b} \vec B \cdot d \vec l
- Consider magnetic field produced by an infinite strait wire carrying
current [I],
- flip the path so it no longer contains the current carrying wire
- [\oint\limits_{loop} \vec B \cdot d \vec l = 0 ]
- flip the path so it no longer contains the current carrying wire
- The result of Ampere's Law is general
- [\oint\limits_{loop} \vec B \cdot d \vec l = \mu_0 I_{enclosed} ]
A long straight wire (the red dot in the diagram below) carries current [I] directly out of the plane of the page. Consider the two closed integration paths shown in Case 1 and Case 2:
How do the magnitudes of the [\oint\limits_{loop} \vec B \cdot d \vec l] around the closed paths compare?
- It is the same in both cases
- This is easily seen by shading in the areas enclosed by the closed paths in both cases:
- Since neither path encloses any current, neither can have a non-zero [\oint\limits_{loop} \vec B \cdot d \vec l].
- This is easily seen by shading in the areas enclosed by the closed paths in both cases:
[\oint\limits_{loop} \vec B \cdot d \vec l = B\oint\limits_{loop} d l = B (2 \pi r)]
[= \mu_0 I_{enclosed} = \mu_0 I \frac{ \pi r^2}{ \pi a^2}]
Hence
[B = \frac{ \mu_0 I}{ 2 \pi a^2} r] for [ r < a]
[B = \frac{ \mu_0 I}{ 2 \pi r}] for [ r > a]
- [B = \frac{ 1}{ 2} \mu_0 n I]
- [n \equiv \frac{ number_of_wires}{ unit_length}